Literature DB >> 24820249

Predicting object features across saccades: evidence from object recognition and visual search.

Arvid Herwig1, Werner X Schneider1.   

Abstract

When we move our eyes, we process objects in the visual field with different spatial resolution due to the nonhomogeneity of our visual system. In particular, peripheral objects are only coarsely represented, whereas they are represented with high acuity when foveated. To keep track of visual features of objects across eye movements, these changes in spatial resolution have to be taken into account. Here, we develop and test a new framework proposing a visual feature prediction mechanism based on past experience to deal with changes in spatial resolution accompanying saccadic eye movements. In 3 experiments, we first exposed participants to an altered visual stimulation where, unnoticed by participants, 1 object systematically changed visual features during saccades. Experiments 1 and 2 then demonstrate that feature prediction during peripheral object recognition is biased toward previously associated postsaccadic foveal input and that this effect is particularly associated with making saccades. Moreover, Experiment 3 shows that during visual search, feature prediction is biased toward previously associated presaccadic peripheral input. Together, these findings demonstrate that the visual system uses past experience to predict how peripheral objects will look in the fovea, and what foveal search templates should look like in the periphery. As such, they support our framework based on ideomotor theory and shed new light on the mystery of why we are most of the time unaware of acuity limitations in the periphery and of our ability to locate relevant objects in the periphery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820249     DOI: 10.1037/a0036781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  29 in total

1.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; James W Bisley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Perceptual learning while preparing saccades.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Nicholas Murray-Smith; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Suppression of frontal eye field neuronal responses with maintained fixation.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; Zeinab Bolandnazar; James W Bisley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Visuospatial Working Memory as a Fundamental Component of the Eye Movement System.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

6.  Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Saccade Preparation Reshapes Sensory Tuning.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Object discrepancy modulates feature prediction across eye movements.

Authors:  Cassandra Philine Köller; Christian H Poth; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-31

10.  Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention.

Authors:  Gözde Şentürk; Adam S Greenberg; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.