Literature DB >> 29375168

Effects of concurrent task demands on language planning in fluent children and adults.

Jayanthi Sasisekaran1, Cara Donohue1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate how children and adults allocate cognitive resources to performing segmental encoding and monitoring in a dual task paradigm and the response patterns of the primary and secondary tasks in the dual task.
METHODS: Participants were 20 children divided equally into two age groups-7 to 11 years, 12 to 15 years, and 10 adults. The primary task required participants to monitor phonemic segments in a picture - written word interference paradigm while silently naming the pictures. The picture and distractor word were the same (replica), related (phoneme onset overlap), or unrelated. The secondary task required participants to make pitch judgments on tones presented at short (330 ms) or long (1130 ms) stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) from picture onset.
RESULTS: Developmental differences were observed in both response times and percent errors in the primary and secondary tasks. Slower responses to the primary task were evident at the long SOA, related condition. Slower response times to the tone decision task were evident at the short than the long SOA. The findings support the capacity sharing account of dual task performance and suggest that dual task costs during language planning are higher in children than adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age effects; cognitive resources; dual task performance; phonemic encoding and monitoring

Year:  2015        PMID: 29375168      PMCID: PMC5786384          DOI: 10.1017/s0142716415000582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist        ISSN: 0142-7164


  18 in total

1.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; R W Remington; M Van Selst
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Developmental changes in children's abilities to share and allocate attention in a dual task.

Authors:  H Irwin-Chase; B Burns
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Phonological activation of category coordinates during speech planning is observable in children but not in adults: evidence for cascaded processing.

Authors:  Jörg D Jescheniak; Anja Hahne; Stefanie Hoffmann; Valentin Wagner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments.

Authors:  Amy E Cook; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Age differences between children and young adults in the dynamics of dual-task prioritization: body (balance) versus mind (memory).

Authors:  Sabine Schaefer; Ralf Th Krampe; Ulman Lindenberger; Paul B Baltes
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-05

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Disfluency rates in conversation: effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender.

Authors:  H Bortfeld; S D Leon; J E Bloom; M F Schober; S E Brennan
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Cross-sectional study of phoneme and rhyme monitoring abilities in children between 7 and 13 years.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2011-06-08

10.  Attentional modulation of word recognition by children in a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Sangsook Choi; Andrew Lotto; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Influence of Executive Functions on Phonemic Processing in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Shriya Basu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.