Literature DB >> 29395551

Quantitative Assessment of the Coracoacromial and the Coracoclavicular Ligaments With 3-Dimensional Mapping of the Coracoid Process Anatomy: A Cadaveric Study of Surgically Relevant Structures.

Jorge Chahla1, Daniel Cole Marchetti1, Gilbert Moatshe2, Márcio B Ferrari1, George Sanchez1, Alex W Brady1, Jonas Pogorzelski1, George F Lebus3, Peter J Millett3, Robert F LaPrade3, Matthew T Provencher4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform a quantitative anatomic evaluation of the (1) coracoid process, specifically the attachment sites of the conjoint tendon, the pectoralis minor, the coracoacromial ligament (CAL), and the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments in relation to pertinent osseous and soft tissue landmarks; (2) CC ligaments' attachments on the clavicle; and (3) CAL attachment on the acromion in relation to surgically relevant anatomic landmarks to assist in planning of the Latarjet procedure, acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstructions, and CAL resection distances avoiding iatrogenic injury to surrounding structures.
METHODS: Ten nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders (mean age 52 years, range 33-64 years) were included in this study. A 3-dimensional coordinate measuring device was used to quantify the location of pertinent bony landmarks and soft tissue attachment areas. The ligament and tendon attachment perimeters and center points on the coracoid, clavicle, and acromion were identified and subsequently dissected off the bone. Coordinates of points along the perimeters of attachment sites were used to calculate areas, whereas coordinates of center points were used to determine distances between surgically relevant attachment sites and pertinent bony landmarks.
RESULTS: The CAL had a single consistent acromial attachment (mean area 77 mm [51.9, 102.2]) and then bifurcated into 2 bundles, anterior and posterior, that separately inserted on the lateral aspect of the coracoid. The footprint areas were 54.4 mm2 [31.7, 77.2] and 30.6 mm2 [23.4, 37.7] for the anterior and posterior CAL bundles, respectively. These anterior and posterior bundles attached 10.6 mm [8.4, 12.9] and 24.8 mm [12.3, 27.4] medial and proximal to the apex of the coracoid process, respectively. The minimum distance between the coracoid apex and the trapezoid ligament was 25.1 mm [22.1, 28.1] and was noted to be different in males (28.1 mm [25.1; 31.2]) and females (22.0 mm [18.2, 25.9]). The most lateral insertion of the CC ligaments on the clavicle the AC joint was 15.7 mm [13.1, 18.3]. The distance between the most medial to the most lateral point of the CC ligaments on the clavicle was 25.6 mm [22.3, 28.9], which accounted for 18.2% [15.8, 20.6] of the clavicle length.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous findings, 2 different coracoid attachments (anterior and posterior bundles) of the CAL were consistently identified in all specimens. Moreover, a coracoid osteotomy for a bone graft for the Latarjet procedure should be performed at less than 28.1/22 mm from the apex of the coracoid in male/female patients, respectively. The CC ligaments' attachments on the clavicle were located 15.7 mm from the AC joint, which should be considered for reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During the Latarjet technique, to maintain the integrity of the CC ligaments, precise knowledge of differences between male and female anatomy is necessary during a coracoid osteotomy. Furthermore, when reconstructing the AC joint, the distance from the lateral aspect of the clavicle and the size of the attachments areas should be considered to better replicate the native anatomy.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29395551     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  12 in total

1.  Coracoacromial morphology: a contributor to recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability?

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Shoulder mechanical impingement risk associated with manual wheelchair tasks in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Naveen S Murthy; Meegan G Van Straaten; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Does Preservation of Coracoacromial Ligament Reduce the Acromial Stress Pathology Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Chang Hee Baek Md; Jung Gon Kim Md; Dong Hyeon Lee Md; Gyu Rim Baek
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-06-14

4.  Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Andreas M Mueller; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Shoulder Stabilization in Females With Glenoid Bone Loss.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Hytham S Salem; Catherine Richardson; Michael O'Brien; Jon M Newgren; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Gregory P Nicholson; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Alternative Management of the Capsule in the Bristow-Latarjet Procedure.

Authors:  Travis J Dekker; Liam A Peebles; W Jeffrey Grantham; Ramesses A Akamefula; Thomas R Hackett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-09-12

7.  Morphology of the Undersurface of the Anterolateral Acromion and Its Relationship to Surrounding Structures.

Authors:  Yusuke Ueda; Akimoto Nimura; Keisuke Matsuki; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-27

8.  A guideline for screw fixation of coracoid process base fracture by 3D simulation.

Authors:  Zhongye Sun; Hao Li; Bei Wang; Jun Yan; Liren Han; Shizhang Han; Xiaofei Yang; Bei Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Anatomy and Correlation of the Coracoid Process and Coracoclavicular Ligament Based on Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Lan Xin; Jin Luo; Mingying Chen; Bing He; Bi Tang; Chunyang Tang; Dongyu Zhang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-04-24

10.  Distal Clavicular Augmentation with Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction in the Setting of Iatrogenic Induced Acromioclavicular Instability.

Authors:  Liam A Peebles; Travis J Dekker; Ramesses A Akamefula; Petar Golijanin; W Jeffrey Grantham; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.