Literature DB >> 29374381

Phonological and graphotactic influences on spellers' decisions about consonant doubling.

Rebecca Treiman1, Sloane Wolter2.   

Abstract

Even adults sometimes have difficulty choosing between single- and double-letter spellings, as in spinet versus spinnet. The present study examined the phonological and graphotactic factors that influence adults' use of single versus double medial consonants in the spelling of nonwords. We tested 111 adults from a community sample who varied widely in spelling ability. Better spellers were more affected than less good spellers by phonological context in that they were more likely to double consonants after short vowels and less likely to double consonants after long vowels. Although descriptions of the English writing system focus on the role of phonology in determining use of single versus double consonants, participants were also influenced by graphotactic context. There was an effect of preceding graphotactic context, such that spellers were less likely to use a double consonant when they spelled the preceding vowel with more than one letter than when they spelled it with one letter. There was also an effect of following graphotactic context, such that doubling rate varied with the letters that the participant used at the end of the nonword. These graphotactic influences did not differ significantly in strength across the range of spelling ability in our study. Discussion focuses on the role of statistical learning in the learning of spelling patterns, especially those patterns that are not explicitly taught.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double letters; Graphotactics; Phonology; Spelling; Spelling models; Statistical learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29374381     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0793-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Beyond the two-strategy model of skilled spelling: effects of consistency, grain size, and orthographic redundancy.

Authors:  Conrad Perry; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-02

2.  When cues collide: children's sensitivity to letter- and meaning-patterns in spelling words in English.

Authors:  S H Deacon; D Leblanc; C Sabourin
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2010-10-18

3.  Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture.

Authors:  George Houghton; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Doublet challenge: form comes before function in children's understanding of their orthography.

Authors:  Annukka Lehtonen; Peter Bryant
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-05

5.  The automaticity of visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Justin Jungé; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

6.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

8.  Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.

Authors:  J R Saffran; R N Aslin; E L Newport
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Choosing between alternative spellings of sounds: The role of context.

Authors:  Rebecca Treiman; Brett Kessler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The influence of graphotactic knowledge on adults' learning of spelling.

Authors:  Amélie Sobaco; Rebecca Treiman; Ronald Peereman; Gaëlle Borchardt; Sébastien Pacton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.