Literature DB >> 29365066

Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study.

Christopher D Whelan1,2, Andre Altmann3, Juan A Botía4, Neda Jahanshad1, Derrek P Hibar1, Julie Absil5, Saud Alhusaini2,6, Marina K M Alvim7, Pia Auvinen8,9, Emanuele Bartolini10,11, Felipe P G Bergo7, Tauana Bernardes7, Karen Blackmon12,13, Barbara Braga7, Maria Eugenia Caligiuri14, Anna Calvo15, Sarah J Carr16, Jian Chen17, Shuai Chen18,19, Andrea Cherubini14, Philippe David5, Martin Domin20, Sonya Foley21, Wendy França7, Gerrit Haaker22,23, Dmitry Isaev1, Simon S Keller24, Raviteja Kotikalapudi25,26, Magdalena A Kowalczyk27, Ruben Kuzniecky12, Soenke Langner20, Matteo Lenge10, Kelly M Leyden28,29, Min Liu30, Richard Q Loi28,29, Pascal Martin25, Mario Mascalchi31,32, Marcia E Morita7, Jose C Pariente15, Raul Rodríguez-Cruces33, Christian Rummel34, Taavi Saavalainen9,35, Mira K Semmelroch27, Mariasavina Severino36, Rhys H Thomas37,38, Manuela Tondelli39, Domenico Tortora36, Anna Elisabetta Vaudano39, Lucy Vivash40,41, Felix von Podewils42, Jan Wagner43,44, Bernd Weber43,45, Yi Yao46, Clarissa L Yasuda7, Guohao Zhang47, Nuria Bargalló15,48, Benjamin Bender26, Neda Bernasconi30, Andrea Bernasconi30, Boris C Bernhardt30,49, Ingmar Blümcke23, Chad Carlson12,50, Gianpiero L Cavalleri2,51, Fernando Cendes7, Luis Concha33, Norman Delanty2,51,52, Chantal Depondt53, Orrin Devinsky12, Colin P Doherty51,54, Niels K Focke25,55, Antonio Gambardella14,56, Renzo Guerrini10,11, Khalid Hamandi37,38, Graeme D Jackson27,57, Reetta Kälviäinen8,9, Peter Kochunov58, Patrick Kwan41, Angelo Labate14,56, Carrie R McDonald28,29, Stefano Meletti39, Terence J O'Brien41,59, Sebastien Ourselin3, Mark P Richardson16,60, Pasquale Striano61, Thomas Thesen12,13, Roland Wiest34, Junsong Zhang18,19, Annamaria Vezzani62, Mina Ryten4,63, Paul M Thompson1, Sanjay M Sisodiya64,65.   

Abstract

Progressive functional decline in the epilepsies is largely unexplained. We formed the ENIGMA-Epilepsy consortium to understand factors that influence brain measures in epilepsy, pooling data from 24 research centres in 14 countries across Europe, North and South America, Asia, and Australia. Structural brain measures were extracted from MRI brain scans across 2149 individuals with epilepsy, divided into four epilepsy subgroups including idiopathic generalized epilepsies (n =367), mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE; left, n = 415; right, n = 339), and all other epilepsies in aggregate (n = 1026), and compared to 1727 matched healthy controls. We ranked brain structures in order of greatest differences between patients and controls, by meta-analysing effect sizes across 16 subcortical and 68 cortical brain regions. We also tested effects of duration of disease, age at onset, and age-by-diagnosis interactions on structural measures. We observed widespread patterns of altered subcortical volume and reduced cortical grey matter thickness. Compared to controls, all epilepsy groups showed lower volume in the right thalamus (Cohen's d = -0.24 to -0.73; P < 1.49 × 10-4), and lower thickness in the precentral gyri bilaterally (d = -0.34 to -0.52; P < 4.31 × 10-6). Both MTLE subgroups showed profound volume reduction in the ipsilateral hippocampus (d = -1.73 to -1.91, P < 1.4 × 10-19), and lower thickness in extrahippocampal cortical regions, including the precentral and paracentral gyri, compared to controls (d = -0.36 to -0.52; P < 1.49 × 10-4). Thickness differences of the ipsilateral temporopolar, parahippocampal, entorhinal, and fusiform gyri, contralateral pars triangularis, and bilateral precuneus, superior frontal and caudal middle frontal gyri were observed in left, but not right, MTLE (d = -0.29 to -0.54; P < 1.49 × 10-4). Contrastingly, thickness differences of the ipsilateral pars opercularis, and contralateral transverse temporal gyrus, were observed in right, but not left, MTLE (d = -0.27 to -0.51; P < 1.49 × 10-4). Lower subcortical volume and cortical thickness associated with a longer duration of epilepsy in the all-epilepsies, all-other-epilepsies, and right MTLE groups (beta, b < -0.0018; P < 1.49 × 10-4). In the largest neuroimaging study of epilepsy to date, we provide information on the common epilepsies that could not be realistically acquired in any other way. Our study provides a robust ranking of brain measures that can be further targeted for study in genetic and neuropathological studies. This worldwide initiative identifies patterns of shared grey matter reduction across epilepsy syndromes, and distinctive abnormalities between epilepsy syndromes, which inform our understanding of epilepsy as a network disorder, and indicate that certain epilepsy syndromes involve more widespread structural compromise than previously assumed.
© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; epilepsy; precentral gyrus; thalamus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29365066      PMCID: PMC5837616          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


