Daniel Joseph Khalaf1, Claudia M Avilés1, Arun A Azad2, Katherine Sunderland1, Tilman Todenhöfer3, Berhard J Eigl1, Daygen Finch4, Lyly Le5, Andrew Atwell6, Bruce Keith7, Christian Kollmannsberger1, Kim N Chi1,3. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia. 3. Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC, Canada. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Fraser Valley Centre, Surrey, BC, Canada. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Abbotsford Centre, Abbotsford, BC, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COU-AA-301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone. METHODS: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS. RESULTS: Patients were classified into good (0-1 RFs), intermediate (2-3 RFs), and poor (4-6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.
INTRODUCTION: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COU-AA-301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone. METHODS: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS. RESULTS:Patients were classified into good (0-1 RFs), intermediate (2-3 RFs), and poor (4-6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.
Authors: Arun A Azad; Bernhard J Eigl; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Renee Lester; Christian Kollmannsberger; Nevin Murray; Ravinder Clayton; Daniel Y C Heng; Anthony M Joshua; Kim N Chi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Susan Halabi; Chen-Yen Lin; W Kevin Kelly; Karim S Fizazi; Judd W Moul; Ellen B Kaplan; Michael J Morris; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xu S Xu; Charles J Ryan; Kim Stuyckens; Matthew R Smith; Fred Saad; Thomas W Griffin; Youn C Park; Margaret K Yu; An Vermeulen; Italo Poggesi; Partha Nandy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Changxue Lu; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Mary Nakazawa; Jeffrey C Roeser; Yan Chen; Tabrez A Mohammad; Yidong Chen; Helen L Fedor; Tamara L Lotan; Qizhi Zheng; Angelo M De Marzo; John T Isaacs; William B Isaacs; Rosa Nadal; Channing J Paller; Samuel R Denmeade; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Jun Luo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Karim Fizazi; Howard I Scher; Arturo Molina; Christopher J Logothetis; Kim N Chi; Robert J Jones; John N Staffurth; Scott North; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Fred Saad; Paul Mainwaring; Stephen Harland; Oscar B Goodman; Cora N Sternberg; Jin Hui Li; Thian Kheoh; Christopher M Haqq; Johann S de Bono Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Susan Halabi; William Kevin Kelly; Hua Ma; Haojin Zhou; Nicole C Solomon; Karim Fizazi; Catherine M Tangen; Mark Rosenthal; Daniel P Petrylak; Maha Hussain; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson; Kim N Chi; Johann de Bono; Andrew J Armstrong; Mario A Eisenberger; Abderrahim Fandi; Shaoyi Li; John C Araujo; Christopher J Logothetis; David I Quinn; Michael J Morris; Celestia S Higano; Ian F Tannock; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K N Chi; T Kheoh; C J Ryan; A Molina; J Bellmunt; N J Vogelzang; D E Rathkopf; K Fizazi; P W Kantoff; J Li; A A Azad; B J Eigl; D Y C Heng; A M Joshua; J S de Bono; H I Scher Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Fan Li; Hui Xiang; Zisen Pang; Zejia Chen; Jinlong Dai; Shu Chen; Bin Xu; Tianyu Zhang Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Emmy Boerrigter; Guillemette E Benoist; Inge M van Oort; Gerald W Verhaegh; Anton F J de Haan; Onno van Hooij; Levi Groen; Frank Smit; Irma M Oving; Pieter de Mol; Tineke J Smilde; Diederik M Somford; Paul Hamberg; Vincent O Dezentjé; Niven Mehra; Nielka P van Erp; Jack A Schalken Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 6.639