Literature DB >> 26481227

Additional elastography-targeted biopsy improves the agreement between biopsy Gleason grade and Gleason grade at radical prostatectomy.

Katharina Boehm1,2, Pierre Tennstedt3, Burkhard Beyer3, Jonas Schiffmann3, Ann Beckmann3,4, Uwe Michl3, Dirk Beyersdorff4,5, Lars Budäus3,4, Markus Graefen3, Pierre I Karakiewicz6,7, Georg Salomon3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether real-time elastography-targeted biopsy (RTE-bx) may help to correctly assign Gleason grade at radical prostatectomy (RP) and to compare discriminant properties of systematic biopsy alone (sbx) versus combination with RTE-bx (comb-bx) to distinguish between postoperatively favorable (Gleason 3 + 3, pT2, Nx/0) and postoperatively unfavorable (Gleason ≥4 + 4) prostate cancer (PCa) at RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 259 patients diagnosed with PCa at systematic biopsy in combination with RTE-bx underwent RP between 2008 and 2011. Gleason Score derived from sbx versus comb-bx was compared to the gold-standard RP, and discriminant properties were assessed. Specificity gains were examined for sbx versus comb-bx when the endpoint consisted of postoperatively favorable PCa at RP. Sensitivity gains were examined, when analyses focused on postoperatively unfavorable PCa.
RESULTS: Comb-bx resulted in higher correct overall Gleason assignment (68.3 vs. 56.7 %, p = 0.008) than sbx. Similarly, lower rates of undergrading (21.2 vs. 36.3 %, p < 0.001) were recorded. Specificity gains with comb-bx were 10 % (92 vs. 82 %, p = 0.004) for postoperatively favorable PCa. Comb-bx resulted in 31 % sensitivity gains relative to sbx (94 vs. 63 %, p = 0.03), when postoperatively unfavorable PCa was the endpoint.
CONCLUSION: The agreement between biopsy and pathology Gleason Score was significantly higher for comb-bx than sbx. Additionally, comb-bx reduced the rate of false positives in the diagnosis of favorable PCa. Rates of correctly classified unfavorable PCa at RP were also higher for comb-bx. Those data indicate that comb-bx is useful in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic; Elastography; Gleason grade assignment; Imaging; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26481227     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1714-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. 1974.

Authors:  Donald F Gleason; George T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  Katharina König; Ulrich Scheipers; Andreas Pesavento; Andreas Lorenz; Helmut Ermert; Theodor Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Thomas Steuber; Andreas Erbersdobler; Eike Currlin; Jochen Walz; Thorsten Schlomm; Alexander Haese; Hans Heinzer; Michael McCormack; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Incremental detection rate of prostate cancer by real-time elastography targeted biopsies in combination with a conventional 10-core biopsy in 1024 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Nils Drews; Philippe Autier; Ann Beckmann; Hans Heinzer; Jens Hansen; Uwe Michl; Thorsten Schlomm; Alex Haese; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Andreas Becker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

Authors:  D F Gleason; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Thomas Hambrock; Derya Yakar; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Ton Feuth; J Alfred Witjes; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prostate cancer sampled on sextant needle biopsy: significance of cancer on multiple cores from different areas of the prostate.

Authors:  J I Epstein; K Lecksell; H B Carter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Thorsten Schlomm; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread.

Authors:  J E McNeal; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Potentials and limitations of real-time elastography for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step section analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Georg Schäfer; Friedrich Aigner; Peter Schullian; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-31
View more
  4 in total

1.  Concordance of Gleason grading with three-dimensional ultrasound systematic biopsy and biopsy core pre-embedding.

Authors:  Anouk A M A van der Aa; Christophe K Mannaerts; Hans van der Linden; Maudy Gayet; Bart Ph Schrier; Massimo Mischi; Harrie P Beerlage; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Assessment of elastographic Q-analysis score combined with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) fusion-guided biopsy in differentiating benign and malignant prostate.

Authors:  Hongtian Tian; Zhimin Ding; Huaiyu Wu; Keen Yang; Di Song; Jinfeng Xu; Fajin Dong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

3.  Prostate cancer rates in patients with initially negative elastography-targeted biopsy vs. systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Jeannette Kratzenberg; Georg Salomon; Pierre Tennstedt; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Derya Tilki; Axel Haferkamp; Markus Graefen; Katharina Boehm
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Focal Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Correlative Pathological and Radiographic-Based Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Elisha Fredman; Bryan Traughber; Michael Kharouta; Tarun Podder; Simon Lo; Lee Ponsky; Gregory MacLennan; Raj Paspulati; Bradley Ellis; Mitchell Machtay; Rodney Ellis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.