Literature DB >> 16316291

The automaticity of visual statistical learning.

Nicholas B Turk-Browne1, Justin Jungé, Brian J Scholl.   

Abstract

The visual environment contains massive amounts of information involving the relations between objects in space and time, and recent studies of visual statistical learning (VSL) have suggested that this information can be automatically extracted by the visual system. The experiments reported in this article explore the automaticity of VSL in several ways, using both explicit familiarity and implicit response-time measures. The results demonstrate that (a) the input to VSL is gated by selective attention, (b) VSL is nevertheless an implicit process because it operates during a cover task and without awareness of the underlying statistical patterns, and (c) VSL constructs abstracted representations that are then invariant to changes in extraneous surface features. These results fuel the conclusion that VSL both is and is not automatic: It requires attention to select the relevant population of stimuli, but the resulting learning then occurs without intent or awareness. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16316291     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  184 in total

Review 1.  Visual prediction and perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Age differences in visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Shira Zimerman; M Karl Healey; Michelle M S Lee; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-16

3.  Rapid learning of rapid temporal contexts.

Authors:  Carly R Mayberry; Evan J Livesey; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

4.  Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Brian J Scholl; Marcia K Johnson; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Prediction suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex depends on the conditional probability between images.

Authors:  Suchitra Ramachandran; Travis Meyer; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Updating representations of temporal intervals.

Authors:  James Danckert; Britt Anderson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Enhanced visual statistical learning in adults with autism.

Authors:  Matthew E Roser; Richard N Aslin; Rebecca McKenzie; Daniel Zahra; József Fiser
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Reward impacts visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Su Hyoun Park; Leeland L Rogers; Matthew R Johnson; Timothy J Vickery
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Anchors aweigh: The impact of overlearning on entrenchment effects in statistical learning.

Authors:  Federica Bulgarelli; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.