Introduction

Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder, comprising many different syndromes and conditions, affecting 0.6–1.5% of the population worldwide (Bell ). Approximately one-third of affected individuals do not respond to antiepileptic drug therapy (French, 2007). Alternative treatment options may not be appropriate (Englot ), and are not always effective (Téllez-Zenteno ; Englot ). The identification of shared biological disease pathways may help elucidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets, which, in turn, could help to optimize individual treatment (Pitkänen ). However, disease biology remains unexplained for most cases—especially in commonly occurring epilepsies. Epilepsy is a network disorder typically involving widespread structural alterations beyond the putative epileptic focus (Bernhardt ; Vaughan ). Hippocampal sclerosis is a common pathological substrate of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), but extrahippocampal abnormalities are also frequently observed in MTLE, notably in the thalamus (Keller and Roberts, 2008; Coan ; Alvim ) and neocortex (Keller and Roberts, 2008; Bernhardt , 2010; Blanc ; Labate ; Vaughan ). Neocortical abnormalities are also reported in idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) (Bernhardt ), and many childhood syndromes (O’Muircheartaigh ; Vollmar ; Ronan ; Overvliet ). Thus, common epilepsies may be characterized by shared disturbances in distributed cortico-subcortical brain networks (Berg ), but the pattern, consistency and cause of these disturbances, and how they relate to functional decline (Vlooswijk ; Bernasconi, 2016; Nickels ), are largely unknown. Currently, we lack reliable data from large cross-sectional neuroimaging, brain tissue, or biomarker studies in the common epilepsies. Brain tissue is not available from large cohorts of patients: common forms of epilepsy are often unsuitable for surgical treatment, so biopsied tissues are simply unavailable in sufficient numbers for research into disease biology. Brain-wide post-mortem studies also require extensive effort for comprehensive analysis. MRI offers detailed information on brain structure, but MRI measures from groups of individuals with and without epilepsy are not always consistent. For example, MTLE is associated with hippocampal sclerosis in up to 70% of brain MRI scans (Blümcke ). However, the effects of laterality, and the extent of extrahippocampal grey matter loss are inconsistently reported in studies of left versus right MTLE (Kemmotsu ; Liu ). Similarly, abnormalities of the basal ganglia, hippocampus, lateral ventricles, and neocortex have all been reported in IGE (Betting ), but most alterations are non-specific, and visual inspection of clinical MRI in IGE is typically normal (Woermann ). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic variants associated with complex epilepsies by ‘lumping’ different epilepsy types together (International League Against Epilepsy Consortium on Complex Epilepsies, 2014), but MRI studies are typically of smaller scale, and have not widely explored whether distinct epilepsy syndromes share common structural abnormalities. There are many sources of inconsistency in previously reported MRI findings. First, epileptic seizures and syndromes are diverse; classifications are often revised and contested (Berg ; Scheffer ). Second, most cross-sectional brain imaging studies are based on small samples (typically <50 cases), limiting the power to detect subtle group differences (Button ). Third, variability in scanning protocols, image processing, and statistical analysis may affect the sensitivity of brain measures across studies. The Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium was formed to address these issues (Bearden and Thompson, 2017). ENIGMA is a global initiative, combining large samples with coordinated image processing, and integrating genomic and MRI data across hundreds of research centres worldwide. Prior ENIGMA studies have identified genetic variants associated with variations in brain structure (Stein ; Hibar , 2017; Adams ), and have reliably characterized patterns of brain abnormalities in schizophrenia (van Erp ), major depression (Schmaal , obsessive compulsive disorder (Boedhoe , attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Hoogman , and many other brain illnesses (Thompson ). Large-scale, collaborative initiatives such as ENIGMA may improve our understanding of epilepsy, helping clinicians make more informed decisions and provide personalized treatment strategies (Ben-Menachem, 2016). Thus, we formed the Epilepsy Working Group of ENIGMA (‘ENIGMA-Epilepsy’) to apply coordinated, well-powered studies of imaging and genetic data in epilepsy. Here, in the largest analysis of structural brain abnormalities in epilepsy to date, we ranked effect sizes for 16 subcortical and 68 cortical brain regions in 2149 individuals with epilepsy and 1727 healthy controls, using harmonized image processing, quality control, and meta-analysis. First, we grouped all epilepsies together, to determine whether biologically distinct syndromes show robust, common structural deficits. Second, we assessed a well-characterized form of epilepsy: MTLE with hippocampal sclerosis, analysing patients with left- and right-sided hippocampal sclerosis as independent groups. Third, we examined another major set of epilepsy syndromes: IGE. Finally, we studied all remaining epilepsies as a combined subgroup, to understand the relative contributions of IGE, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, and all other syndromes on shared patterns of structural compromise. We tested how age at scan, age of onset, and epilepsy duration affected brain structural measures. Based on existing neuroimaging (Gotman ; Bernhardt ; Liu ), neurophysiological (Gotman ), neuropathological (Thom ), and genetic data (International League Against Epilepsy Consortium on Complex Epilepsies, 2014), we predicted that (i) biologically distinct epilepsy syndromes would exhibit shared patterns of structural abnormalities; (ii) MTLEs with left or right hippocampal sclerosis would show distinct patterns of hippocampal and extrahippocampal structural deficits; and (iii) IGEs would also display subcortical volume and cortical thickness differences, compared to healthy controls.

Materials and methods

Each centre received approval from their local institutional review board or ethics committee. Written informed consent was provided according to local requirements (Supplementary Table 1).

Experimental design

Participants

Twenty-four cross-sectional samples from 14 countries were included in the study, totalling 2149 people with epilepsy and 1727 research centre-matched healthy control subjects (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The locations, dates, and periods of participant recruitment are provided in Supplementary Table 1. An epilepsy specialist assessed seizure and syndrome classifications at each centre, using International League Against Epilepsy terminology (Berg ). Participants were aged 18–55.
Figure 1

Study flowchart. ILAE = International League Against Epilepsy; MOU = memorandum of understanding.

Table 1

ENIGMA - Epilepsy Working Group demographics, including age (in years), mean age at onset of epilepsy (in years), mean duration of illness (in years), sex, and case-control breakdown for participating sites

Site nameAge controls (Mean ± SD)Age cases (Mean ± SD)Age of onset (Mean ± SD)Duration of illness (Mean ± years)Female controlsFemale casesTotal controlsTotal casesMTLE-L casesMTLE-R casesIGE cases‘Other’ casesTotal n
Bern32.5 ± 9.3930.48 ± 10.13--412878561081226134
Bonn40.11 ± 13.439.68 ± 13.416.86 ± 11.9622.82 ± 14.18406077108713700185
BRI34.73 ± 10.6133.28 ± 10.5917.9 ± 11.4917.9 ± 12.9349461127910131838191
Brussels26.64 ± 4.3433.79 ± 9.914.46 ± 10.1319.02 ± 12.7724494483110 (4)860127
CUBRIC28.04 ± 8.1628.42 ± 8.0613.56 ± 5.1814.81 ± 9.913434484800440 (4)96
EKUT_A34.82 ± 11.3833.58 ± 11.0717.04 ± 11.0916.84 ± 13.18302849476053696
EKUT_B35.33 ± 12.2731.13 ± 10.7417.32 ± 10.814.45 ± 11.1491818240016842
EPICZ30.48 ± 9.3930.42 ± 10.13--59711161131927067229
EPIGEN_3.034.75 ± 9.3636.2 ± 9.9717.03 ± 13.718.93 ± 10.883037706085047130
EPIGEN_1.531.7 ± 9.2437.46 ± 10.6914.51 ± 11.822.68 ± 14.282435475227250099
Florence35.29 ± 8.4828 ± 7.7712.69 ± 8.0214.27 ± 8.0681214310 (1)052545
Greifswald42.26 ± 14.9726.23 ± 7.4928.12 ± 17.8614.13 ± 12.816021993900390138
IDIBAPS-HCP33.13 ± 5.9936.77 ± 9.5218.07 ± 11.7217.64 ± 10.5129675211517360 (3)59167
KCL_CNS31.68 ± 8.433.2 ± 8.913.22 ± 8.220.67 ± 11.2354501019650 (4)3255197
KCL_CRF28.73 ± 8.2931.47 ± 11.3323.13 ± 7.558.33 ± 9.9916726150 (3)0 (2)0 (4)641
Kuopio25.16 ± 1.5533.35 ± 11.2124 ± 13.229.35 ± 11.2333135672400936195307
MNI30.74 ± 7.3832.53 ± 9.9216.48 ± 9.7216.05 ± 11.322171461284538045174
NYU30.1 ± 10.3633.23 ± 9.6616.96 ± 11.2716.43 ± 12.7629311815981136104277
RMH39.35 ± 20.2638.08 ± 15.9128.23 ± 17.9810.18 ± 12.6512702814622132586174
UCSD36.89 ± 15.137.67 ± 11.7919.32 ± 14.7718.8 ± 15.361622374314802180
UNAM33.2 ± 12.2931.47 ± 11.8116.26 ± 11.3315.03 ± 12.5325243536101001671
UNICAMP34.39 ± 10.4539.98 ± 10.2512.07 ± 9.5227.96 ± 12.54249183398291107844060689
UNIMORE28.47 ± 5.2528.36 ± 10.2612.58 ± 8.1314.34 ± 10.94204734820 (3)0 (2)4037116
XMU31.54 ± 6.9928.79 ± 9.0617.04 ± 12.211.76 ± 8.784201358251511771
Combined33.31 ± 9.9134.36 ± 10.6517.63 ± 11.4717.42 ± 11.9994912281727214941533936710283876

Also provided is the total number of MTLE cases with left hippocampal sclerosis, MTLE cases with right hippocampal sclerosis, IGE and all-other-epilepsies (‘other’) cases per site. Research centres with fewer than five participants for a given phenotype are marked as ‘0’ for that phenotype, with the original sample size noted in parentheses.

