Literature DB >> 29387538

Overcoming left bundle branch block by permanent His bundle pacing: Evidence of longitudinal dissociation in the His via recordings from a permanent pacing lead.

Parikshit S Sharma1, Kristin Ellison1, Hena N Patel1, Richard G Trohman1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intra-Hisian block; Left bundle branch block; Longitudinal dissociation of HB; Permanent His bundle pacing; Split His

Year:  2017        PMID: 29387538      PMCID: PMC5778095          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2017.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep        ISSN: 2214-0271


× No keyword cloud information.
Left bundle branch block or delay can occur within fibers that are predestined to become the left bundle branch in the bundle of His. This is the concept of longitudinal dissociation within the His bundle. In such cases, permanent His bundle pacing can overcome this delay and normalize the QRS duration. It is possible in rare and well-mapped cases to demonstrate this intra-Hisian delay during His bundle pacing lead implantation.

Introduction

Narrowing of the QRS and overcoming left bundle branch block (LBBB) with His bundle pacing (HBP) has been previously described.1, 2, 3 We present the first 2 reported cases of left bundle branch (LBB) delay with evidence of a split His electrogram during unipolar mapping from the tip of the His bundle (HB) lead during pacemaker implantation. These findings suggest that the site of LBB delay is intra-Hisian, thus further validating the theory of “longitudinal dissociation in the HB.”

Case report

Case 1

The patient is a 94-year-old woman with ischemic cardiomyopathy and declining left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) despite optimal medical management. Over the past year her LVEF decreased from 35% to 20%, correlating with progression to NYHA class III heart failure. Her electrocardiogram was notable for a wide LBBB of 164 ms and she was referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). She was felt to be a reasonable candidate for CRT; however, given her advanced age and comorbidities a decision was made to consider a CRT pacemaker and not a CRT defibrillator. Owing to the patient’s frail stature without appreciable pectoral muscle, a decision was made to attempt resynchronization by placing the ventricular lead at the HB. We hoped to recruit the LBB and implant a smaller dual-chamber pacemaker generator. The HB was mapped using unipolar recordings from a Medtronic 3830 lead (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) through a His C315 sheath. HB recordings and pace mapping at different HB sites are shown in Figure 1. The final location of the HB lead resulted in nonselective HBP with recruitment of the LBBB and narrowing of the QRS to 90 ms. Total procedure time was 113 minutes and fluoroscopy time was 8.4 minutes.
Figure 1

Unipolar recordings from the lead tip at different sites the His bundle region. Top panel with unipolar recordings (filtered and unfiltered electrograms) from the His bundle pacing lead using alligator cables. As noted, mid and distal His electrograms reveal a split His electrogram. The bottom panel represents paced QRS morphologies at the respective mapped sites.

Unipolar recordings from the lead tip at different sites the His bundle region. Top panel with unipolar recordings (filtered and unfiltered electrograms) from the His bundle pacing lead using alligator cables. As noted, mid and distal His electrograms reveal a split His electrogram. The bottom panel represents paced QRS morphologies at the respective mapped sites.

Case 2

A 79-year-old man with a history of hypertension and type II diabetes was admitted with dizziness and fatigue. These episodes correlated with significant sinus bradycardia and junctional rhythm in the 30s. He was also noted to have a rate-related delay in the LBB at 60 beats per minute (bpm). A decision was made to implant a dual-chamber pacemaker for highly symptomatic sinus node dysfunction. Given the LBBB, we also planned for an HBP lead implant with an attempt to recruit the LBB delay. We started with implantation of the atrial lead so as to unmask the rate-related delay in LBB. AAI pacing at different rates showed progressive delay in the LBB (Supplemental Figure 1). The HB was mapped using unipolar recordings from a Medtronic 3830 lead (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) through a His C315 sheath. Figure 2 demonstrates HB recordings and pace mapping (5 V at 1 ms) at different HB sites. The final location of the HB lead resulted in selective HBP with recruitment of the LBBB and narrowing of the QRS to 90 ms. Total procedure time was 105 minutes and fluoroscopy time was 7 minutes.
Figure 2

Unipolar recordings and pacing from the lead tip at different sites in the His bundle (HB) region. Proximal HB electrograms demonstrate a split HB (H1-H2 of 150 ms). Right anterior oblique fluoroscopic view demonstrates location of the tip electrode. Pacing at this site demonstrates a similar QRS with left bundle branch (LBB) delay. Moving from proximal to distal HB position results in a distal site that in 0.5 ms more distal fluoroscopically, with a larger distal HB electrogram. Pacing at this site results in narrowing of the QRS and loss of LBB delay. There is no local ventricular capture, suggesting selective HB capture and LBB recruitment.

Unipolar recordings and pacing from the lead tip at different sites in the His bundle (HB) region. Proximal HB electrograms demonstrate a split HB (H1-H2 of 150 ms). Right anterior oblique fluoroscopic view demonstrates location of the tip electrode. Pacing at this site demonstrates a similar QRS with left bundle branch (LBB) delay. Moving from proximal to distal HB position results in a distal site that in 0.5 ms more distal fluoroscopically, with a larger distal HB electrogram. Pacing at this site results in narrowing of the QRS and loss of LBB delay. There is no local ventricular capture, suggesting selective HB capture and LBB recruitment.

