Literature DB >> 33446228

A guideline for screw fixation of coracoid process base fracture by 3D simulation.

Zhongye Sun1, Hao Li1, Bei Wang2, Jun Yan1, Liren Han1, Shizhang Han1, Xiaofei Yang1, Bei Zhao3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the base of the coracoid process are relatively rare, but an increasing number of studies have reported using screws to fix coracoid process base fractures. This study was performed to simulate the surgical procedure and obtain the ideal diameter, length, insertion point and angle of the screw from a 3-D axial perspective in Chinese patients.
METHODS: We randomly collected right scapula computed tomography (CT) scans from 100 adults. DICOM-formatted CT scan images were imported into Mimics software. A 3D digital model of the right scapula was established. Two virtual cylinders representing two screws were placed from the top of the coracoid process to the neck of the scapula and across the base of the coracoid process to fix the base of the coracoid process. The largest secure diameters and lengths of the virtual screws were measured. The positions of the insertion points and the directions of the screws were also examined.
RESULTS: The screw insertion safe zone can exhibit an irregular fusiform shape according to the reconstructed scapula model. The mean maximum diameters of the medial and lateral screws were 7.08 ± 1.19 mm and 7.34 ± 1.11 mm, respectively. The mean maximum lengths of the medial and lateral screws were 43.11 ± 6.31 mm and 48.16 ± 6.94 mm, respectively. A screw insertion corridor with a diameter of at least 4.5 mm was found in all patients. We found sex-dependent differences in the mean maximum diameters and maximum lengths of the two screws. The positions of the two insertion points were statistically different across sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides a valuable guideline for determining the largest secure corridor for two screws in fixing a fracture at the base of the coracoid process. For ideal screw placement, we suggest individualised preoperative 3D reconstruction simulations. Further biomechanical studies are needed to verify the function of the screws.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial perspective; Coracoid process base; Digital measurement; Screw fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33446228      PMCID: PMC7809839          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02203-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  31 in total

1.  Percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures: computer-assisted determination of safe zones, angles and lengths for screw insertion.

Authors:  Paul Puchwein; Natalie Enninghorst; Krisztian Sisak; Thomas Ortner; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Zsolt J Balogh; Wolfgang Pichler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Beyond the Cuff: MR Imaging of Labroligamentous Injuries in the Athletic Shoulder.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Roy; Ian Cheyne; Gordon T Andrews; Bruce B Forster
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Treatment of coracoid process fractures associated with acromioclavicular dislocation using clavicular hook plate and coracoid screws.

Authors:  Xiangdong Duan; Huiliang Zhang; Hongbin Zhang; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Displaced fracture of the coracoid process associated with acromioclavicular dislocation: a two-bird-one-stone solution.

Authors:  Kyung-Cheon Kim; Kwang-Jin Rhee; Hyun-Dae Shin; Dong-Kyu Kim; Han-Sol Shin
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-08

5.  Axial perspective to find the largest intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the acetabular anterior column.

Authors:  XiaoReng Feng; JinTao Fang; Chaowen Lin; Sheng Zhang; WenXiong Lei; YuanHui Li; SanYuan Tang; Bin Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  An overview of thermal necrosis: present and future.

Authors:  Mohamed Mediouni; Theodore Kucklick; Sébastien Poncet; Riadh Madiouni; Amine Abouaomar; Henning Madry; Magali Cucchiarini; Bohdan Chopko; Neil Vaughan; Manit Arora; Kemal Gökkuş; Mario Lozoya Lara; Lorenlay Paiva Cedeño; Alexander Volosnikov; Mohamed Hesmati; Kevin Ho
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.

Authors:  Daniel Preece; Sarah B Williams; Richard Lam; Renate Weller
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Safety screw fixation technique in a case of coracoid base fracture with acromioclavicular dislocation and coracoid base cross-sectional size data from a computed axial tomography study.

Authors:  Yoshiteru Kawasaki; Tetsuya Hirano; Katsutoshi Miyatake; Koji Fujii; Yoshitsugu Takeda
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Fractured coracoid process in acromioclavicular dislocations. Report of four cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  T N Bernard; M E Brunet; R J Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The "coracoid tunnel view": a simulation study for finding the optimal screw trajectory in coracoid base fracture fixation.

Authors:  C H van Trikt; J G G Dobbe; J C E Donders; G J Streekstra; P Kloen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.