Literature DB >> 29391020

Suppressive regulatory T cells and latent transforming growth factor-β-expressing macrophages are altered in the peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis.

Tetsuro Hanada1, Shunichiro Tsuji2, Misako Nakayama3, Shiro Wakinoue1, Kyoko Kasahara1, Fuminori Kimura1, Takahide Mori4, Kazumasa Ogasawara3, Takashi Murakami1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a known cause of infertility. Differences in immune tolerance caused by regulatory T cells (Tregs) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) are thought to be involved in the pathology of endometriosis. Evidence has indicated that Tregs can be separated into three functionally and phenotypically distinct subpopulations and that activated TGF-β is released from latency-associated peptide (LAP) on the surfaces of specific cells. The aim of this study was to examine differences in Treg subpopulations and LAP in the peripheral blood (PB) and peritoneal fluid (PF) of patients with and without endometriosis.
METHODS: PB and PF were collected from 28 women with laparoscopically and histopathologically diagnosed endometriosis and 20 disease-free women who were subjected to laparoscopic surgery. Three subpopulations of CD4+ T lymphocytes (CD45RA+FoxP3low resting Tregs, CD45RA-FoxP3high effector Tregs, and CD45RA-FoxP3low non-Tregs) and CD11b+ mononuclear cells expressing LAP were analyzed by flow cytometry using specific monoclonal antibodies.
RESULTS: Proportions of suppressive Tregs (resting and effector Tregs) were significantly higher in the PF samples of patients with endometriosis than in those of control women (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively) but did not differ between the PB samples of patients and controls. The percentage of CD11b+LAP+ macrophages was significantly lower in PF samples of patients with endometriosis than in those of controls (P < 0.01) but was not altered in the PB samples.
CONCLUSION: Proportions of suppressive Tregs and LAP+ macrophages are altered locally in the PF of endometriosis patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometriosis; Latency-associated peptide; Regulatory T cell; TGF-β

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29391020      PMCID: PMC5796574          DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0325-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol        ISSN: 1477-7827            Impact factor:   5.211


Background

Endometriosis, defined by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus, is a common, chronic, estrogen-dependent disease contributing to dysmenorrhea and infertility. One leading theory hypothesizes that peritoneal lesions are derived from steroid hormone-sensitive endometrial cells and tissues that are implanted on the peritoneal surface during retrograde menstruation, eliciting an inflammatory response. Although most women exhibit retrograde menstruation, affected women may suffer from immune dysfunction that interferes with the clearing of such lesions [1]. FoxP3-expressing CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an indispensable role in the maintenance of self-tolerance and immune homeostasis [2] and are involved in various human diseases, such as autoimmune diseases, allergies, and cancer [3-5]. FoxP3+ cells, however, are heterogeneous in function and phenotype. Miyara et al. suggested that human FoxP3-expressing CD4+ Tregs can be separated into three functionally and phenotypically distinct subpopulations: 1) CD45RA+FoxP3low resting Tregs (rTregs), 2) CD45RA−FoxP3high effector Tregs (eTregs), and 3) cytokine-secreting CD45RA−FoxP3low non-Tregs (non-Tregs) [6, 7]. rTregs and eTregs have been shown to be suppressive Tregs, whereas non-Tregs are non-suppressive. Although rTregs do not exhibit proliferative potential in vitro, upon antigenic stimulation, they acquire an eTreg phenotype, i.e., FoxP3 is upregulated, followed by proliferation and eventual differentiation into eTregs. In humans, conflicting results have been obtained regarding whether populations of Tregs in the peritoneal fluid (PF) or peripheral blood (PB) differ significantly between patients with endometriosis and controls [8-10]. Moreover, the association between endometriosis and Treg subpopulations has not been well studied. Thus, in this study, we focused on assessing the association of each Treg subpopulation with endometriosis. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) induces FoxP3+ Tregs and inhibits the proliferation of immune cells and cytokine production via FoxP3-dependent and -independent mechanisms [11]. TGF-β is secreted as an inactive form that is trapped by latency-associated peptide (LAP) to form the small latent complex. The addition of the latent TGF-β-binding protein forms the large latent complex, which is deposited onto the extracellular matrix. After being released from LAP, activated TGF-β plays important roles in the control of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [12]. According to several studies, a strong association between TGF-β levels in PF and endometriosis has been observed [13]. PF mainly comprises macrophages, with smaller numbers of lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and mesothelial cells [14, 15]. However, the contribution of activated TGF-β released from macrophages remains unclear, as the surface expression of LAP on the macrophages of endometriosis patients has not yet been determined. Therefore, in the present study, we assessed the immunotolerance of patients with endometriosis by analyzing Treg subpopulations and LAP expression in macrophages and monocytes derived from the PF and PB, respectively, of patients with endometriosis and controls.

