Literature DB >> 29368366

In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.

A Jain1, J R Baker1, J W Chen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal pressure topography (EPT) diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) can be non-specific with unclear clinical significance. AIMS: To determine whether peristaltic vigor or lower esophageal sphincter (LES) integrity is associated with poor clearance and acid reflux in IEM.
METHODS: Bolus clearance on high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) and available reflux studies in patients with IEM were retrospectively reviewed. Bolus clearance was assessed using both line tracing and colored contour methods on HRIM. EPT parameters, bolus clearance, and acid reflux variables were explored. KEY
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients with IEM were included. Bolus clearance occurred in 71% of all swallows, and 55.7% of patients had complete bolus transit (CBT, bolus clearance in ≥80% of swallows). Bolus clearance was impaired in swallows with distal contractile integral (DCI) <100 mmHg•cm•s compared to DCI 100-450 (0.43 vs 0.79, P < .0001). A cutoff at DCI 100 mmHg•cm•s was associated with clearance with an accuracy of 76% compared to 49% at DCI 450 (P = .0001 for both). A median DCI <100 was associated with a higher Eckardt score (9 vs 3, P = .03), and on reflux testing available in 47 patients, with abnormal acid exposure time (P = .002). Peristaltic reserve (PR) defined as (DCI of multiple rapid swallow/median DCI of wet swallows), integrated relaxation pressure, and resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure were not associated with clearance or acid exposure. CONCLUSIONS &amp; INFERENCES: Failed peristalsis, as defined by DCI <100 mmHg•cm•s, is associated with impaired bolus clearance and more severe dysphagia in IEM, and likely abnormal acid exposure.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GERD; esophagus; impedance; manometry; motility

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368366     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

2.  High-Resolution Manometry Diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated with Higher Reflux Burden.

Authors:  Chanakyaram A Reddy; Jason R Baker; Joyee Lau; Joan W Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Minor esophageal functional disorders: are they relevant?

Authors:  Ryan A Balko; Don C Codipilly; Karthik Ravi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 4.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Hard to Swallow Results.

Authors:  S Saboori; M Jarvis; J Baker; B Seminara; D Vickers; T Pacicco; B Moshiree
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 6.  Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.960

7.  High Resolution Impedance Manometry: A Necessity or Luxury in Esophageal Motility Disorder?

Authors:  Han Sin Boo; Ian Chik; Chai Soon Ngiu; Shyang Yee Lim; Razman Jarmin
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-08-23

8.  High prevalence of esophagitis in patients with severe ineffective esophageal motility: need for a new diagnostic cutoff.

Authors:  Hang Viet Dao; Long Bao Hoang; Minh-Hue Thi Luu; Hoa Lan Nguyen; Robert Goldberg; Jeroan Allison; Minh-An Thi Dao; Tomoaki Matsumura; Long Van Dao
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.