Literature DB >> 29384468

Emotion Regulation and Empathy: Which Relation with Social Conduct?

Fiorenzo Laghi1, Antonia Lonigro1, Susanna Pallini2, Roberto Baiocco1.   

Abstract

A shared consensus among researchers deals with the positive association between the ability to effectively regulate and manage one's emotion and the engagement in empathic behavior and morally desirable actions. This study was designed to investigate how dispositional reliance on suppression and reappraisal differently impacted on the cognitive and affective components of empathy and on social conduct, distinguishing among prosocial, internalizing, and externalizing behaviors. Two hundred nineteen middle adolescents were enrolled and fulfilled self-reports assessing emotion regulation strategies, empathy, and social behaviors. The results suggest that there are important distinctions among the emotion regulation strategies and the components of empathy as they relate to one another and to prosocial behavior and problem conduct. Specifically, cognitive reappraisal was related to prosocial behavior through empathic concern. While internalizing behavior was associated with emotion regulation strategies, externalizing behavior was only related to perspective-taking ability. Delimitations and practical implications were discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empathy concern; externalizing; internalizing; perspective taking; prosocial; reappraisal; suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29384468     DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1424705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1325            Impact factor:   1.509


  7 in total

1.  Longitudinal Relationships Between Reflective Functioning, Empathy, and Externalizing Behaviors During Adolescence and Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Larisa Morosan; Paolo Ghisletta; Deborah Badoud; Elodie Toffel; Stephan Eliez; Martin Debbané
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2020-02

2.  Less is more: Morphometric and psychological differences between low and high reappraisers.

Authors:  Edoardo Pappaianni; Nicola De Pisapia; Roma Siugzdaite; Cristiano Crescentini; Antonio Calcagnì; Remo Job; Alessandro Grecucci
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Vagal Tone Differences in Empathy Level Elicited by Different Emotions and a Co-Viewer.

Authors:  Suhhee Yoo; Mincheol Whang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling of the factor structure of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE).

Authors:  Rapson Gomez; Taylor Brown; Shaun Watson; Vasileios Stavropoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Emotion regulation and delusion-proneness relate to empathetic tendencies in a transdiagnostic sample.

Authors:  Emma N Herms; Amanda R Bolbecker; Krista M Wisner
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  The role of empathy between peers in upper secondary students' study engagement and burnout.

Authors:  Lotta Tikkanen; Henrika Anttila; Kirsi Pyhältö; Tiina Soini; Janne Pietarinen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-30

7.  Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response self-reporters showed higher scores for cognitive reappraisal as an emotion regulation strategy.

Authors:  Ricardo Morales; Daniela Ramírez-Benavides; Mario Villena-Gonzalez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.