Methods

Patients

This single-center study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiga University of Medical Science (approval number: 26–217) prior to patient recruitment. Patients were recruited the day before surgery when they were hospitalized in the University Hospital. All participants were Japanese, and only women who still exhibited a menstrual cycle were recruited; patients who were menstruating at the time of admission were not recruited. All patients accepted the recruitment, and they were distributed into endometriosis group or control group based on the findings of laparoscopic surgery and post-surgical histopathology. Five patients were excluded (4 due to insufficient volume of the PF and 1 due to an acute inflammatory finding during surgery and a diagnosis of chlamydia peritonitis after surgery), and a total of 28 women diagnosed with endometriosis (mean age: 34.3 years, range: 23–46 years) were enrolled. All patients with endometriosis were classified as stage I–IV according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification [16]. In the endometriosis group, 12 patients were in the proliferative phase, and 16 were in the secretory phase. Patients without visible endometriotic foci and pelvic inflammation who underwent laparoscopic excision of benign ovarian tumors and uterine myomas or diagnostic laparoscopy for infertility were assigned to the control group. A total of 20 women were enrolled in the control group (mean age: 36.1 years, range: 19–46 years). In the control group, 10 were in the proliferative phase, and 10 were in the secretory phase. Samples in the proliferative phase were collected on days 5–10 of the menstrual cycle, and samples in the secretory phase were collected on days 3–10 after ovulation. None of the patients were being treated with pharmacological medications, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, low-dose estrogen and progestin, or dienogest, and all patients were free from other acute or chronic inflammatory diseases. Table 1 shows a summary of patient characteristics, including phase of the menstrual cycle and stage of endometriosis.
Table 1

Summary of patient characteristics

EndometriosisControl P value
(n = 28)(n = 20)
Age in years, mean (range)34.3 (23–46)36.1 (19–36)0.13
BMI, mean (range)20.3 (17.3–24.0)21.0 (18.5–25.7)0.45
Gravida, mean (range)0.68 (0–2)1.0 (0–4)0.67
Para, mean (range)0.39 (0–2)0.75 (0–3)0.46
Smokersnone1Not applicable
Stage of Menstrual CycleProliferative1210Not applicable
Secretory1610Not applicable
Stage of EndometriosisI7Not applicable
II6
III11
IV4

Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests

Summary of patient characteristics Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests

Sample collection

PB samples were obtained from patients and controls and were added to heparin-containing tubes within 24 h of surgery. PB mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from residual blood cells by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline by centrifugation at 400×g for 10 min. PF was aspirated by a laparoscopic procedure and added to heparin-containing tubes. The supernatant from the ascites was collected by centrifugation at 400×g for 5 min. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated following the same method used for PBMCs. All samples were transferred to our laboratory within 30 min of collection, and the aforementioned procedure was started immediately.

Monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies against CD4-FITC (RPA-T4), CD11b-APC (ICRF44), CD45RA-APC (5H9), and FoxP3-PE (259D/C7) were purchased from Becton Dickinson (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). LAP-PE (clone 27,232) was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Mouse IgG1-FITC, mouse IgG1-PE, and mouse IgG1-APC were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA) and were used as isotype-matched negative controls. Human Fc receptor blocker was purchased from Becton Dickinson. Ethidium monoazide bromide was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR, USA).

