Literature DB >> 29372137

Demographic Trends in the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Scoliosis Surgery in the United States.

Remi M Ajiboye1, Howard Y Park1, Jeremiah R Cohen1, Evan E Vellios1, Elizabeth L Lord1, Adedayo O Ashana1, Zorica Buser2, Jeffrey C Wang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) such as motor-evoked potential (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and electromyography (EMG) are used to detect impending neurological injuries during spinal surgery. To date, little is known on the trends in the use of ION for scoliosis surgery in the United States.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Database to identify patients that had scoliosis surgery with and without ION from years 2005 to 2011. Demographic information (such as age, gender, region within the United States) and clinical information (such as type of ION and rates of neurological injury) were assessed.
RESULTS: There were 3618 patients who had scoliosis surgery during the study period. ION was used in 1361 (37.6%) of these cases. The number of cases in which ION was used increased from 27% in 2005 to 46.9% in 2011 (p < 0.0001). Multimodal ION was used more commonly than unimodal ION (64.6% vs. 35.4%). The most commonly used modality was combined SSEP and EMG while the least used modality was MEP only. Neurological injuries occurred in 1.8% and 2.0% of patients that had surgery with and without ION, respectively (p = 0.561). ION was used most commonly in patients < 65 years of age and in the Northeastern part of the United States (age; p = 0.006, region; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of ION for scoliosis surgery gradually increased annually from 2005 to 2011. Age and regional differences were noted with neuromonitoring being most commonly used for scoliosis surgery in non-elderly patients and in the Northeastern part of the United States. No differences were noted in the risk of neurological injury in patients that had surgery with and without ION. Although the findings from this study may seem to suggest that ION may not influence the risk of neurologic injury, this result must be interpreted with caution as inherently riskier surgeries may utilize ION more, leading to an actual reduction in injuries more dramatic than observed in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electromyography; motor-evoked potential; neuromonitoring; scoliosis; somatosensory evoked potential

Year:  2017        PMID: 29372137      PMCID: PMC5779268          DOI: 10.14444/4033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  22 in total

1.  A socioeconomic analysis of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: national use, regional variation, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Whitney Sheen James; Anand I Rughani; Travis M Dumont
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials*.

Authors:  Marc R Nuwer; Ronald G Emerson; Gloria Galloway; Alan D Legatt; Jaime Lopez; Robert Minahan; Thoru Yamada; Douglas S Goodin; Carmel Armon; Vinay Chaudhry; Gary S Gronseth; Cynthia L Harden
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 3.  Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery.

Authors:  Neil R Malhotra; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Daniel K Resnick; Tanvir F Choudhri; Andrew T Dailey; Michael W Groff; Larry Khoo; Paul G Matz; Praveen Mummaneni; William C Watters; Jeffrey Wang; Beverly C Walters; Mark N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-06

5.  Neural complications in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mohammad Diab; Amanda R Smith; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases.

Authors:  H J Forbes; P W Allen; C S Waller; S J Jones; M A Edgar; P J Webb; A O Ransford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-05

7.  Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine.

Authors:  C L Nash; R A Lorig; L A Schatzinger; R H Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during 409 lumbosacral surgical procedures in 409 patients.

Authors:  Martin A Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Dezsö Jeszenszky; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery.

Authors:  Luciana Pelosi; J Lamb; M Grevitt; S M H Mehdian; J K Webb; L D Blumhardt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery of spinal deformities in 217 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Eggspuehler; Martin A Sutter; Dieter Grob; Dezsö Jeszenszky; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.