Literature DB >> 33245458

The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.

Chirag Shah1, April Zambelli-Weiner2, Nicole Delgado2, Ashley Sier2, Robert Bauserman2, Jerrod Nelms2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a potentially serious complication following treatment. Monitoring for progression to BCRL may allow for earlier detection and intervention, reducing the rate of progression to chronic BCRL. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of monitoring techniques on the incidence of chronic BCRL among patients monitored by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and circumference as compared to background rates.
METHODS: Eligible peer-reviewed studies from PubMed, CINHAL, or Google Scholar that were published in English from 2013 onward and conducted in North America, Europe, or Oceania. Incidence rates abstracted from studies were classified by BCRL monitoring method: background (no standardized BIS or circumference assessments), BIS or circumference. A random-effects model was used to calculate a pooled annualized estimate of BCRL incidence while accounting for clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses examined differences in duration of follow-up as well as breast and axillary surgery.
RESULTS: 50 studies were included, representing over 67,000 women. The annualized incidence of BCRL was 4.9% (95% CI: 4.3-5.5) for background studies (n = 35), 1.5% (95% CI: 0.6-2.4) for BIS-monitored studies (n = 7), and 7.7% (95% CI: 5.6-9.8) for circumference-monitored studies (n = 11). The cumulative BCRL incidence rate in BIS-monitored patients was 3.1% as compared to 12.9% with background monitoring (69% reduction) and 17.0% with circumference-monitored patients (81% reduction).
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that monitoring with BIS allowing for early intervention significantly reduces the relative risk of chronic BCRL with a 69% and 81% reduction compared to background and circumference, respectively. Circumference monitoring did not appear to provide a benefit with respect to chronic BCRL incidence. Based on these results, BIS should be considered for BCRL screening in order to detect subclinical BCRL and reduce rates of chronic BCRL, particularly in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary dissection; Bioimpedance; Breast cancer; Lymphedema

Year:  2020        PMID: 33245458      PMCID: PMC7921068          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05988-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  66 in total

1.  Prospective surveillance of breast cancer-related lymphoedema in the first-year post-surgery: feasibility and comparison of screening measures.

Authors:  J M Blaney; G McCollum; J Lorimer; J Bradley; R Kennedy; J P Rankin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Impact of body mass index and weight fluctuation on lymphedema risk in patients treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Marybeth Singer; Nora K Horick; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Jean O'Toole; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Function, Shoulder Motion, Pain, and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer With and Without Axillary Web Syndrome: An 18-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Linda A Koehler; David W Hunter; Anne H Blaes; Tufia C Haddad
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Lymphedema symptoms and limb measurement changes in breast cancer survivors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and axillary dissection: results of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071 (Alliance) substudy.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Karla V Ballman; Linda McCall; Nathan C Armer; Yuanlu Sun; Tipparat Udmuangpia; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; David R Byrd; Thomas B Julian; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Bioelectrical impedance for detecting and monitoring lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. Preliminary results of the florence nightingale breast study group.

Authors:  Zeynep Erdogan Iyigun; Derya Selamoglu; Gul Alco; Kezban Nur Pilancı; Cetin Ordu; Filiz Agacayak; Filiz Elbüken; Atilla Bozdogan; Serkan Ilgun; Fusun Guler Uysal; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.589

6.  A Prospective Validation Study of Bioimpedance with Volume Displacement in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients at Risk for Lymphedema.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Anne Eaton; Thomas G Frazier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A constitutional predisposition to breast cancer-related lymphoedema and effect of axillary lymph node surgery on forearm muscle lymph flow.

Authors:  S K Bains; A W B Stanton; V Cintolesi; J Ballinger; S Allen; C Zammit; J R Levick; P S Mortimer; A M Peters; A D Purushotham
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Risk is Related to Multidisciplinary Treatment and Not Surgery Alone: Results from a Large Cohort Study.

Authors:  Toan T Nguyen; Tanya L Hoskin; Elizabeth B Habermann; Andrea L Cheville; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  The impact of early detection and intervention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; Douglas W Arthur; David Wazer; Atif Khan; Sheila Ridner; Frank Vicini
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Mary S Dietrich; Michael S Cowher; Bret Taback; Sarah McLaughlin; Nicolas Ajkay; John Boyages; Louise Koelmeyer; Sarah M DeSnyder; Jamie Wagner; Vandana Abramson; Andrew Moore; Chirag Shah
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  3 in total

1.  Letter to the editor re: Shah et al.: "The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer‑related lymphedema: a meta‑analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements".

Authors:  Bolette Skjødt Rafn; Jan Christensen; Kira Bloomquist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Novel Wireless Bioimpedance Device for Segmental Lymphedema Analysis Post Dual-Site Free Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chang-Cheng Chang; Wei-Ling Jan; Cheng-Huei Juan; Nai-Hsin Meng; Bor-Shyh Lin; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis for early screening of upper limb subclinical lymphedema: A case-control study.

Authors:  Linli Zhuang; Huaying Chen; Xuemei Zheng; Shaoyong Wu; Youhui Yu; Lu Lan; Liang Xu; Jumei Xu; Hongying Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.