Literature DB >> 16120878

Geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular nerve.

G Eggers1, M Rieker, J Fiebach, B Kress, H Dickhaus, S Hassfeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used for dental implant planning. A prerequisite for dental implant planning is the accurate imaging of risk structures like the mandibular nerve. The geometric accuracy of the imaging of the mandibular nerve was investigated.
METHODS: Two human cadaver heads were scanned using MRI. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the same heads were used as a benchmark. Using a stereotactic frame, corresponding images of MRI and CT were superimposed and the concordance of the images of the mandibular nerve in MRI with those of the mandibular canal in CT was assessed.
RESULTS: The geometric accuracy of the mandibular nerve in MRI was as good as that of the mandibular canal in CT imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI of the mandibular nerve is sufficiently accurate for the use of this imaging method in dental implant planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16120878     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/89236515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  9 in total

1.  A comparative study of Magnetic Resonance (MR) and Computed Tomography (CT) in the pre-implant evaluation.

Authors:  Valentina Pompa; Sabrina Galasso; Michele Cassetta; Giorgio Pompa; Francesca De Angelis; Stefano Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-02-13

2.  Study of inferior dental canal and its contents using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrej Krasny; Nicolai Krasny; Andreas Prescher
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Anders Ohman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences.

Authors:  Jakob Kreutner; Andreas Hopfgartner; Daniel Weber; Julian Boldt; Kurt Rottner; Ernst Richter; Peter Michael Jakob; Daniel Haddad
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Utility of fusion volumetric images from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for localizing the mandibular canal.

Authors:  Chutamas Deepho; Hiroshi Watanabe; Shinya Kotaki; Junichiro Sakamoto; Yasunori Sumi; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Mandibular canal visibility using a plain volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence in MRI.

Authors:  Chutamas Deepho; Hiroshi Watanabe; Junichiro Sakamoto; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Assessment of impacted and partially impacted lower third molars with panoramic radiography compared to MRI-a proof of principle study.

Authors:  Barbara Kirnbauer; Norbert Jakse; Petra Rugani; Michael Schwaiger; Marton Magyar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of intraoral hard and soft tissues using an intraoral coil and FLASH sequences.

Authors:  Tabea Flügge; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Ute Ludwig; Anne-Kathrin Eisenbeiss; Björn Spittau; Jürgen Hennig; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  Alexander Juerchott; Muhammad Abdullah Saleem; Tim Hilgenfeld; Christian Freudlsperger; Sebastian Zingler; Christopher J Lux; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.