Literature DB >> 29383597

The attenuation value of preoperative computed tomography as a novel predictor for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Takehiko Hanaki1,2, Chihiro Uejima3, Masataka Amisaki3, Arai Yosuke3, Naruo Tokuyasu3, Soichiro Honjo3, Teruhisa Sakamoto3, Hiroaki Saito3, Masahide Ikeguchi4, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the most serious complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study was performed to identify new clinical factors that may predict the development of PF after PD to improve perioperative management.
METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients who underwent PD from 2012 to 2015 were evaluated. The patients' perioperative data including the computed tomography (CT) parameters were collected. The minimum, maximum, and mean CT attenuation values (HUmin, HUmax, and HUmean, respectively) were extracted from the pancreatic parenchyma (≥ 100 pixels), and the standard deviation of these values (HUSD) was determined from the slice in which the superior mesenteric and splenic veins were merged. PF was defined as grade B or C according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula criteria.
RESULTS: The PF occurrence rate (grade B or C) was 25.3% in 75 patients. A multivariate analysis identified a larger HUSD (odds ratio 3.092; 95% CI 1.018-9.394) and higher amylase concentration in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1 (odds ratio 1.0001; 95% CI 1.00001-1.00022) as significant risk factors for PF.
CONCLUSIONS: The HUSD of preoperative CT attenuation values in the pancreatic parenchyma was found to be an independent predictor for PF after PD and it might therefore positively contribute to the perioperative management of PD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation value; Computed tomography; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29383597     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1626-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  36 in total

1.  Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant.

Authors:  M I van Berge Henegouwen; L T De Wit; T M Van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  High attenuation pericardial fluid on CT following cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Laura L Avery; Vineet R Jain; Hillel W Cohen; Meir H Scheinfeld
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-03-18

4.  External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick Pessaux; Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Mariette; François Paye; Fabrice Muscari; Antonio Sa Cunha; Bernard Sastre; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Are there preoperative factors related to a "soft pancreas" and are they predictive of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection?

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Claudio Ricci; Giovanni Taffurelli; Marielda D'Ambra; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Carlo Ingaldi; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  R E Jimenez; C Fernandez-del Castillo; D W Rattner; Y Chang; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Recurrence pattern and prognosis of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Shunji Nagai; Tsutomu Fujii; Yasuhiro Kodera; Mitsuro Kanda; Tevfik T Sahin; Akiyuki Kanzaki; Masamichi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Shuji Nomoto; Shin Takeda; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition.

Authors:  Yujiro Kirihara; Naoki Takahashi; Yasushi Hashimoto; Guido M Sclabas; Saboor Khan; Toshiyuki Moriya; Junichi Sakagami; Marianne Huebner; Michael G Sarr; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Combined use of the automated breast volume scanner and the US elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Chaoli Xu; Shuping Wei; Yingdong Xie; Xiaoxiang Guan; Ninghua Fu; Pengfei Huang; Bin Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  The individualized selection of Pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ke-Min Jin; Wei Liu; Kun Wang; Quan Bao; Hong-Wei Wang; Bao-Cai Xing
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.