Discussion

We present 2 patients with a wide LBBB in whom unipolar mapping from the HB pacing lead identified a split His potential. Pacing at a site distal to the split His recruited the LB. This suggests that the level of block/delay in the left bundle was likely within the HB in fibers that were predestined to the LB. In case 1, Figure 1 demonstrates proximal, mid, and distal HB recordings with corresponding paced morphologies (5 V at 1 ms). The mid and distal recordings revealed a split His potential, suggesting intra-Hisian disease as the possible site of the LBBB or left bundle delay. Pacing from the distal His site resulted in both capture of the HB and local right ventricular capture (nonselective HB capture) and successful recruitment of intra-Hisian LBBB (Figure 1). Distal HBP provided successful CRT with a narrowing of the QRS from 164 ms to 90 ms. HBP resulted in normalization of LVEF to 55% and clinical improvement to NYHA class I. Case 2 demonstrates a patient with a rate-related LBB delay who was noted to have a split HB electrogram with a wide separation (H1-H2 interval of 150 ms at 60 bpm, Figure 2) during HB mapping from the tip of the pace/sense lead. As seen in Figure 3, pacing the atrium at faster rates (from AAI 70 bpm to 100 bpm) resulted not only in A-H1 prolongation (representing normal atrioventricular nodal physiology), but also in a prolongation of H1-H2 interval from 150 ms to 180 ms. This increase in H1-H2 intervals corresponded precisely with a progressive delay in the LBBB and QRS prolongation from 140 ms to 170 ms, suggesting that the delay was within the His bundle. Pacing at the distal HB (H2) resulted in complete recruitment of LBB delay (Figure 2) and normalization of the QRS duration, confirming the intra-His site of delay.
Figure 3

AAI pacing at incremental rates with progressive intra-His and left bundle branch (LBB) delay. Similar to Figure 2, there is progressive prolongation in LBB (140 ms to 170 ms). Note the prolongation in H1-H2 intervals (from 150 ms to 180 ms) suggestive of intra-Hisian LBB delay.

AAI pacing at incremental rates with progressive intra-His and left bundle branch (LBB) delay. Similar to Figure 2, there is progressive prolongation in LBB (140 ms to 170 ms). Note the prolongation in H1-H2 intervals (from 150 ms to 180 ms) suggestive of intra-Hisian LBB delay. The normalization of bundle branch block by distal HBP was first reported in the 1970s by Narula. HB pacing has also been shown to provide pacing support for heart failure patients with and without LBBB heart failure.2, 4 The ability to recruit the left bundle with pacing at the distal HB supports the concept of functional longitudinal dissociation in the HB. Previous studies on permanent HB pacing validate this concept.3, 5, 6 The postulated mechanisms for this recruitment of branches are as follows: (1) longitudinal dissociation in the HB with pacing distal to the site of delay/block, and/or (2) differential source-sink relationships during pacing vs intrinsic impulse propagation, and/or (3) virtual electrode polarization effect. These cases support the theory of longitudinal dissociation in the HB and provide the first documentation of the ability to record a split His potential using an HB permanent pacing lead.
  5 in total

1.  Recruitment of bundle branches with permanent His bundle pacing in a patient with advanced conduction system disease: What is the mechanism?

Authors:  Parikshit S Sharma; Jose Huizar; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Alex Y Tan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Longitudinal dissociation in the His bundle. Bundle branch block due to asynchronous conduction within the His bundle in man.

Authors:  O S Narula
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.

Authors:  Daniel L Lustgarten; Eric M Crespo; Irina Arkhipova-Jenkins; Robert Lobel; Joseph Winget; Jodi Koehler; Evan Liberman; Todd Sheldon
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Ventricular resynchronization therapy by direct His-bundle pacing using an internal cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Rafael Barba-Pichardo; Ana Manovel Sánchez; Juan M Fernández-Gómez; Pablo Moriña-Vázquez; José Venegas-Gamero; Manuel Herrera-Carranza
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation.

Authors:  P Deshmukh; D A Casavant; M Romanyshyn; K Anderson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Frequent His-Purkinje discharges with longitudinal dissociation in a case with multiple premature ventricular contractions suppressed by co-treatment with verapamil and quinidine.

Authors:  Keisuke Suzuki; Satoshi Nagase; Koji Miyamoto; Takeshi Aiba; Kengo Kusano
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-03-06

2.  Permanent His Bundle Pacing: A programming and troubleshooting guide.

Authors:  Jillian L Hanifin; Venkatesh Ravi; Richard G Trohman; Parikshit S Sharma
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  His-Bundle Pacing in a Patient with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Induced Left Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Jonathan Sen; Michael Mok; Mark Perrin
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-23

4.  His Resynchronization Versus Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Ahran D Arnold; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Daniel Keene; James P Howard; S M Afzal Sohaib; Ian J Wright; Graham D Cole; Norman A Qureshi; David C Lefroy; Michael Koa-Wing; Nick W F Linton; Phang Boon Lim; Nicholas S Peters; D Wyn Davies; Amal Muthumala; Mark Tanner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The phenomenon of concealed conduction in a case of His bundle pacing (HBP).

Authors:  Shuai Sun; Hong Zhang; Xing-Peng Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Left ventricular septal pacing versus left bundle branch pacing in the treatment of atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Jinfeng Wang; Youquan Wei; Wenbo Zhang; Yuwen Yang; Shibao Rui; Changlin Ju
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 1.485

7.  Painful left bundle branch block [corrected] syndrome treated successfully with permanent His bundle pacing.

Authors:  Prakash G Suryanarayana; David S Frankel; Francis E Marchlinski; Robert D Schaller
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2018-08-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.