Katharina Boehm1,2, Pierre Tennstedt3, Burkhard Beyer3, Jonas Schiffmann3, Ann Beckmann3,4, Uwe Michl3, Dirk Beyersdorff4,5, Lars Budäus3,4, Markus Graefen3, Pierre I Karakiewicz6,7, Georg Salomon3,4. 1. Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. boehm@martini-klinik.de. 2. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, 264 Blvd. Rene-Levesque E. Room 228, Montreal, QC, H2X 1P1, Canada. boehm@martini-klinik.de. 3. Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Unit, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 6. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, 264 Blvd. Rene-Levesque E. Room 228, Montreal, QC, H2X 1P1, Canada. 7. Department of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether real-time elastography-targeted biopsy (RTE-bx) may help to correctly assign Gleason grade at radical prostatectomy (RP) and to compare discriminant properties of systematic biopsy alone (sbx) versus combination with RTE-bx (comb-bx) to distinguish between postoperatively favorable (Gleason 3 + 3, pT2, Nx/0) and postoperatively unfavorable (Gleason ≥4 + 4) prostate cancer (PCa) at RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 259 patients diagnosed with PCa at systematic biopsy in combination with RTE-bx underwent RP between 2008 and 2011. Gleason Score derived from sbx versus comb-bx was compared to the gold-standard RP, and discriminant properties were assessed. Specificity gains were examined for sbx versus comb-bx when the endpoint consisted of postoperatively favorable PCa at RP. Sensitivity gains were examined, when analyses focused on postoperatively unfavorable PCa. RESULTS: Comb-bx resulted in higher correct overall Gleason assignment (68.3 vs. 56.7 %, p = 0.008) than sbx. Similarly, lower rates of undergrading (21.2 vs. 36.3 %, p < 0.001) were recorded. Specificity gains with comb-bx were 10 % (92 vs. 82 %, p = 0.004) for postoperatively favorable PCa. Comb-bx resulted in 31 % sensitivity gains relative to sbx (94 vs. 63 %, p = 0.03), when postoperatively unfavorable PCa was the endpoint. CONCLUSION: The agreement between biopsy and pathology Gleason Score was significantly higher for comb-bx than sbx. Additionally, comb-bx reduced the rate of false positives in the diagnosis of favorable PCa. Rates of correctly classified unfavorable PCa at RP were also higher for comb-bx. Those data indicate that comb-bx is useful in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To assess whether real-time elastography-targeted biopsy (RTE-bx) may help to correctly assign Gleason grade at radical prostatectomy (RP) and to compare discriminant properties of systematic biopsy alone (sbx) versus combination with RTE-bx (comb-bx) to distinguish between postoperatively favorable (Gleason 3 + 3, pT2, Nx/0) and postoperatively unfavorable (Gleason ≥4 + 4) prostate cancer (PCa) at RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 259 patients diagnosed with PCa at systematic biopsy in combination with RTE-bx underwent RP between 2008 and 2011. Gleason Score derived from sbx versus comb-bx was compared to the gold-standard RP, and discriminant properties were assessed. Specificity gains were examined for sbx versus comb-bx when the endpoint consisted of postoperatively favorable PCa at RP. Sensitivity gains were examined, when analyses focused on postoperatively unfavorable PCa. RESULTS:Comb-bx resulted in higher correct overall Gleason assignment (68.3 vs. 56.7 %, p = 0.008) than sbx. Similarly, lower rates of undergrading (21.2 vs. 36.3 %, p < 0.001) were recorded. Specificity gains with comb-bx were 10 % (92 vs. 82 %, p = 0.004) for postoperatively favorable PCa. Comb-bx resulted in 31 % sensitivity gains relative to sbx (94 vs. 63 %, p = 0.03), when postoperatively unfavorable PCa was the endpoint. CONCLUSION: The agreement between biopsy and pathology Gleason Score was significantly higher for comb-bx than sbx. Additionally, comb-bx reduced the rate of false positives in the diagnosis of favorable PCa. Rates of correctly classified unfavorable PCa at RP were also higher for comb-bx. Those data indicate that comb-bx is useful in clinical practice.
Authors: Katharina König; Ulrich Scheipers; Andreas Pesavento; Andreas Lorenz; Helmut Ermert; Theodor Senge Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Felix K-H Chun; Thomas Steuber; Andreas Erbersdobler; Eike Currlin; Jochen Walz; Thorsten Schlomm; Alexander Haese; Hans Heinzer; Michael McCormack; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Georg Salomon; Nils Drews; Philippe Autier; Ann Beckmann; Hans Heinzer; Jens Hansen; Uwe Michl; Thorsten Schlomm; Alex Haese; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Andreas Becker Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Caroline M A Hoeks; Thomas Hambrock; Derya Yakar; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Ton Feuth; J Alfred Witjes; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Thorsten Schlomm; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Daniel Junker; Georg Schäfer; Friedrich Aigner; Peter Schullian; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2012-12-31
Authors: Anouk A M A van der Aa; Christophe K Mannaerts; Hans van der Linden; Maudy Gayet; Bart Ph Schrier; Massimo Mischi; Harrie P Beerlage; Hessel Wijkstra Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jeannette Kratzenberg; Georg Salomon; Pierre Tennstedt; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Derya Tilki; Axel Haferkamp; Markus Graefen; Katharina Boehm Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-01-13 Impact factor: 4.226