| Literature DB >> 24685433 |
Praful Ravi1, Joaquin Mateo1, David Lorente1, Zafeiris Zafeiriou1, Amelia Altavilla1, Roberta Ferraldeschi1, Spyridon Sideris1, Emily Grist1, Alan Smith1, Sophia Wong1, Diletta Bianchini1, Gerhardt Attard1, Johann S de Bono2.
Abstract
A prognostic model was derived from the population of the COU-AA-301 phase 3 trial for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone after docetaxel, and it stratifies patients into three risk groups based on clinical parameters. We validated this model in an independent cohort of patients treated with abiraterone after docetaxel outside a clinical trial (group A; n=94) and explored its utility in patients treated with abiraterone in the prechemotherapy setting (group B; n=64). For group A, median overall survival (mOS) was significantly different across the three prognostic groups (good: n=39, mOS: 21.8 mo; intermediate: n=44, mOS: 10.6 mo; poor: n=7, mOS: 6.8 mo; p<0.001; area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71). Analysis of group B confirmed the ability of the model to prognosticate for survival in the prechemotherapy setting: (good: n=44, mOS: 45.6 mo; intermediate or poor: n=20, mOS: 34.5 mo; p=0.042; AUC: 0.61). These results serve to validate the prognostic model in an independent population treated with abiraterone after docetaxel and support clinical implementation of the score. Calibration of the model was poorer in patients receiving abiraterone prechemotherapy. Prospective evaluation of this model in clinical trials is needed.Entities:
Keywords: Abiraterone; Castrate-resistant prostate cancer; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24685433 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Urol ISSN: 0302-2838 Impact factor: 20.096