Flow cytometry analysis

For Treg assays, PBMCs and MNCs were blocked with human Fc receptor blocker for 10 min on ice and stained for 20 min on ice in the dark using antibodies against CD4 and CD45RA. After washing, the cells were stained with ethidium monoazide bromide for 20 min on ice and permeabilized using a FoxP3 Staining Kit (Becton Dickinson), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were analyzed using a FACS Aria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), and 20,000 CD4+ cells were obtained (Fig. 1a and b). For monocyte and macrophage LAP staining assays, PBMCs and MNCs were stained to detect CD11b and LAP. Cells were analyzed using a FACS Aria flow cytometer, and 20,000 CD11b+ cells were obtained (Fig. 1c and d).
Fig. 1

Determination of frequencies of Tregs and LAP+ macrophages and monocytes. a, b Gating of CD4+ T lymphocytes and determination of the proportions of three subpopulations in the peripheral blood (a) and peritoneal fluid (b): CD45RA+FoxP3low resting Tregs (rTregs), CD45RA−FoxP3high effector Tregs (eTregs), and CD45RA−FoxP3low non-Tregs (non-Tregs). c, d Side light scattering and staining with CD11b gating to detect CD11b+ monocytes and macrophages from the peripheral blood (c) and peritoneal fluid (d). e Staining with isotype control, CD11b+LAP+ monocytes from the peripheral blood, and CD11b+LAP+ macrophages from the peritoneal fluid

Determination of frequencies of Tregs and LAP+ macrophages and monocytes. a, b Gating of CD4+ T lymphocytes and determination of the proportions of three subpopulations in the peripheral blood (a) and peritoneal fluid (b): CD45RA+FoxP3low resting Tregs (rTregs), CD45RA−FoxP3high effector Tregs (eTregs), and CD45RA−FoxP3low non-Tregs (non-Tregs). c, d Side light scattering and staining with CD11b gating to detect CD11b+ monocytes and macrophages from the peripheral blood (c) and peritoneal fluid (d). e Staining with isotype control, CD11b+LAP+ monocytes from the peripheral blood, and CD11b+LAP+ macrophages from the peritoneal fluid

Evaluation of TGF-β concentration in the PF

The frozen plasma samples of the PF were preserved at − 80 °C until analysis. Subsequently, the samples were sent to SRL Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) for evaluation of the concentration of TGF-β1 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a Quantikine human TGF-β1 immunoassay (R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN, USA), which was performed according to the manufacture’s recommendation.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-tests. Fisher’s exact tests were performed for comparisons between two groups. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Treg subpopulations in the PF and PB of patients with endometriosis and controls

We gated CD4+ T lymphocytes and determined the proportions of three subpopulations of cells in the PB and PF: CD45RA+FoxP3low rTregs, CD45RA−FoxP3high eTregs, and CD45RA−FoxP3low non-Tregs (Fig. 1a and b). We did not detect cyclical changes in these subpopulations in patients with endometriosis or controls (Table 2). FACS analysis revealed that the frequencies of rTregs and eTregs in the PF were significantly higher in the endometriosis group (medians: 0.60% and 3.4%, respectively) than in the control group [medians: 0.25% (P = 0.02) and 1.7% (P < 0.01), respectively]; however, these did not differ between the two groups in the PB [median rTregs: 1.4% (endometriosis) and 1.9% (control), P = 0.31; median eTregs: 0.70% (endometriosis) and 0.90% (control), P = 0.29] (Fig. 2a and b). There were no significant differences in non-Tregs between patients and controls in either the PB or PF (Fig. 2c). Significant differences were also observed in comparisons based on the menstrual cycle stage (Table 3). Comparison of rTregs and eTregs in the PF with severity of endometriosis (rASRM stage I and II vs. III and IV) showed no significant difference between the two groups [median rTregs: 0.75% (stage I and II) and 0.65% (stage III and IV), P = 0.59; median eTregs: 2.8% (stage I and II) and 3.6% (stage III and IV), P = 0.28].
Table 2

Comparison of Treg subpopulations, LAP+CD11b+ monocytes, and TGF-β between proliferative and secretory phases in each group (mean ± SD)