SD = standard deviation.

ENIGMA - Epilepsy Working Group demographics, including age (in years), mean age at onset of epilepsy (in years), mean duration of illness (in years), sex, and case-control breakdown for participating sites Also provided is the total number of MTLE cases with left hippocampal sclerosis, MTLE cases with right hippocampal sclerosis, IGE and all-other-epilepsies (‘other’) cases per site. Research centres with fewer than five participants for a given phenotype are marked as ‘0’ for that phenotype, with the original sample size noted in parentheses. SD = standard deviation. Study flowchart. ILAE = International League Against Epilepsy; MOU = memorandum of understanding. To test for shared and syndrome-specific structural alterations, analyses included one group combining all epilepsies (‘all-epilepsies’; n = 2149), and four stratified subgroups: (i) left MTLE with left hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-L; n = 415); (ii) right MTLE with right hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-R; n = 339); (iii) IGE (n = 367); and (iv) all other epilepsies (n = 1028). Supplementary Table 2 lists all syndromic diagnoses included in the aggregate ‘all-epilepsies’ group. For the MTLE subgroups, we included anyone with the typical electroclinical constellation (Berg ), and a neuroradiologically-confirmed diagnosis of unilateral hippocampal sclerosis on clinical MRI. Participants were included in the IGE subgroup if they presented with tonic-clonic, absence or myoclonic seizures with generalized spike-wave discharges on EEG. Participants were included in the ‘all-other-epilepsies’ subgroup if they were diagnosed with non-lesional MTLE (43.3%), occipital (1.67%), frontal (8.78%), or parietal lobe epilepsy (0.84%), focal epilepsies not otherwise specified (37.03%), or another unclassified syndrome (8.37%; Supplementary Table 2). We excluded participants with a progressive disease (e.g. Rasmussen’s encephalitis), malformations of cortical development, tumours or previous neurosurgery.

MRI data collection and processing

Structural T1-weighted MRI brain scans were collected at the 24 participating centres. Scanning details are provided in Supplementary Table 3. T1-weighted images from cases and controls were analysed at each site using FreeSurfer 5.3.0, for automated analysis of brain structure (Fischl, 2012). Volumetric measures were extracted for 12 subcortical grey matter regions (six left and six right, including the amygdala, caudate, nucleus accumbens, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus), the left and right hippocampi, and the left and right lateral ventricles. Cortical thickness measures were extracted for 34 left-hemispheric grey matter regions, and 34 right-hemispheric grey matter regions (68 total; Supplementary Table 4). Visual inspections of subcortical and cortical segmentations were conducted following standardized ENIGMA protocols (http://enigma.usc.edu), used in prior genetic studies of brain structure (Stein ; Hibar , 2017; Adams ), and large-scale case-control studies of neuropsychiatric illnesses (Schmaal , 2016; Hibar ; van Erp ; Boedhoe ). Analysts were blind to participants’ diagnoses. Each analyst was instructed to execute a series of standardized bash scripts, identifying participants with volumetric or thickness measures greater or less than 1.5 times the interquartile range as outliers. Outlier data were then visually inspected, by overlaying the participant’s cortical segmentations on their whole-brain anatomical images. If the blinded local analyst judged any structure as inaccurately segmented, that structure was omitted from the analysis. The Supplementary material provides further information.

Statistical analysis

Participant demographics

All research centres tested for differences in age between individuals with epilepsy and controls using an unpaired, two-tailed t-test in the R statistics package (https://www.r-project.org). Each centre also tested for sex differences between individuals with epilepsy and controls using a chi-squared test in SPSS Statistics package (IBM Corp., Version 21.0).

Meta-analytical group comparisons

Each research centre tested for case-versus-control differences using multiple linear regressions (via the lm function implemented in R), where a binary indicator of diagnosis (0 = healthy control, 1 = person with epilepsy) was the predictor of interest, and the volume or thickness of a specified brain region was the outcome measure. We calculated effect size estimates across all brain regions using Cohen’s d, adjusting for age, sex and intracranial volume (ICV). ICV is a reliable, indirect measure of head size (Hansen ), used as a covariate in other large-scale ENIGMA collaborations (Schmaal , 2016; Hibar ; van Erp ; Boedhoe ). Cohen’s d effect sizes and regression beta coefficients were pooled across centres using a random-effects, restricted maximum likelihood method of meta-analysis via the R package, metafor (Viechtbauer, 2010). The Supplementary material provides additional details.

Meta-analytical regression with clinical variables

Each centre conducted a series of linear regressions, testing the association between subcortical volume or cortical thickness, and: (i) age at onset of epilepsy; and (ii) duration of epilepsy. All centres tested for interactions between diagnosis of epilepsy (including syndrome groups) and age at time of scan. Beta values representing the unstandardized slopes of each regression were extracted for each analysis. Sex and ICV were included as covariates in all secondary analyses.

Correction for multiple comparisons

We conducted four independent regressions (one case versus control regression, and three regressions with clinical variables) across 84 regions of interest, adjusting the statistical significance threshold to Pthresh < 1.49 × 10−4 to correct for 336 comparisons. To account for correlations between tests, we also applied a less conservative adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR), using the Benjamini and Hochberg method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). For clarity, we report only P-values significant after stringent Bonferroni correction; FDR-adjusted P-values are summarized in the Supplementary material.

Power analyses

Across all regions of interest, we calculated the sample sizes necessary to achieve 80% power to detect case-control differences, given the observed effect sizes at each region of interest, based on two-tailed t-tests, using G*Power Version 3.1. For each region of interest, we also estimated N: the total number of samples required, per group, to achieve 80% power to detect group differences using a t-test at the threshold of P < 0.05 (two-tailed).

Results

Participant demographics

The sample size-weighted mean age across all epilepsy samples was 34.4 (range: 26.2–40) years, and the weighted mean age of healthy controls was 33.3 (range: 25.2–42.3) years. The weighted mean age at onset of epilepsy and duration of epilepsy were 17.6 (range: 12.1–28.2) years and 17.4 (range: 8.3–28) years, respectively. Females comprised 57% of the total epilepsy sample (range: 34–75% by individual sample), and 53% of the controls (range: 31–71% by individual sample). Case-control differences in age were observed at 8 of 24 research centres, and case-control differences in sex were observed at 2 of 24 research centres (Supplementary Table 5); hence, age and sex were included as covariates in all group comparisons.

