Literature DB >> 29392828

Arm morbidity of axillary dissection with sentinel node biopsy versus delayed axillary dissection.

Helen Ballal1, Catherine Hunt1, Chrianna Bharat2, Kevin Murray3, Roshi Kamyab1, Christobel Saunders4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer is important for prognostication and planning of adjuvant therapy. The traditional practice of proceeding to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is positive is being challenged and clinical trials are underway. For many centres, this will mean a move away from intra-operative SLNB assessment and utilization of a second procedure to perform ALND. It is sometimes perceived that a delayed ALND results in increased tissue damage and thus increased morbidity. We compared morbidity in those undergoing SLNB only, or ALND as a one- or two-stage procedure.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected institutional database was used to review rates of lymphoedema and shoulder function in women undergoing breast cancer surgery between 2008 and 2012.
RESULTS: The overall lymphoedema rate in 745 patients was 8.2% at 12 months. There was no difference in lymphoedema rates between those undergoing immediate or delayed ALND (17.8 and 8.6%, respectively, P = 0.092). Post-operative shoulder elevation, odds ratio (OR) = 0.390, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.218, 0.698) and abduction, OR = 0.437 (95% CI = (0.271, 0.705)) were reduced if an ALND was performed although there was no difference between immediate or delayed.
CONCLUSION: ALND remains a risk factor for post-operative morbidity. There is no increased risk of lymphoedema or shoulder function deficit with a positive SLNB and delayed ALND compared to immediate ALND.
© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast surgery; surgical oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29392828     DOI: 10.1111/ans.14382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  6 in total

1.  Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation Utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks Using MRI Dataset.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Jenika Karcich; Simukayi Mutasa; Reza Fardanesh; Ralph T Wynn; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Breast Lymph Nodes Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficients.

Authors:  Reza Fardanesh; Sunitha B Thakur; Varadan Sevilimedu; Joao V Horvat; Roberto Lo Gullo; Jeffrey S Reiner; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Nikita Thakur; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Thematic trends and knowledge structure map of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2019.

Authors:  Yujie Huo; Ting Fan; Si Chen; Qiannan Liu; Yue Fang; Fan Yao
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 0.496

4.  Mode of presentation and skin thickening on ultrasound may predict nodal burden in breast cancer patients with a positive axillary core biopsy.

Authors:  Wen Ling Choong; Andrew Evans; Colin A Purdie; Huan Wang; Peter T Donnan; Brooke Lawson; E Jane Macaskill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  False-negative frozen section of sentinel nodes in early breast cancer (cT1-2N0) patients.

Authors:  Zhu-Jun Loh; Kuo-Ting Lee; Ya-Ping Chen; Yao-Lung Kuo; Wei-Pang Chung; Ya-Ting Hsu; Chien-Chang Huang; Hui-Ping Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; April Zambelli-Weiner; Nicole Delgado; Ashley Sier; Robert Bauserman; Jerrod Nelms
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.872

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.