Peritoneal fluid
PhaserTregs (%) P eTregs (%) P nonTregs (%) P LAP+CD11b + Macrophages P TGF-β P
EndometriosisProliferative (n = 12)0.73 ± 0.56ns3.9 ± 1.7ns7.7 ± 2.7ns13.0 ± 14.4ns1.12 ± 0.57ns
Secretory (n = 16)0.82 ± 0.753.1 ± 2.86.0 ± 3.012.1 ± 16.41.09 ± 0.32
ControlProliferative (n = 10)0.47 ± 0.60ns2.2 ± 1.5ns5.8 ± 2.1ns80.0 ± 19.7ns0.85 ± 0.26ns
Secretory (n = 10)0.30 ± 0.241.8 ± 1.38.6 ± 1.681.3 ± 17.30.79 ± 0.26
Peripheral blood
PhaserTregs (%) P eTregs (%) P nonTregs (%) P LAP+CD11b + Monocytes P
EndometriosisProliferative (n = 12)1.3 ± 0.61ns1.2 ± 2.2ns2.4 ± 1.9ns83.5 ± 16.7ns
Secretory (n = 16)2.1 ± 1.60.9 ± 1.03.0 ± 1.880.3 ± 19.7
ControlProliferative (n = 10)1.3 ± 2.6ns1.2 ± 0.8ns4.4 ± 2.6ns79.2 ± 19.1ns
Secretory (n = 10)0.8 ± 2.80.8 ± 0.43.9 ± 2.285.9 ± 11.5

Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests. ns, not significant

Fig. 2

Proportion of Tregs in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis and controls. Proportions of CD45RA+FoxP3low (rTregs) (a), CD45RA−FoxP3high (eTregs) (b), and CD45RA−FoxP3low (non-Tregs) cells (c) among the CD4+ population in the peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis (EN, n = 28) and controls (CN, n = 10). Horizontal bars represent medians. Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests

Table 3

Comparison of Treg subpopulations, LAP+CD11b+ monocytes, and TGF-β concentrations in proliferative and secretory phases (mean ± SD) between endometriosis and control groups

Peritoneal fluid
ProliferativerTregs (%) P eTregs (%) P nonTregs (%) P LAP+CD11b + Macrophages P TGF-β P
 Endometriosis (n = 12)0.73 ± 0.56< 0.053.9 ± 1.7< 0.057.7 ± 2.7ns13.0 ± 14.4< 0.051.12 ± 0.57< 0.05
 Control (n = 10)0.47 ± 0.602.2 ± 1.55.8 ± 2.180.0 ± 19.70.85 ± 0.26
SecretoryrTregs (%) P eTregs (%) P nonTregs (%) P LAP+CD11b + Macrophages P TGF-β P
 Endometriosis (n = 16)0.82 ± 0.75< 0.053.1 ± 2.8< 0.056.0 ± 3.0ns12.1 ± 16.4< 0.051.09 ± 0.32< 0.05
 Control (n = 10)0.30 ± 0.241.8 ± 1.38.6 ± 1.681.3 ± 17.30.79 ± 0.26
Peripheral blood
ProliferativerTregs (%) P eTregs (%) P nonTregs (%) P LAP+CD11b + Monocytes P
 Endometriosis (n = 12)1.3 ± 0.61ns1.2 ± 2.2ns2.4 ± 1.9ns83.5 ± 16.7ns
 Control (n = 10)1.3 ± 2.61.2 ± 0.84.4 ± 2.679.2 ± 19.1
SecretoryrTregs (%) P eTregs (%) P nonTregs (%) P LAP+CD11b + Monocytes P
 Endometriosis (n = 12)2.1 ± 1.6ns0.9 ± 1.0ns3.0 ± 1.8ns80.3 ± 19.7ns
 Control (n = 10)0.8 ± 2.80.8 ± 0.43.9 ± 2.285.9 ± 11.5

Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests. ns, not significant

Comparison of Treg subpopulations, LAP+CD11b+ monocytes, and TGF-β between proliferative and secretory phases in each group (mean ± SD) Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests. ns, not significant Proportion of Tregs in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis and controls. Proportions of CD45RA+FoxP3low (rTregs) (a), CD45RA−FoxP3high (eTregs) (b), and CD45RA−FoxP3low (non-Tregs) cells (c) among the CD4+ population in the peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis (EN, n = 28) and controls (CN, n = 10). Horizontal bars represent medians. Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests Comparison of Treg subpopulations, LAP+CD11b+ monocytes, and TGF-β concentrations in proliferative and secretory phases (mean ± SD) between endometriosis and control groups Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests. ns, not significant

CD11b+LAP+ MNCs in the PF and PB of patients with endometriosis

PBMCs and MNCs were examined using side light scattering and analysis of CD11b expression to detect monocytes and macrophages by flow cytometry (Fig. 1c and d). We then determined the frequencies of LAP+ cells among CD11b+ monocytes and macrophages in the PB and PF (Fig. 1e). We did not detect cyclical changes in the proportions of LAP+ macrophages in patients with endometriosis or controls (Table 2). We found that the proportion of LAP+ macrophages in the PF was significantly lower in patients with endometriosis (median: 6.2%) than in controls (median: 21.2%, P < 0.01), as shown in Fig. 3. There were no significant differences in the proportion of LAP+ monocytes in the PB of patients with endometriosis and controls (median: 89.4% and 89.2%, respectively; P = 0.86). Significant differences were also observed in comparisons based on the menstrual cycle stage (Table 3). Comparison of LAP+ macrophages in the PF with severity of endometriosis (rASRM stage I and II vs. III and IV) showed no significant difference between the two groups [median 31.1% (stage I and II) and 13.7% (stage III and IV), P = 0.23].
Fig. 3

CD11b+LAP+ cells in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis and controls. Endometriosis, EN (n = 28); control, CN (n = 20). Horizontal bars represent medians. Columns and vertical bars indicate the 25th–75th percentiles and 10th–90th percentiles, respectively. Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests

