Literature DB >> 31858436

Less is more: Morphometric and psychological differences between low and high reappraisers.

Edoardo Pappaianni1, Nicola De Pisapia2, Roma Siugzdaite3, Cristiano Crescentini4, Antonio Calcagnì2,5, Remo Job2, Alessandro Grecucci2.   

Abstract

Emotion regulation plays a crucial role in an individual's well-being, as it is known that deficits in regulating emotions can lead to psychological and psychiatric disorders. Cognitive reappraisal is widely considered to be an adaptive and effective emotion-regulation strategy. People are more or less able to apply it, but it is still not clear how reappraisal affects brain structures and the psychological profile of individuals. In our study we thus aimed to explore the impact of applying reappraisal at both the neural and the psychological level. Source-based morphometry (SBM), a whole-brain multivariate method based on the Independent Component Analysis that extracts patterns of covariation of gray matter ("independent networks"), was applied to the MRI images of 37 participants. In order to enrich their psychological profiles, we measured their experienced affectivity (PANAS) and their empathic abilities (IRI). Based on the frequency of applying reappraisal (ERQ), participants were divided into low and high reappraisers (18 vs. 19). An independent source of gray matter emerged as being different between the groups: specifically, low reappraisers showed more gray matter volume concentration in a network including the frontal, temporal, and parietal regions as compared to high reappraisers. At the psychological level, low reappraisers reported a more strongly experienced negative affect, while no difference among reappraisers emerged with regard to empathic abilities. Capitalizing on a multivariate method for structural analysis that is innovative in this field, this study extends previous observations on individual differences in the ability to regulate emotions, and it describes a plausible impact of reappraisal on brain structures and affectivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affectivity; Emotion regulation; Morphometry; Multivariate; Reappraisal

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31858436      PMCID: PMC7613187          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-019-00757-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  79 in total

1.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks.

Authors:  H L Gallagher; F Happé; N Brunswick; P C Fletcher; U Frith; C D Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

3.  Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power-Commentary on Vul et al. (2009).

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

4.  Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by Detachment, Reinterpretation, Distraction, and Expressive Suppression: a comparative fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Denise Dörfel; Jan-Peter Lamke; Falk Hummel; Ullrich Wagner; Susanne Erk; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Emotion Regulation and Empathy: Which Relation with Social Conduct?

Authors:  Fiorenzo Laghi; Antonia Lonigro; Susanna Pallini; Roberto Baiocco
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.509

6.  Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.

Authors:  J J Gross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-01

7.  Implications of emotion regulation strategies for empathic concern, social attitudes, and helping behavior.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; John F Dovidio
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-02-23

8.  Emotions at the border: Increased punishment behavior during fair interpersonal exchanges in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Chiara De Panfilis; Graziana Schito; Irene Generali; Luigi Alberto Gozzi; Paolo Ossola; Carlo Marchesi; Alessandro Grecucci
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-02

9.  Correspondence between structure and function in the human brain at rest.

Authors:  Judith M Segall; Elena A Allen; Rex E Jung; Erik B Erhardt; Sunil K Arja; Kent Kiehl; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults.

Authors:  Lisa J Burklund; J David Creswell; Michael R Irwin; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-24
View more
  7 in total

1.  Structural Features Predict Sexual Trauma and Interpersonal Problems in Borderline Personality Disorder but Not in Controls: A Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Harold Dadomo; Gerardo Salvato; Gaia Lapomarda; Zafer Ciftci; Irene Messina; Alessandro Grecucci
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Zhongyong Thinking Style and Resilience Capacity in Chinese Undergraduates: The Chain Mediating Role of Cognitive Reappraisal and Positive Affect.

Authors:  Shisi Zhou; Xueping Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Structural Features Related to Affective Instability Correctly Classify Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. A Supervised Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Alessandro Grecucci; Gaia Lapomarda; Irene Messina; Bianca Monachesi; Sara Sorella; Roma Siugzdaite
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Built to last: Theta and delta changes in resting-state EEG activity after regulating emotions.

Authors:  Gaia Lapomarda; Stefania Valer; Remo Job; Alessandro Grecucci
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Structural and functional brain networks of individual differences in trait anger and anger control: An unsupervised machine learning study.

Authors:  Sara Sorella; Valentina Vellani; Roma Siugzdaite; Paola Feraco; Alessandro Grecucci
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Italian version and associations with psychopathology.

Authors:  Irene Messina; Pietro Spataro; Alessandro Grecucci; Danielle M Moskow; Cristina Marogna; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Res Psychother       Date:  2022-08-24

7.  Emotion regulation and delusion-proneness relate to empathetic tendencies in a transdiagnostic sample.

Authors:  Emma N Herms; Amanda R Bolbecker; Krista M Wisner
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.435

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.