Literature DB >> 24508071

Outcomes with abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who have poor performance status.

Arun A Azad1, Bernhard J Eigl1, Raya Leibowitz-Amit2, Renee Lester3, Christian Kollmannsberger1, Nevin Murray1, Ravinder Clayton3, Daniel Y C Heng3, Anthony M Joshua2, Kim N Chi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) has proven efficacy in two randomised phase 3 trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2 were either excluded or under-represented in these trials.
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in ECOG PS 0-1 and ≥2 in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cancer registries from three Canadian centres were used to retrospectively identify mCRPC patients (postdocetaxel and docetaxel-naïve) treated with abiraterone. ECOG PS, clinicopathologic characteristics, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and survival data were collected. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to examine the effect of clinicopathologic characteristics on overall survival (OS) and time to PSA progression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 519 patients were identified; 61% (n=318) and 39% (n=201) were ECOG PS 0-1 and ≥2, respectively. ECOG PS 0-1 patients were significantly more likely than PS ≥2 patients to achieve a PSA decline ≥50% from baseline (45% vs 32%; p=0.003, Fisher exact test) and had significantly longer median time to PSA progression (5.2 mo vs 4.1 mo; p=0.023), median treatment duration (7.4 mo vs 4.5 mo; p<0.001), and median OS (20.0 mo vs 9.1 mo; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS was a significant factor for OS (p<0.001), time to PSA progression (p=0.043), and PSA decline (p=0.002). Potential limitations include the retrospective study design and subjective nature of ECOG PS classification.
CONCLUSIONS: ECOG PS ≥2 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone have inferior outcomes compared with ECOG 0-1 patients, especially in regard to OS. These data indicate that early initiation of abiraterone prior to a decline in PS may be warranted. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We found that advanced prostate cancer patients who have worse performance status (PS) derive less benefit from abiraterone, indicating that earlier treatment before PS declines could improve outcomes. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abiraterone acetate; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; ECOG; Performance status; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24508071     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  Effectiveness, safety and cost of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world data analysis.

Authors:  M Koninckx; J L Marco; I Pérez; M T Faus; V Alcolea; F Gómez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Abiraterone Acetate: A Review in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostrate Cancer.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The diverse chemistry of cytochrome P450 17A1 (P450c17, CYP17A1).

Authors:  Francis K Yoshimoto; Richard J Auchus
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.292

4.  A population-based study of the use of radium 223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Factors associated with treatment completion.

Authors:  Sunil Parimi; Erica Tsang; Abraham Alexander; Michael Mckenzie; Francois Bachand; Katherine Sunderland; Kim N Chi; Maria Aparicio; Daniel Worsley; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate.

Authors:  Daniel Joseph Khalaf; Claudia M Avilés; Arun A Azad; Katherine Sunderland; Tilman Todenhöfer; Berhard J Eigl; Daygen Finch; Lyly Le; Andrew Atwell; Bruce Keith; Christian Kollmannsberger; Kim N Chi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of abiraterone before and after docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Raji Shameem; Muhammad Saad Hamid; Kevin Y Xu; Shenhong Wu
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-10

7.  Clinical effect of abiraterone acetate in Korean patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer according to duration of androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Ki Bom Kim; Jung Ki Jo; Soyeon Ahn; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-08-06

8.  PD-L1 is highly expressed in Enzalutamide resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bishop; Alexander Sio; Arkhjamil Angeles; Morgan E Roberts; Arun A Azad; Kim N Chi; Amina Zoubeidi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 9.  Impact of abiraterone on patient-related outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Joelle El-Amm; Rami Nassabein; Jeanny B Aragon-Ching
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Performance Status Work Group.

Authors:  Allison Magnuson; Suanna S Bruinooge; Harpreet Singh; Keith D Wilner; Shadia Jalal; Stuart M Lichtman; Paul G Kluetz; Gary H Lyman; Heidi D Klepin; Mark E Fleury; Brad Hirsch; Allen Melemed; Fernanda I Arnaldez; Upal Basu Roy; Caroline Schenkel; Shimere Sherwood; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 13.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.