Literature DB >> 29392409

Concordance of Gleason grading with three-dimensional ultrasound systematic biopsy and biopsy core pre-embedding.

Anouk A M A van der Aa1,2, Christophe K Mannaerts3, Hans van der Linden4, Maudy Gayet5,6, Bart Ph Schrier5, Massimo Mischi6, Harrie P Beerlage5,6, Hessel Wijkstra6,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the value of a three-dimensional (3D) greyscale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy system and biopsy core pre-embedding method on concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prostate biopsies and subsequent RP for PCa in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands, from 2007 to 2016. Two cohorts were analysed: conventional 2D TRUS-guided biopsies and RP (2007-2013, n = 266) versus 3D TRUS-guided biopsies with pre-embedding (2013-2016, n = 129). The impact of 3D TRUS-guidance with pre-embedding on Gleason score (GS) concordance between biopsy and RP was evaluated using the κ-coefficient. Predictors of biopsy GS 6 upgrading were assessed using logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Gleason concordance was comparable between the two cohorts with a κ = 0.44 for the 3D cohort, compared to κ = 0.42 for the 2D cohort. 3D TRUS-guidance with pre-embedding, did not significantly affect the risk of biopsy GS 6 upgrading in univariate and multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D TRUS-guidance with biopsy core pre-embedding did not improve Gleason concordance. Improved detection techniques are needed for recognition of low-grade disease upgrading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Neoplasm grading; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Three-dimensional imaging; Tissue embedding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29392409     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2209-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  31 in total

1.  Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters.

Authors:  Can Öbek; Tünkut Doğanca; Sinan Erdal; Sarper Erdoğan; Haydar Durak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: A comparison of needle segmentation accuracy with two-dimensional image guidance.

Authors:  William Thomas Hrinivich; Douglas A Hoover; Kathleen Surry; Chandima Edirisinghe; Jacques Montreuil; David D'Souza; Aaron Fenster; Eugene Wong
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Additional elastography-targeted biopsy improves the agreement between biopsy Gleason grade and Gleason grade at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Katharina Boehm; Pierre Tennstedt; Burkhard Beyer; Jonas Schiffmann; Ann Beckmann; Uwe Michl; Dirk Beyersdorff; Lars Budäus; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy: Effect of Preoperative Risk on Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Mariam Imnadze; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Upgrading of Gleason score and prostate volume: a clinicopathological analysis.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Sey Kiat Lim; Tae-Young Shin; Joo Yong Lee; Byung Ha Chung; Koon Ho Rha; Sung Joon Hong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known?

Authors:  Manish A Vira; Thomas Guzzo; Daniel F Heitjan; John E Tomaszewski; Anthony D'Amico; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Direct comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results with final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/ultrasonography-fusion biopsy.

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz; Ivan Platzek; Marieta Toma; Theresa Renner; Roman Herout; Martin Baunacke; Michael Laniado; Gustavo Baretton; Michael Froehner; Stefan Zastrow; Manfred Wirth
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alexandre Peltier; Fouad Aoun; Fouad El-Khoury; Eric Hawaux; Ksenija Limani; Krishna Narahari; Nicolas Sirtaine; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.