Volumetric findings

Compared to controls, the aggregate all-epilepsies group exhibited lower volumes in the left (d = −0.36; P = 1.31 × 10−6) and right thalamus (d = −0.37; P = 7.67 × 10−14), left (d = −0.35; P = 3.04 × 10−7) and right hippocampus (d = −0.34; P = 6.63 × 10−10), and the right pallidum (d = −0.32; P = 8.32 × 10−9). Conversely, the left (d = 0.29; P = 2.14 × 10−12) and right (d = 0.27; P = 3.73 × 10−15) lateral ventricles were enlarged across all epilepsies when compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2A). A supplementary analysis of all-epilepsies, excluding individuals with hippocampal sclerosis or other lesions, revealed similar patterns of volume loss in the right thalamus and pallidum, and bilaterally enlarged ventricles; however, volume differences were not observed in the hippocampus (Supplementary Table 6).
Table 2

Effect size differences between epilepsy cases and healthy controls (Cohen’s d) for the mean volume of subcortical structures, controlling for age, sex and intracranial volume

StructurePhenotypeCohen’s dSEZ score95% CIP-valueI2N80Number of controlsNumber of cases
Amygdala (LH)All-other-epilepsies0.3270.0655.0240.199–0.4555.05 x 10−745.4701481448998
Amygdala (RH)All-other-epilepsies0.2180.0573.7990.106–0.331.46 x 10−431.2563351422989
Hippocampus (LH)MTLE-L−1.7280.191−9.056−2.102 to −1.3541.35 x 10−1985.53271412410
All epilepsies−0.3530.069−5.121−0.488 to −0.2173.04 x 10−771.84512717072125
Hippocampus (RH)MTLE-R−1.9060.15−12.694−2.2 to −1.6116.36 x 10−3772.47661286336
All epilepsies−0.3360.054−6.175−0.443 to −0.2296.63 x 10−1054.80114117192129
Lateral ventricle (LH)MTLE-L0.4650.0895.2030.289–0.6401.96 x 10−743.124741417414
MTLE-R0.390.0814.8080.231–0.5491.52 x 10−626.7501051291338
All epilepsies0.2880.0417.0250.207–0.3682.14 x 10−1223.33819117222135
All-other-epilepsies0.1980.0454.3730.109–0.2871.23 x 10−50.2184021452996
Lateral ventricle (RH)MTLE-R0.4440.0656.8670.317−0.576.57 x 10−120.003811292338
MTLE-L0.3630.0933.9170.1814−0.5448.95 x 10−547.2271211418414
All epilepsies0.2680.0347.8640.2−0.3343.73 x 10−15022017222137
All-other-epilepsies0.2120.0464.5810.122−0.3034.62 x 10−63.5283501453996
Pallidum (RH)MTLE-L−0.4520.09−5.009−0.628 to −0.2755.48 x 10−743.985781406414
MTLE-R−0.4510.089−5.071−0.624 to −0.2763.96 x 10−736.432791278332
All epilepsies−0.3160.055−5.762−0.424 to −0.2088.32 x 10−955.57515917102112
All-other-epilepsies−0.2350.060−3.942−0.352 to −0.1188.07 x 10−536.1412861440976
Putamen (LH)MTLE-L−0.3850.079−4.878−0.539 to −0.231.07 x 10−628.4741071352410
Thalamus (LH)MTLE-L−0.8430.126−6.693−1.089 to −0.5952.19 x 10−1170.462241384408
All epilepsies−0.3580.074−4.839−0.503 to −0.2131.31 x 10−675.64912416872104
Thalamus (RH)MTLE-R−0.7270.103−7.066−0.928 to −0.5251.60 x 10−1251.499311285335
MTLE-L−0.4620.117−3.941−0.691 to −0.2328.12 x 10−567.376751412414
IGE−0.4030.087−4.633−0.574 to −0.2333.60 x 10−639.715981210363
All epilepsies−0.3680.049−7.476−0.464 to −0.2717.67 x 10−1444.82211717162137
All-other-epilepsies−0.3050.047−6.502−0.397 to −0.2137.92 x 10−114.9851701446998

CI = confidence interval; LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere; SE = standard error; I2 = heterogeneity index; N80 = number of subjects required in each group to yield 80% power to detect significant group differences (P < 0.05, two-tailed). Uncorrected P-values are reported. Subcortical structures that failed to survive Bonferroni correction (P < 1.49 x 10−4) are not reported (see ‘Materials and methods’ section for statistical threshold determination). See Supplementary material for a full list of volume differences with adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR).

Figure 2

Subcortical volume findings. Cohen’s d effect size estimates for case-control differences in subcortical volume, across the (A) all-epilepsies, (B) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with left hippocampal sclerosis (HS; MTLE-L), (C) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with right hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-R), (D) idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE), and (E) all-other-epilepsies groups. Cohen’s d effect sizes were extracted using multiple linear regressions, and pooled across research centres using random-effects meta-analysis. Subcortical structures with P-values < 1.49 × 10−4 are shown in heatmap colours; strength of heat map is determined by the size of the Cohen’s d (d < 0 = blue, d > 0 = yellow/red). Image generated using MATLAB, with annotations added using Adobe Photoshop. An interactive version of this figure is available online, via ‘ENIGMA-Viewer’: http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_subcortical.html. See Supplementary material for guidelines on how to use the interactive visualization.

Effect size differences between epilepsy cases and healthy controls (Cohen’s d) for the mean volume of subcortical structures, controlling for age, sex and intracranial volume CI = confidence interval; LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere; SE = standard error; I2 = heterogeneity index; N80 = number of subjects required in each group to yield 80% power to detect significant group differences (P < 0.05, two-tailed). Uncorrected P-values are reported. Subcortical structures that failed to survive Bonferroni correction (P < 1.49 x 10−4) are not reported (see ‘Materials and methods’ section for statistical threshold determination). See Supplementary material for a full list of volume differences with adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR). Subcortical volume findings. Cohen’s d effect size estimates for case-control differences in subcortical volume, across the (A) all-epilepsies, (B) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with left hippocampal sclerosis (HS; MTLE-L), (C) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with right hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-R), (D) idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE), and (E) all-other-epilepsies groups. Cohen’s d effect sizes were extracted using multiple linear regressions, and pooled across research centres using random-effects meta-analysis. Subcortical structures with P-values < 1.49 × 10−4 are shown in heatmap colours; strength of heat map is determined by the size of the Cohen’s d (d < 0 = blue, d > 0 = yellow/red). Image generated using MATLAB, with annotations added using Adobe Photoshop. An interactive version of this figure is available online, via ‘ENIGMA-Viewer’: http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_subcortical.html. See Supplementary material for guidelines on how to use the interactive visualization. The MTLE-L subgroup showed lower volumes in the left hippocampus (d = −1.73; P = 1.35 × 10−19), left (d = P = 2.19 × 10−11) and right thalamus (d = −0.46; P = 8.12 × 10−5), left putamen (d = −0.39; P = 1.07 × 10−6), and right pallidum (d = −0.45; P = 5.48 × 10−7). As in the overall group comparison, we observed larger left (d = 0.47; P = 1.96 × 10−7) and right lateral ventricles (d = 0.36; P = 8.95 × 10−5) in MTLE-L patients relative to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2B). The MTLE-R subgroup showed lower volumes across a number of regions in the right hemisphere only, including the hippocampus (d = −1.91; P = 6.36 × 10−37), thalamus (d = −0.73; P = 1.6 × 10−12), and pallidum (d = −0.45; P = 3.96 × 10−7), together with increased volumes of the left (d = 0.39; P = 1.52 × 10−6) and right lateral ventricles (d = 0.44; P = 6.57 × 10−12) compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2C). The IGE subgroup showed lower volumes in the right thalamus (d = −0.4; P = 3.6 × 10−6) compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2D). The all-other-epilepsies subgroup showed lower volumes in the right thalamus (d = −0.31; P = 7.9 × 10−11) and the right pallidum (d = −0.24; P = 8.1 × 10−5) compared to controls. The all-other-epilepsies subgroup also showed significant enlargements of the left (d = 0.33; P = 5.1 × 10−7) and right amygdala (d = 0.22; P = 1.46 × 10−4), and the left (d = 0.2; P = 1.2 × 10−5) and right lateral ventricles (d = 0.21; P = 4.62 × 10−6) compared to controls (Table 2 and Fig. 2E). All volume differences can be visualized using the interactive ENIGMA-Viewer tool (Zhang ), at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_subcortical.html (Supplementary material). Volume differences significant after FDR adjustment can also be visualized at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_subcortical_fdr.html (Supplementary Tables 26–30).