CD11b+LAP+ cells in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis and controls. Endometriosis, EN (n = 28); control, CN (n = 20). Horizontal bars represent medians. Columns and vertical bars indicate the 25th–75th percentiles and 10th–90th percentiles, respectively. Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-tests The concentration of TGF-β in the PF was significantly increased in patients with endometriosis (median 1.08 ng/mL) compared with that in the controls (median 0.75 ng/mL, P < 0.01, as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that frequencies of rTregs and eTregs in the PF were higher in patients with endometriosis than in controls, but this pattern was not observed in the PB. In Papio anubis, induction of endometriosis alters the peripheral and endometrial populations of Tregs [17], whereas in humans, several studies have shown that Tregs are present in eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissues [18, 19] and that FOXP3 mRNA levels are elevated in human endometriotic lesions [20]. These findings and our results together suggest that in humans, elevations in rTregs and eTregs in patients with endometriosis are not systemic but are locally induced in the peritoneal cavity. In contrast, in a recent report, there were no significant differences in Treg subpopulations in the PF of individuals with or without endometriosis [21]. The discrepancy in this result from ours may be caused by the different methods used to analyze Treg subpopulations: in this previous study, specimens were stored at − 80 °C before analysis by flow cytometry, and all specimens were obtained from patients with severe endometriosis. It has been reported that cryopreservation and thawing of specimens alter the phenotype and function of Tregs [22, 23]. Our results also demonstrated low LAP expression on the surfaces of macrophages in the PF of patients with endometriosis. Macrophage numbers are increased in the peritoneal cavities of women with endometriosis [24, 25]; therefore, the present study focused on macrophages in the PF. Disruption of the noncovalent interactions between LAP and TGF-β by either conformational changes or the complete dissociation of LAP can be induced under extreme conditions, e.g. extreme pH, heat, or the presence of serine protease plasmin, thrombospondin-1, reactive oxygen species, or integrin αγβ6 [26-28]. Active TGF-β can be released following this disruption, limiting tissue repair and promoting the development of tissue fibrosis [29-31]. Elevated concentrations of TGF-β in the PF of patients with endometriosis have been repeatedly reported [13, 32], and this result was further confirmed in our study (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Our results suggest that activated TGF-β released from the latent complex on macrophage surfaces may act to decrease LAP expression and increase the concentration of TGF-β in the PF of patients with endometriosis. The overexpression of TGF-β has been implicated in fibrotic diseases of the kidney, liver, lung, skin, and other organs, and trapping TGF-β by increasing the expression of LAP in organ-specific cells leads to the suppression of fibrosis in the skin, hepatic tissue, and renal tissue [29, 33, 34]. Thus, higher levels of TGF-β may account for the peritoneal tissue fibrosis found in patients with endometriosis and are related to the severity of endometriosis [35]. In 2015, the results of a phase II clinical trial of fresolimumab, a neutralizing antibody against TGF-β1, β2, and β3, for skin sclerosis were reported. Fresolimumab treatment did not change the thickness of the dermis, but decreased the number of myofibroblasts [36]. Clinical studies using molecular targeted drugs for treatment of endometriosis have not yet been conducted, but monoclonal antibodies against TGF-β and LAP may be a promising approach for control of the disease. As this is a cross-sectional study, it is difficult to determine whether the changes in TGF-β, LAP+ macrophages and suppressive Tregs are the cause or result of endometriosis; moreover, the trigger for LAP release also remains unknown. Though our data suggest a potential source of activated TGF-β, namely the reduced LAP expression on the surfaces of macrophages, TGF-β is produced by several types of cells including immune cells [37], and it has been reported that the peritoneum is a source of TGF-β in patients with endometriosis [38]. Additionally, as rASRM classification is based on macroscopic findings, potential endometriosis patients might be included in the control group, resulting in some data overlap between the groups. Regarding the limitation of the laboratory method, it is difficult to completely eliminate leucocytes from the PF derived from the PB due to contamination during operation. Furthermore, the participants of this study may include patients with dysmenorrhea symptoms such as pelvic pain and excessive menstruation, and infertility. There are some reports that endometriosis is related to infertility, pain, socioeconomic condition, stress, nickel allergy, vitamin D intake [39-42], and these potential confounding factors cannot be excluded completely with only the variabilities that we adjusted. However, owing to the small sample size of this study, it was difficult to adjust for all of these factors. We believe that such studies could clarify the pathophysiology of endometriosis and establish new treatment modalities.

Conclusions

Our results revealed increases in the proportions of rTregs and eTregs in the PF of women with endometriosis, as well as reduced expression of LAP on macrophages, resulting in the release of activated TGF-β. These observations may be associated with suppressed immune responses, which may initiate and promote endometriosis in the pelvic cavity. Further studies on the relevance of Tregs and LAP-TGF-β are needed, and elucidation of this cascade may lead to the establishment of effective approaches for the control of endometriosis.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Role of cytokines in endometriosis.

Authors:  T Harada; T Iwabe; N Terakawa
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  The latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein (LTBP) family.

Authors:  R Oklü; R Hesketh
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Deficient cellular immunity in endometriosis.

Authors:  W P Dmowski; R W Steele; G F Baker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-10-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Modulation of transforming growth factor beta response and signaling during transdifferentiation of rat hepatic stellate cells to myofibroblasts.

Authors:  S Dooley; B Delvoux; B Lahme; K Mangasser-Stephan; A M Gressner
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Latent transforming growth factor-beta: structural features and mechanisms of activation.

Authors:  J S Munger; J G Harpel; P E Gleizes; R Mazzieri; I Nunes; D B Rifkin
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  CD4⁺ CD25⁺ FOXP3⁺ regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis.

Authors:  Joanna Olkowska-Truchanowicz; Katarzyna Bocian; Radosław B Maksym; Agata Białoszewska; Dariusz Włodarczyk; Włodzimierz Baranowski; Jakub Ząbek; Grażyna Korczak-Kowalska; Jacek Malejczyk
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Fresolimumab treatment decreases biomarkers and improves clinical symptoms in systemic sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Lisa M Rice; Cristina M Padilla; Sarah R McLaughlin; Allison Mathes; Jessica Ziemek; Salma Goummih; Sashidhar Nakerakanti; Michael York; Giuseppina Farina; Michael L Whitfield; Robert F Spiera; Romy B Christmann; Jessica K Gordon; Janice Weinberg; Robert W Simms; Robert Lafyatis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Two distinct regions of latency-associated peptide coordinate stability of the latent transforming growth factor-beta1 complex.

