Literature DB >> 29696472

Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation Utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks Using MRI Dataset.

Richard Ha1, Peter Chang2, Jenika Karcich3, Simukayi Mutasa3, Reza Fardanesh3, Ralph T Wynn3, Michael Z Liu4, Sachin Jambawalikar4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of convolutional neural network (CNN) in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis, using a breast MRI dataset. An institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective review of our database from 1/2013 to 6/2016 identified 275 axillary lymph nodes for this study. Biopsy-proven 133 metastatic axillary lymph nodes and 142 negative control lymph nodes were identified based on benign biopsies (100) and from healthy MRI screening patients (42) with at least 3 years of negative follow-up. For each breast MRI, axillary lymph node was identified on first T1 post contrast dynamic images and underwent 3D segmentation using an open source software platform 3D Slicer. A 32 × 32 patch was then extracted from the center slice of the segmented tumor data. A CNN was designed for lymph node prediction based on each of these cropped images. The CNN consisted of seven convolutional layers and max-pooling layers with 50% dropout applied in the linear layer. In addition, data augmentation and L2 regularization were performed to limit overfitting. Training was implemented using the Adam optimizer, an algorithm for first-order gradient-based optimization of stochastic objective functions, based on adaptive estimates of lower-order moments. Code for this study was written in Python using the TensorFlow module (1.0.0). Experiments and CNN training were done on a Linux workstation with NVIDIA GTX 1070 Pascal GPU. Two class axillary lymph node metastasis prediction models were evaluated. For each lymph node, a final softmax score threshold of 0.5 was used for classification. Based on this, CNN achieved a mean five-fold cross-validation accuracy of 84.3%. It is feasible for current deep CNN architectures to be trained to predict likelihood of axillary lymph node metastasis. Larger dataset will likely improve our prediction model and can potentially be a non-invasive alternative to core needle biopsy and even sentinel lymph node evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary metastasis; CNN; MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696472      PMCID: PMC6261196          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0086-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  K L Cooper; Y Meng; S Harnan; S E Ward; P Fitzgerald; D Papaioannou; L Wyld; C Ingram; I D Wilkinson; E Lorenz
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Accuracy of axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients: an observer-performance study comparison of MRI and ultrasound.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Abe; David Schacht; Kirti Kulkarni; Akiko Shimauchi; Ken Yamaguchi; Charlene A Sennett; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Duff; A D Hill; G McGreal; S Walsh; E W McDermott; N J O'Higgins
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Preoperative axillary imaging with percutaneous lymph node biopsy is valuable in the contemporary management of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Brent C Trull; Judy C Boughey; Katie N Jones; Carol A Reynolds; Sejal S Shah; Katrina N Glazebrook
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The reliability and accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  A Pogacnik; U Klopcic; S Grazio-Frković; J Zgajnar; M Hocevar; B Vidergar-Kralj
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.073

6.  Factors impacting the accuracy of intra-operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine L Akay; Constance Albarracin; Tiffany Torstenson; Roland Bassett; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Min Yi; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Rosa F Hwang
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Is routine intraoperative frozen-section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer worthwhile?

Authors:  M R Weiser; L L Montgomery; B Susnik; L K Tan; P I Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Y-S An; D H Lee; J-K Yoon; S J Lee; T H Kim; D K Kang; K S Kim; Y S Jung; H Yim
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.379

9.  A prospective study comparing touch imprint cytology, frozen section analysis, and rapid cytokeratin immunostain for intraoperative evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anthony Lucci; Rosa F Hwang; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy Babiera; Fredrick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Merrick I Ross; Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection.

Authors:  D Ivens; A L Hoe; T J Podd; C R Hamilton; I Taylor; G T Royle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Understanding artificial intelligence based radiology studies: What is overfitting?

Authors:  Simukayi Mutasa; Shawn Sun; Richard Ha
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 2.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Detecting Abnormal Axillary Lymph Nodes on Mammograms Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Frederik Abel; Anna Landsmann; Patryk Hejduk; Carlotta Ruppert; Karol Borkowski; Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29

4.  Global-Local attention network with multi-task uncertainty loss for abnormal lymph node detection in MR images.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Yingying Zhu; Sungwon Lee; Daniel C Elton; Thomas C Shen; Youbao Tang; Yifan Peng; Zhiyong Lu; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Artificial intelligence performance in detecting tumor metastasis from medical radiology imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiuhan Zheng; Le Yang; Bin Zeng; Jiahao Li; Kaixin Guo; Yujie Liang; Guiqing Liao
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-12-25

Review 6.  Deep learning in breast imaging.

Authors:  Arka Bhowmik; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound: The Emerging Future of Modern Medicine.

Authors:  Srushti S Mahant; Anuj R Varma
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.