Cortical thickness findings

The all-epilepsies group showed reduced thickness of cortical grey matter across seven regions bilaterally, including the left (d = −0.38; P = 1.82 × 10−18) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.4; P = 8.85 × 10−20), left (d = −0.32; P = 2.11 × 10−15) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (d = −0.31; P = 2.09 × 10−9), left (d = −0.31; P = 2.05 × 10−6) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.32; P = 2.19 × 10−9), left (d = −0.19; P = 1.29 × 10−4) and right pars triangularis (d = −0.2; P = 4.25 × 10−8), left (d = −0.28; P = 1.51 × 10−7) and right superior frontal gyri (d = −0.27; P = 4.49 × 10−6), left (d = −0.19; P = 1.05 × 10−5) and right transverse temporal gyri (d = −0.18; P = 2.81 × 10−5), and left (d = −0.23; P = 9.87 × 10−5) and right supramarginal gyri (d = −0.22; P = 5.24 × 10−5). The all-epilepsies group also showed unilaterally thinner right cuneus (d = −0.2; P = 9.68 × 10−8), right pars opercularis (d = −0.18; P = 6.48 × 10−7), right precuneus (d = −0.28; P = 2.7 × 10−5), and left entorhinal gyrus (d = −0.26; P = 2.04 × 10−5), compared to healthy controls (Table 3 and Fig. 3A). Supplementary analysis in a non-lesional epilepsy subgroup revealed a similar pattern of cortical thickness differences compared to controls, suggesting that the changes observed in our main analysis were not driven by the inclusion of patients with hippocampal sclerosis or other common lesions (Supplementary Table 7).
Table 3

Effect size differences between epilepsy cases and healthy controls (Cohen’s d) for the mean thickness of cortical structures, controlling for age, sex and intracranial volume

StructurePhenotypeCohen’s dSEZ score95% CIP-valueI2N80Number of controlsNumber of cases
Caudal middle frontal gyrus (LH)MTLE-L−0.4030.07−5.789−0.538 to −0.26637.07 x 10−913.807981344412
All epilepsies−0.3190.04−7.935−0.397 to −0.242.11 x 10−1517.11215616502061
All other epilepsies−0.2910.045−6.425−0.38 to −0.2021.32 x 10−10019714471000
Caudal middle frontal gyrus (RH)MTLE-L−0.4410.087−5.089−0.611 to −0.2713.61 x 10−739.444821348412
All epilepsies−0.3070.051−5.991−0.407 to −0.2062.09 x 10−946.44316816532059
All other epilepsies−0.2120.045−4.699−0.301 to −0.1242.62 x 10−603501451998
Cuneus (RH)All other epilepsies−0.2340.045−5.186−0.323 to −0.1462.15 x 10−702881449996
All epilepsies−0.2040.038−5.333−0.279 to −0.1299.68 x10−811.42337916512057
Entorhinal gyrus (LH)MTLE-L−0.4450.072−6.158−0.5865 to −0.3037.35 x 10−100811102303
All epilepsies−0.2640.062−4.261−0.385 to −0.1422.04 x 10−556.64822714021724
Fusiform gyrus (LH)MTLE-L−0.3590.069−5.183−0.494 to −0.2232.19 x 10−713.4651231339412
Lateral occipital gyrus (RH)All other epilepsies−0.2110.045−4.659−0.299 to −0.1223.18 x 10−62.50 x 10−33541450997
Lingual gyrus (RH)All other epilepsies−0.1800.045−3.972−0.268 to −0.0917.12 x 10−51.25 x 10−24911450996
Paracentral gyrus (LH)MTLE-R−0.5050.102−4.944−0.705 to −0.3057.67 x 10−752.283631292338
MTLE-L−0.4260.099−4.313−0.62 to −0.2321.61 x 10−553.165881344412
All epilepsies−0.3110.065−4.748−0.439 to −0.1822.05 x 10−667.47616416502061
All other epilepsies−0.2570.045−5.680−0.346 to −0.1681.34 x 10−8023914471000
Paracentral gyrus (RH)MTLE-R−0.4210.064−6.538−0.548 to −0.2956.24 x 10−110.407901296338
MTLE-L−0.3780.075−5.021−0.526 to −0.2315.14 x 10−723.5361111348412
All other epilepsies−0.3510.045−7.733−0.44 to −0.2621.05 x 10−143.43 x 10−31291451998
All epilepsies−0.3150.053−5.983−0.418 to −0.2122.19 x 10−949.26116016542059
Parahippocampal gyrus (LH)MTLE-L−0.30.073−4.11−0.444 to −0.15723.95 x 10−519.3661761335410
Pars opercularis (RH)MTLE-R−0.2710.071−3.8−0.411 to −0.1311.45 x 10−412.1052151295338
All epilepsies−0.1770.036−4.976−0.247 to −0.1076.48 x 10−72.62450316522059
Pars triangularis (LH)All epilepsies−0.1920.05−3.828−0.2897 to −0.0941.29 x 10−444.41442716502060
Pars triangularis (RH)MTLE-L−0.2850.06−4.738−0.403 to −0.1672.16 x 10−601951346412
All epilepsies−0.1990.036−5.48−0.27 to −0.1284.25 x 10−84.6639816522058
All other epilepsies−0.2100.045−4.650−0.299 to −0.1223.32 x 10−62.58 x 10−33571449998
Precentral gyrus (LH)MTLE-L−0.4660.081−5.755−0.625 to −0.3078.64 x 10−931.602741339412
MTLE-R−0.4150.09−4.596−0.592 to −0.2384.31 x 10−640.044931287338
All epilepsies−0.3840.044−8.768−0.469 to −0.2981.82 x 10−1827.64910816452058
All other epilepsies−0.3750.046−8.237−0.464 to −0.2861.76 x 10−165.59 x 10−31131442997
IGE−0.3420.071−4.78−0.482 to −0.2011.75 x 10−60.0031361043297
Precentral gyrus (RH)MTLE-R−0.520.086−6.073−0.687 to −0.3521.25 x 10−933.288601293337
MTLE-L−0.4920.078−6.335−0.6436 to −0.3392.37 x 10−1026.33661345412
All epilepsies−0.3990.044−9.102−0.485 to −0.3138.85 x 10−2027.92910016492054
IGE−0.390.072−5.442−0.531 to −0.255.27 x 10−80.0051051044295
All other epilepsies−0.3480.045−7.672−0.437 to −0.2591.70 x 10−1401311448996
Precuneus (LH)MTLE-L−0.5360.135−3.965−0.801 to −0.2717.35 x 10−575.18561343412
All other epilepsies−0.1780.047−3.819−0.27 to −0.0871.34 x 10−44.4744971446998
Precuneus (RH)MTLE-L−0.4730.104−4.558−0.676 to −0.275.16 x 10−657.498721348412
All epilepsies−0.2750.066−4.197−0.404 to −0.1472.70 x 10−567.60820916542055
All other epilepsies−0.2380.053−4.471−0.343 to −0.1347.78 x 10−622.3782791451994
Superior frontal gyrus (LH)MTLE-L−0.4110.06−6.804−0.529 to −0.2921.02 x 10−110941343412
All epilepsies−0.2830.054−5.251−0.389 to −0.1771.51 x 10−751.77319716492059
All other epilepsies−0.2430.059−4.138−0.358 to −0.1283.51 x 10−534.5452671446999
Superior frontal gyrus (RH)MTLE-L−0.3650.06−6.051−0.483 to −0.2461.44 x 10−901191345412
All epilepsies−0.2690.059−4.588−0.385 to −0.1544.49 x 10−659.48321816502058
All other epilepsies−0.2350.052−4.489−0.337 to −0.1327.15 x 10−620.0492861448997
Superior parietal gyrus (LH)All other epilepsies−0.2240.045−4.954−0.313 to −0.1367.27 x 10−70.0013141444996
Superior parietal gyrus (RH)All other epilepsies−0.2200.045−4.864−0.309 to −0.1311.15 x 10−60.0023261450997
Supramarginal gyrus (LH)All epilepsies−0.2320.06−3.894−0.348 to −0.1159.87 x 10−559.39129316061965
Supramarginal gyrus (RH)All epilepsies−0.2230.055−4.045−0.331 to −0.1155.24 x 10−552.89531715971971
All other epilepsies−0.2060.047−4.418−0.297 to −0.1159.95 x 10−603711395961
Temporal pole (LH)MTLE-L−0.3150.068−4.649−0.447 to −0.1823.33 x 10−610.9011601341410
Transverse temporal gyrus (LH)MTLE-R−0.3120.073−4.249−0.456 to −0.1682.15 x 10−515.6141631289338
All epilepsies−0.1920.044−4.406−0.278 to −0.1071.05 x 10−528.17842716472061
Transverse temporal gyrus (RH)All epilepsies−0.1820.044−4.188−0.267 to −0.0972.81 x 10−527.91847516542059
All other epilepsies−0.180.045−3.982−0.269 to −0.0916.84 x 10−50.0124861451998

