Literature DB >> 30373807

Ceftobiprole Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Pathogens Collected from the United States in 2006 and 2016.

Michael A Pfaller1,2, Robert K Flamm1, Rodrigo E Mendes1, Jennifer M Streit1, Jennifer I Smart3, Kamal A Hamed3, Leonard R Duncan4, Helio S Sader1.   

Abstract

Ceftobiprole is an advanced cephalosporin with potent activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria that has been approved in many European and non-European countries to treat community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia). This study reports on the activity of ceftobiprole against a large set of clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in the United States in 2016 that caused serious infections, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and skin and skin structure infections. To assess any potential temporal changes in ceftobiprole activity, the 2016 results were compared to corresponding MIC data from a 2006 U.S. survey that included key target pathogens. Ceftobiprole exhibited potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, which were 99.3% susceptible), coagulase-negative staphylococci (100% susceptible), Enterococcus faecalis (100% susceptible), Streptococcus pneumoniae (99.7% susceptible), and other tested streptococci. Similarly, ceftobiprole was highly active against Enterobacteriaceae isolates that did not exhibit an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype, including Escherichia coli (99.8% susceptible) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (99.6% susceptible). A total of 99.6% of all Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates were inhibited at ≤1 mg/liter ceftobiprole, and 72.7% of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. With the exception of decreased cephalosporin susceptibility among Enterobacteriaceae isolates, which correlates with an increased prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates, ceftobiprole had similar activities against the isolate sets collected in 2006 and 2016. Therefore, ceftobiprole remains highly active when tested in vitro against a large number of current Gram-positive or Gram-negative pathogens that cause serious infections.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; United States; ceftobiprole; cephalosporin; longitudinal; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30373807      PMCID: PMC6325186          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01566-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

Review 1.  Ceftobiprole medocaril: a review of its use in patients with hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against frequently encountered aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens: results of the CANWARD 2007-2009 study.

Authors:  Andrew Walkty; Heather J Adam; Michel Laverdière; James A Karlowsky; Daryl J Hoban; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  A randomised, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with ceftriaxone with or without linezolid for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation.

Authors:  Susan C Nicholson; Tobias Welte; Thomas M File; Richard S Strauss; Bart Michiels; Pratibha Kaul; Dainius Balis; Deborah Arbit; Karen Amsler; Gary J Noel
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Determining the value of antimicrobial surveillance programs.

Authors:  R N Jones; R Masterton
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Ceftobiprole activity against over 60,000 clinical bacterial pathogens isolated in Europe, Turkey, and Israel from 2005 to 2010.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Robert K Flamm; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Binding of ceftobiprole and comparators to the penicillin-binding proteins of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Todd A Davies; Malcolm G P Page; Wenchi Shang; Ted Andrew; Malgosia Kania; Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Ceftobiprole- and ceftaroline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Liana C Chan; Li Basuino; Binh Diep; Stephanie Hamilton; Som S Chatterjee; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Ceftobiprole: a review of a broad-spectrum and anti-MRSA cephalosporin.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Ashley Lam; Frank Schweizer; Kristjan Thomson; Andrew Walkty; Ethan Rubinstein; Alfred S Gin; Daryl J Hoban; Ayman M Noreddin; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.403

9.  Activities of ceftobiprole, linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin against community-associated and hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Steven N Leonard; Chrissy M Cheung; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Ceftobiprole for the treatment of pneumonia: a European perspective.

Authors:  Adamantia Liapikou; Catia Cillóniz; Antonio Torres
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.162

View more
  6 in total

1.  Structural Insights into Ceftobiprole Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Penicillin-Binding Protein 3.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar; Christie Tang; Christopher R Bethel; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Jacob Wyatt; Eric Desarbre; Robert A Bonomo; Focco van den Akker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Ceftobiprole Activity against Bacteria from Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018.

Authors:  Robert K Flamm; Leonard R Duncan; Kamal A Hamed; Jennifer I Smart; Rodrigo E Mendes; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ceftobiprole versus daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a novel protocol for a double-blind, Phase III trial.

Authors:  Kamal Hamed; Marc Engelhardt; Mark E Jones; Mikael Saulay; Thomas L Holland; Harald Seifert; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Elderly-Focused on Antibiotics.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yan Zhang; Wanyu Zhao; Xiaolei Liu; Fengjuan Hu; Birong Dong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole.

Authors:  M I Morosini; M Díez-Aguilar; R Cantón
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

6.  The antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A large tertiary care university hospital experience in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Lamees A Altamimi; Leen A Altamimi; Ali M Somily
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.422

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.