| Literature DB >> 29375599 |
Yujun Zhao1, Yifeng Zhang2, Ping Su1, Jian Yang1, Luqi Huang1, Wei Gao2.
Abstract
Tripterygium wilfordii is a perennial woody liana medicinal plant with several crucial biological activities. Although studies on tissue culture have previously been conducted, research on genetic transformation is much more challenging and therefore results in slower progress. In the present study, a highly efficient transformation system involving the particle bombardment of T. wilfordii with the reporter egfp gene using the PDS-1000/He system was established. A total of seven parameters affecting the genetic transformation were investigated using an L18 (6 × 36)-type orthogonal array. The result indicated that DNA delivery conditions of 3-cm target distance, 1100 psi helium pressure, 28 mmHg chamber vacuum pressure, three times number of bombardment, CaCl2 as precipitation agent, 2 μg plasmid DNA concentration and 48 h post-bombardment incubation time were optimal for T. wilfordii cell suspensions transformation. The average transformation efficiency was 19.17%. Based on this transformation system, the overexpression of two T. wilfordii farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase genes (TwFPSs) was performed in cell suspensions. Integration of the TwFPSs in the genome was verified by PCR analysis and also by Southern blotting using hygromycin gene as a probe. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis showed that the expression of TwFPS1&2 was highly up regulated in transgenic cell suspensions compared with control cells. The detection of metabolites showed that TwFPS1&2 could highly increase the celastrol content (973.60 μg/g) in transgenic cells. These results indicated that this transformation system is an effective protocol for characterizing the function of genes in the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway.Entities:
Keywords: Tripterygium wilfordii; celastrol; genetic transformation; particle bombardment; suspension cell
Year: 2018 PMID: 29375599 PMCID: PMC5767223 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
| Fresh PCR product | 0.5 |
| Salt Solution | 2 |
| TOPO vector | 0.5 |
| Final volume | 3 |
| Entry clone (100–300ng) | 0.4 |
| Destination vector (150ng) | 1 |
| 5 × LR Clonase reaction buffer | 1 |
| TE Buffer, pH 8.0 | 0.6 |
| Final volume | 3 |
Control factors and levels of variables used in this study.
| Symbol | Control factor | Levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| A | Target tissue distance (cm) | 3 | 6 | 9 | - | - | - |
| B | Helium pressure (psi) | 900 | 1100 | 1350 | - | - | - |
| C | Chamber vacuum pressure (mmHg) | 26 | 27 | 28 | - | - | - |
| D | Number of bombardments | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
| E | Precipitation agents | Ca | Sb | CSc | - | - | - |
| F | Plasmid DNA (μg) | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | – | – | – |
| G | Time (hours) | 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 120 | 144 |
The orthogonal array with mixed levels of L18 (6 × 36) (numbers 1–6 show the different levels of the each factors as assigned in Table ).
| Run | Control factors | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (hours) | Target tissue distance (cm) | Helium pressure (psi) | Number of bombardments | Precipitation agents | Plasmid DNA (μg) | Chamber vacuum pressure (mmHg) | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 12 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 13 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 15 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 16 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 17 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 18 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Range analysis result of test L18 (6 × 36).
| Factor | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | Level 6 | R’ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target tissue distance (cm) | 116.58 | 91.92 | 67.58 | - | - | - | 44.13 |
| Helium pressure (psi) | 77.17 | 108.17 | 90.75 | - | - | - | 27.92 |
| Chamber vacuum pressure (mmHg) | 60.58 | 98.75 | 116.75 | - | - | - | 50.59 |
| Number of bombardments | 85.00 | 75.50 | 115.58 | - | - | - | 36.10 |
| Precipitation agents | 114.17 | 58.75 | 103.17 | - | - | - | 49.91 |
| Plasmid DNA (μg) | 70.33 | 71.33 | 134.42 | - | - | - | 57.72 |
| Time (hours) | 103.50 | 162.67 | 86.50 | 23.67 | 47.17 | 128.67 | 125.98 |
Variance analysis for the effect of control factors on the egfp.
| Source | SSa | DFb | MSc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target tissue distance (cm) | 6695.06 | 2 | 3347.53 | 1.19 | 0.328 |
| Helium pressure (psi) | 3266.89 | 2 | 1633.44 | 0.58 | 0.570 |
| Chamber vacuum pressure (mmHg) | 7419.39 | 2 | 3709.69 | 1.32 | 0.293 |
| Number of bombardments | 28924.39 | 2 | 14462.19 | 5.13 | 0.017* |
| Precipitation agents | 6767.06 | 2 | 3383.53 | 1.20 | 0.324 |
| Plasmid DNA (μg) | 20213.56 | 2 | 10106.78 | 3.59 | 0.049* |
| Time (hours) | 84467.56 | 5 | 16893.51 | 5.99 | 0.002** |
| Error | 50729.00 | 18 | 2818.28 | ||
| Total | 208482.89 | 35 | |||