CI = confidence interval; LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere; SE = standard error; I2 = heterogeneity index; N80 = number of subjects required in each group to yield 80% power to detect significant group differences (P < 0.05, two-tailed). Uncorrected P-values are reported. Cortical regions that failed to survive Bonferroni correction (P < 1.49 x 10−4) are not reported (see ‘Materials and methods’ section for statistical threshold determination). See Supplementary material for a full list of cortical differences with adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR).

Figure 3

Cortical thickness findings. Cohen’s d effect size estimates for case-control differences in cortical thickness, across the (A) all-epilepsies, (B) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with left hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-L), (C) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with right hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-R), (D) idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE), and (E) all-other-epilepsies groups. Cohen’s d effect sizes were extracted using multiple linear regressions, and pooled across research centres using random-effects meta-analysis. Cortical structures with P-values < 1.49 × 10−4 are shown in heatmap colours; strength of heat map is determined by the size of the Cohen’s d (d < 0 = blue, d > 0 = yellow/red). Image generated using MATLAB with annotations added using Adobe Photoshop. An interactive version of this figure is available online, via ‘ENIGMA-Viewer’: http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_cortical.html. See Supplementary material for guidelines on how to use the interactive visualization. HS = hippocampal sclerosis.

Effect size differences between epilepsy cases and healthy controls (Cohen’s d) for the mean thickness of cortical structures, controlling for age, sex and intracranial volume CI = confidence interval; LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere; SE = standard error; I2 = heterogeneity index; N80 = number of subjects required in each group to yield 80% power to detect significant group differences (P < 0.05, two-tailed). Uncorrected P-values are reported. Cortical regions that failed to survive Bonferroni correction (P < 1.49 x 10−4) are not reported (see ‘Materials and methods’ section for statistical threshold determination). See Supplementary material for a full list of cortical differences with adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR). Cortical thickness findings. Cohen’s d effect size estimates for case-control differences in cortical thickness, across the (A) all-epilepsies, (B) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with left hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-L), (C) mesial temporal lobe epilepsies with right hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-R), (D) idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE), and (E) all-other-epilepsies groups. Cohen’s d effect sizes were extracted using multiple linear regressions, and pooled across research centres using random-effects meta-analysis. Cortical structures with P-values < 1.49 × 10−4 are shown in heatmap colours; strength of heat map is determined by the size of the Cohen’s d (d < 0 = blue, d > 0 = yellow/red). Image generated using MATLAB with annotations added using Adobe Photoshop. An interactive version of this figure is available online, via ‘ENIGMA-Viewer’: http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_cortical.html. See Supplementary material for guidelines on how to use the interactive visualization. HS = hippocampal sclerosis. The MTLE-L and MTLE-R subgroups showed distinct patterns of cortical thickness reductions when compared to healthy controls (Table 3, Fig. 3B and C). In MTLE-R, lower cortical thickness was reported across four motor regions, including the left (d = −0.51; P = 7.67 × 10−7) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.42; P = 6.24 × 10−11), and the left (d = −0.42; P = 4.31 × 10−6) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.52; P = 1.25 × 10−9). The MTLE-R subgroup also showed thickness changes in the left transverse temporal gyrus (d = −0.31; P = 2.15 × 10−5), and right pars opercularis (d = −0.27; P = 1.45 × 10−4) (Table 3 and Fig. 3C). By contrast, in MTLE-L, lower thickness was observed across six regions of the motor cortex, including the left (d = −0.43; P = 1.61 × 10−5) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.38; P = 5.14 × 10−7), left (d = −0.47; P = 8.64 × 10−9) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.49; P = 2.37 × 10−10), and left (d = −0.54; P = 7.35 × 10−5) and right precuneus (d = −0.47; P = 5.16 × 10−6). The MTLE-L group also showed thickness changes across five regions of the frontal cortex, including the left (d = −0.41; P = 1.02 × 10−11) and right superior frontal gyri (d = −0.37; P = 1.44 × 10−9), left (d = −0.4; P = 7.07 × 10−9) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (d = −0.44; P = 3.61 × 10−7), and the right pars triangularis (d = −0.29; P = 2.16 × 10−6). In MTLE-L, thickness alterations were also observed in four regions of the temporal cortex, including the left temporopolar cortex (d = −0.32; P = 3.33 × 10−6), left parahippocampal gyrus (d = −0.3; P = 3.95 × 10−5), left entorhinal gyrus (d = −0.45; P = 7.35 × 10−10), and left fusiform gyrus (d = −0.36; P = 2.19 × 10−7) (Table 3 and Fig. 3B). The IGE subgroup showed reduced thickness in the left (d = −0.34; P = 1.75 × 10−6) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.39; P = 5.27 × 10−8), when compared to healthy controls (Table 3 and Fig. 3D). The all-other-epilepsies subgroup showed lower thickness across six cortical regions bilaterally, including the left (d = −0.38; P = 1.76 × 10−16) and right precentral gyri (d = −0.35; P = 1.7 × 10−14), left (d = −0.26; P = 1.34 × 10−8) and right paracentral gyri (d = −0.35; P = 1.1 × 10−14), left (d = −0.29; P = 1.32 × 10−10) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (d = −0.21; P = 2.62 × 10−6), left (d = −0.22; P = 7.27 × 10−7) and right superior parietal gyri (d = −0.22; P = 1.15 × 10−6), left (d = −0.24; P = 3.51 × 10−5) and right superior frontal gyri (d = −0.23; P = 7.15 × 10−6), and the left (d = −0.18; P = 1.34 × 10−4) and right precuneus (d = −0.24; P = 7.78 × 10−6) compared to controls. The all-other-epilepsies group also showed unilaterally reduced thickness in six right hemispheric regions, including the cuneus (d = −0.23; P = 2.15 × 10−7), lateral occipital gyrus (d = −0.21; P = 3.18 × 10−6), pars triangularis (d = −0.21; P = 3.32 × 10−6), supramarginal gyrus (d = −0.21; P = 9.95 × 10−6), transverse temporal gyrus (d = −0.18; P = 6.84 × 10−5), and lingual gyrus (d = −0.18; P = 7.12 × 10−5), compared to controls (Table 3 and Fig. 3E). An interactive 3D visualization of these results is available via the ENIGMA-Viewer tool (Zhang ), at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_cortical.html (Supplementary material). Cortical thickness differences significant after FDR adjustment can also be visualized at http://enigma-viewer.org/ENIGMA_epilepsy_cortical_fdr.html (Supplementary Tables 31–35).