Authors:  Kelly L Walton; Yogeshwar Makanji; Justin Chen; Matthew C Wilce; Karen L Chan; David M Robertson; Craig A Harrison
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Simultaneous Detection and Evaluation of Four Subsets of CD4+ T Lymphocyte in Lesions and Peripheral Blood in Endometriosis.

Authors:  Masashi Takamura; Kaori Koga; Gentaro Izumi; Tetsuya Hirata; Miyuki Harada; Yasushi Hirota; Osamu Hiraike; Tomoyuki Fujii; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Behaviour of cytokine levels in serum and peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis.

Authors:  Alfonsa Pizzo; Francesca M Salmeri; Francesca V Ardita; Vincenza Sofo; Maria Tripepi; Silvano Marsico
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.031

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Immune System in the Development of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Monika Abramiuk; Ewelina Grywalska; Paulina Małkowska; Olga Sierawska; Rafał Hrynkiewicz; Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 7.666

2.  Malignant transformation of endometriosis in a laparoscopic trocar site a case report.

Authors:  Ling Han; Bingyi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Effect of combined contraceptive pill on immune cell of ovarian endometriotic tissue.

Authors:  Wanwisa Waiyaput; Keerati Wattanakamolchai; Yada Tingthanatikul; Srithean Lertvikool; Siriluk Tantanavipas; Kanthanadon Dittharot; Morakot Sroyraya; Areepan Sophonsritsuk
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  CD4+/CD8+ mucosa-associated invariant T cells foster the development of endometriosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Caihua Li; Zhimin Lu; Kaihuan Bi; Kangxia Wang; Yuping Xu; Peipei Guo; Ya Chen; Ping Zhou; Zhaolian Wei; Huanhuan Jiang; Yunxia Cao
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 5.  Brassica Bioactives Could Ameliorate the Chronic Inflammatory Condition of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Paula García-Ibañez; Lucía Yepes-Molina; Antonio J Ruiz-Alcaraz; María Martínez-Esparza; Diego A Moreno; Micaela Carvajal; Pilar García-Peñarrubia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A History of Endometriosis Is Associated With Decreased Peripheral NK Cytotoxicity and Increased Infiltration of Uterine CD68+ Macrophages.

Authors:  Linlin Wang; Longfei Li; Yuye Li; Chunyu Huang; Ruochun Lian; Tonghua Wu; Jingwen Ma; Yan Zhang; Yanxiang Cheng; Lianghui Diao; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Myeloid cell subsets that express latency-associated peptide promote cancer growth by modulating T cells.

Authors:  Galina Gabriely; Duanduan Ma; Shafiuddin Siddiqui; Linqing Sun; Nathaniel P Skillin; Hadi Abou-El-Hassan; Thais G Moreira; Dustin Donnelly; Andre P da Cunha; Mai Fujiwara; Lena R Walton; Amee Patel; Rajesh Krishnan; Stuart S Levine; Brian C Healy; Rafael M Rezende; Gopal Murugaiyan; Howard L Weiner
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-10-27

8.  Peritoneal Modulators of Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Brunty; Lauren Clower; Brenda Mitchell; Taylor Fleshman; Nadim Bou Zgheib; Nalini Santanam
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  SCM-198 Alleviates Endometriosis by Suppressing Estrogen-ERα mediated Differentiation and Function of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells.

Authors:  Yun-Yun Li; Yi-Kong Lin; Yue Li; Xin-Hua Liu; Da-Jin Li; Xiao-Lin Wang; Li Wang; Yi-Zhun Zhu; Min Yu; Mei-Rong Du
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 10.  Role of Regulatory T Cells in Regulating Fetal-Maternal Immune Tolerance in Healthy Pregnancies and Reproductive Diseases.

Authors:  Ning Huang; Hongbin Chi; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.