Literature DB >> 29387939

Object discrepancy modulates feature prediction across eye movements.

Cassandra Philine Köller1, Christian H Poth1, Arvid Herwig2.   

Abstract

Object perception across saccadic eye movements is assumed to result from integrating two information sources: incoming peripheral object information and information from a foveal prediction (Herwig and Schneider, J Exp Psychol Gen 143(5):1903-1922, 2014, Herwig, J Vis 15(16), 7, 2015). Predictions are supposed to be based on transsaccadic associations of peripheral and foveal object information. The main function of these predictions may be to conceal discrepancies in resolution and locations across saccades. Here we ask how predictions are affected by discrepancies between peripheral and foveal objects. Participants learned unfamiliar transsaccadic associations by making saccades to objects whose shape systematically changed during the saccade. Importantly, we manipulated the size of this change between participants to induce different magnitudes of object discrepancy. In a subsequent test, we found that judgment shifts of peripheral shape perception toward the predicted foveal input depended on change size during acquisition. Specifically, the contribution of prediction decreased for large changes but did not reach zero, showing that even for large changes (i.e., square to circle or vice versa) the prediction was not ignored completely. These findings indicate that object discrepancy during learning determines how much the resulting foveal prediction contributes to perception in the periphery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29387939     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-0988-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

1.  When circles become triangular: how transsaccadic predictions shape the perception of shape.

Authors:  Arvid Herwig; Katharina Weiss; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Richard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-02

3.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.

Authors:  G W McConkie; C B Currie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Predicting object features across saccades: evidence from object recognition and visual search.

Authors:  Arvid Herwig; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-05-12

6.  Selective enhancement of orientation tuning before saccades.

Authors:  Sven Ohl; Clara Kuper; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Calibration of peripheral perception of shape with and without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Céline Paeye; Thérèse Collins; Patrick Cavanagh; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Neuronal mechanisms for visual stability: progress and problems.

Authors:  Robert H Wurtz; Wilsaan M Joiner; Rebecca A Berman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Associating peripheral and foveal visual input across saccades: a default mode of the human visual system?

Authors:  Katharina Weiß; Werner X Schneider; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of the temporal and spatial properties of trans-saccadic perceptual recalibration and saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Carlos Cassanello; Arvid Herwig; Martin Rolfs; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  A bias in saccadic suppression of shape change.

Authors:  Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Mislocalization after inhibition of saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Frauke Heins; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

Review 4.  A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Matteo Valsecchi; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Prediction of complex stimuli across saccades.

Authors:  Corinna Osterbrink; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.