Duration of illness, age at onset, and age-by-diagnosis effects on brain abnormalities

A secondary analysis identified significant associations between duration of epilepsy and several affected brain regions in the all-epilepsies, MTLE-R, and all-other-epilepsies groups. In the all-epilepsies group, duration of epilepsy negatively associated with volume measures in the left hippocampus (b = −8.32; P = 8.16 × 10−13), left (b = −13.58; P = 3.52 × 10−15), and right thalamus (b = −12.25; P = 1.58 × 10−13), and right pallidum (b = −2.67; P = 1.78 × 10−7), in addition to bilateral thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 2.99 × 10−11) and right pars triangularis (b = −0.002; P = 4.24 × 10−9), left (b = −0.003; P = 1.61 × 10−15) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 1.65 × 10−17), left (b = −0.003; P = 1.77 × 10−13) and right supramarginal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 2.58 × 10−19), left (b = −0.003; P = 5.84 × 10− 12) and right precentral gyri (b = −0.003; P = 2.54 × 10−24), left (b = −0.004; P = 1.94 × 10−12) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 4.65 × 10−11), left (b = −0.004; P = 1.05 × 10−10) and right transverse temporal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 8.24 × 10−10), and left (b = −0.002; P = 5.22 × 10−6) and right paracentral gyri (b = −0.002; P = 5.63 × 10−6). Duration of epilepsy also negatively associated with unilateral thickness measures in the right precuneus (b = −0.003; P = 6.03 × 10−21), right pars opercularis (b = −0.003; P = 5.59 × 10−13), and right cuneus (b = −0.002; P = 1.1 × 10−9; Supplementary Table 8). In the MTLE-R subgroup, duration of epilepsy negatively associated with volume measures in the right hippocampus (b = −22.42; P = 1.1 × 10−7), and the right thalamus (b = −18.11; P = 1.84 × 10−5), and thickness measures in the left transverse temporal gyrus (b = −0.007; P = 8.39 × 10−5; Supplementary Table 8). In the all-other-epilepsies subgroup, duration of epilepsy negatively associated with bilateral thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 3.39 × 10−7) and right caudal middle frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 6.91 × 10−8), left (b = −0.003; P = 1.36 × 10−9) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 3.16 × 10−7), and the left (b = −0.003; P = 3.17 × 10−5) and right precuneus (b = −0.003; P = 5.01 × 10−9), in addition to unilateral thickness measures in the right precentral gyrus (b = −0.004; P = 1.16 × 10−12), right cuneus (b = −0.003; P = 8.57 × 10−8), right pars triangularis (b = −0.003; P = 5.16 × 10−7), and right supramarginal gyrus (b = −0.003; P = 2.24 × 10−7). Duration of epilepsy also showed a positive association with the size of the left lateral ventricle in the all-other-epilepsies group (b = 13.6; P = 1.17 × 10−5). In the all-epilepsies group, age at onset of epilepsy negatively associated with thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 2.66 × 10−15) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.003; P = 9.77 × 10−10), left (b = −0.003; P = 2.78 × 10−9) and right pars triangularis (b = −0.003; P = 6.51 × 10−7), right pars opercularis (b = −0.003; P = 5.4 × 10−14), left transverse temporal gyrus (b = −0.003; P = 1.03 × 10−8), and right cuneus (b = −0.001; P = 4.9 × 10−6). In the all-other-epilepsies subgroup, age at onset negatively correlated with thickness measures in the left (b = −0.003; P = 3.21 × 10−8) and right superior frontal gyri (b = −0.002; P = 1.18 × 10−4), left (b = −0.002; P = 8.42 × 10−6) and right precuneus (b = −0.002; P = 7.23 × 10−5), right pars triangularis (b = −0.003; P = 2.53 × 10−5), and right supramarginal gyrus (b = −0.002; P = 2.38 × 10−6). Age at onset also positively associated with the size of the right lateral ventricle in the all-other-epilepsies subgroup (b = 57.73; P = 1.62 × 10−7). Age at onset negatively associated with other regional volumetric and thickness measures in the all-epilepsies, IGE, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, and all-other-epilepsies groups, but these associated areas showed no significant structural differences in the primary case-control analysis (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 8). There were no interaction effects between age and syndromic diagnosis in the all-epilepsies, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, IGE, or all-other-epilepsies groups.

Power analyses for detection of case-control differences

In our sample of 2149 individuals with epilepsy and 1727 healthy controls, we had 80% power to detect Cohen’s d effect sizes as small as d = 0.091 at the standard alpha level of P < 0.05 (two-tailed), and 80% power to detect Cohen’s d effect sizes as small as d = 0.149 at the study’s stringent Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 1.49 × 10−4. N, the number of cases and controls required to achieve 80% power to detect group differences using a two-tailed t-test at P < 0.05, ranged from N80 = 6, to detect group effects in the right hippocampus in our MTLE-R group, to N80 = 503, to detect group effects in the right pars opercularis in our ‘all epilepsies’ group (Tables 2 and 3).

Discussion

In the largest coordinated neuroimaging study of epilepsy to date, we identified a series of quantitative imaging signatures—some shared across common epilepsy syndromes, and others characteristic of selected, specific epilepsy syndromes. Our sample of 2149 individuals with epilepsy and 1727 controls provided 80% power to detect differences as small as d = 0.091 (P < 0.05, two-tailed), allowing us to identify subtle, consistent brain abnormalities that are typically undetectable on visual inspection, or overlooked using smaller case-control designs. This international collaboration addresses prior inconsistencies in the field of epilepsy neuroimaging, providing a robust, in vivo map of structural aberrations, upon which future studies of disease mechanisms may expand. In the first of five cross-sectional MRI analyses, we investigated a diverse aggregation of epilepsy syndromes, putative causes, and durations of disease. This all-epilepsies group exhibited shared, diffuse brain structural differences across several regions including the thalamus, pallidum, precentral, paracentral, and superior frontal cortices. With the exception of hippocampal volume and entorhinal thickness differences (Supplementary material), these structural alterations were not driven by any specific syndrome or dataset (Supplementary Figs 3 and 7). Our findings suggest a common neuroanatomical signature of epilepsy across a wide spectrum of disease types, complementing recent evidence for shared genetic susceptibility to a wide spectrum of epilepsies (International League Against Epilepsy Consortium on Complex Epilepsies, 2014). Some structural and genetic pathways may be shared across syndromes, despite the heterogeneity of epilepsy and seizure types. This shared MRI signature underpins the contemporary shift towards the study of epilepsies as network phenomena (Caciagli ). In MTLE, as expected, we observed hippocampal volume abnormalities ipsilateral to the patient’s side of seizure onset. Neither MTLE-L nor MTLE-R showed significant contralateral hippocampal volume reductions, confirming that sporadic, unilateral MTLE is not routinely underpinned by bilateral hippocampal damage (Blümcke ). Both MTLE groups showed extrahippocampal abnormalities in the ipsilateral thalamus and pallidum, with widespread reductions in cortical thickness, supporting a growing body of literature indicating that MTLE, as an example of a specific disease constellation in the epilepsies, is also a network disease, extending beyond the mesial temporal regions (Keller ; de Campos ). Disruption of this network, notably in the thalamus (Keller ; He ) and thalamo-temporal white matter tracts (Keller , 2017), may be associated with postoperative seizure outcome in MTLE. Patients with left and right MTLE showed distinct patterns of structural abnormalities when compared to controls, resolving conflicting findings from smaller studies, some reporting an equal distribution of structural differences (Liu ), and others indicating more diffuse abnormalities, either in left MTLE (Keller , 2012; Bonilha ; Kemmotsu ; de Campos ) or in right MTLE (Pail ). The structural differences observed in the present study may reflect a younger age at onset of epilepsy in left MTLE, which occurred, on average, 1.2 years earlier than those with right MTLE (Supplementary Table 20). Independent, large-scale studies of MTLE patients have confirmed a significantly earlier age at onset in left, compared to right, MTLE (Blümcke ). Duration-related effects were also observed in right, but not left, MTLE, pointing to possible biological distinctions between the two. In IGE, a clinically and biologically distinct group of epilepsies typically associated with ‘normal’ MRI on clinical inspection (Woermann ), we identified reduced volume of the right thalamus, and thinner precentral gyri in both hemispheres, supporting prior reports of structural (Bernhardt ), electroencephalographic, and functional (Gotman ) abnormalities in IGE. These IGE cases were considered typical by reviewing neurologists, suggesting that this common type of epilepsy is also associated with quantifiable structural brain abnormalities. The precentral gyri, site of the primary motor cortex, showed bilateral structural deficits across all epilepsy groups (all-epilepsies, IGE, MTLE-L, MTLE-R, and all-other-epilepsies), without detectable inter-cohort or between-disease heterogeneity (Supplementary Figs 3–12). Atrophy of the motor cortex has been linked to seizure frequency and duration of epilepsy in MTLE (Coan ); here, we observed a negative correlation between precentral (and postcentral) grey matter thickness and duration of epilepsy in the aggregate all-epilepsies group. The right thalamus also showed evidence of structural compromise across all epilepsy cohorts, re-emphasizing the importance of the thalamus as a major hub in the epilepsy network (He ; Jobst and Cascino, 2017). Loss of feed-forward inhibition between the thalamus and its neocortical connections may be epileptogenic (Paz and Huguenard, 2015), and thalamocortical abnormalities have previously been reported in IGE (Gotman ; Bernhardt ; O’Muircheartaigh ) and MTLE (Mueller ; Bernhardt ). These findings support prior ‘system epilepsies’ hypotheses of pathophysiology (Avanzini ), suggesting that a broad range of common epilepsies share vulnerability within a thalamocortical structural pathway involved in, and likely affected by, seizures (Liu ; Bernhardt ). Given this study’s cross-sectional design, we cannot determine if these are causative changes, consequences of recurrent seizures, prolonged drug treatment, or a combination of factors. The epilepsies, as a broad group, may involve progressive structural change (Caciagli ), indicating the need for large-scale longitudinal studies. A heterogeneous subgroup of individuals without confirmed diagnoses of IGE or MTLE with hippocampal sclerosis showed similar patterns of structural alterations to those observed in the aggregate all-epilepsies cohort. The findings included enlarged ventricles, smaller right pallidum and right thalamus, and reduced thickness across the motor and frontal cortices. Hippocampal abnormalities were not observed in this subgroup, suggesting that the patterns of reduced hippocampal grey matter observed in the aggregate group were driven by the inclusion of MTLEs with hippocampal sclerosis. Unlike the IGE, MTLE, and aggregate epilepsy cohorts, this subgroup also showed bilateral enlargement of the amygdala—a phenomenon previously reported in non-lesional localization-related epilepsies (Reyes ) and non-lesional MTLEs (Takaya ; Coan ). Non-lesional MTLEs formed a large proportion of this ‘all-other-epilepsies’ cohort (43.3%; 445 individuals), but the subgroup included many other focal and unclassified syndromes, potentially obscuring specific biological interpretations. Future, sufficiently powered studies will stratify this cohort into finer-grained subtypes to delineate syndrome-specific effects. Despite its international scale, our study has limitations. All results were derived from cross-sectional data: we cannot distinguish between historical acute damage and progressive abnormalities. We cannot disentangle the relative contributions of environmental and treatment-related factors, including antiepileptic medications, seizure types and frequencies, disease severity, language dominance, and other initial precipitating factors. On average, duration of epilepsy was at least 10 years; longitudinal investigations of new-onset and paediatric epilepsies will provide a more comprehensive understanding. Despite using standardized image processing protocols, quality control, and statistical techniques, some brain measures showed a wide distribution of effect sizes across research centres, which may reflect sample heterogeneity and differences in scanning protocols (Supplementary material). We observed modest thickness differences across the majority of cortical regions; Cohen’s d effect sizes ranged from small to moderate (d = 0.2–0.5), with some very small effects (d < 0.2) noted in the right pars opercularis, bilateral pars triangularis, and bilateral transverse temporal gyri of the aggregate all-epilepsies group. Other large-scale ENIGMA studies have reported similarly modest (albeit less widespread) cortical abnormalities in psychiatric illnesses including major depression (Schmaal ) and bipolar disorder (Hibar ). Although epilepsy is characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain (Fisher , our findings indicate that common epilepsies are associated with widespread, but relatively subtle, structural alterations of the neocortex. Replication in independent MRI cohorts, complemented by advanced imaging modalities and large-scale gene expression datasets, will help elucidate how these cortical abnormalities relate to underlying disease processes. Overall, in the largest neuroimaging analysis of epilepsy to date, we demonstrate a pattern of robust brain structural abnormalities within and between syndromes. Specific functional interpretations cannot be inferred from grey matter differences, but lower volume and thickness measures may reflect tissue loss, supporting recent observations that the common epilepsies cannot always be considered benign (Gaitatzis ; Bell ; Devinsky ). The study provides a macroscopic neuroanatomical map upon which neuropathological work, animal models, and further gene expression studies, can expand. Our consortium plans to investigate more specific neuroanatomical traits and epilepsy phenotypes, explore sophisticated shape and sulcal measures, and eventually conduct genome-wide association analysis of brain measures, to improve our understanding and treatment of the epilepsies.

Web resources

All image processing, quality assurance, and statistical analysis protocols for this study can be downloaded from the ENIGMA website, at: http://enigma.usc.edu/ongoing/enigma-epilepsy/enigma-epilepsy-protocols/. Click here for additional data file.
  77 in total

1.  Generalized epileptic discharges show thalamocortical activation and suspension of the default state of the brain.

Authors:  J Gotman; C Grova; A Bagshaw; E Kobayashi; Y Aghakhani; F Dubeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Asymmetrical extra-hippocampal grey matter loss related to hippocampal atrophy in patients with medial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  L Bonilha; C Rorden; J J Halford; M Eckert; S Appenzeller; F Cendes; L M Li
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  MRI analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy: cortical thinning and white matter disruptions are related to side of seizure onset.

Authors:  Nobuko Kemmotsu; Holly M Girard; Boris C Bernhardt; Leonardo Bonilha; Jack J Lin; Evelyn S Tecoma; Vicente J Iragui; Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Carrie R McDonald
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 4.  A meta-analysis on progressive atrophy in intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: Time is brain?

Authors:  Lorenzo Caciagli; Andrea Bernasconi; Samuel Wiebe; Matthias J Koepp; Neda Bernasconi; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Early onset of cortical thinning in children with rolandic epilepsy.

Authors:  Geke M Overvliet; René M H Besseling; Jacobus F A Jansen; Sylvie J M van der Kruijs; Johannes S H Vles; Paul A M Hofman; Saskia C M Ebus; Anton de Louw; Albert P Aldenkamp; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Large-scale brain networks are distinctly affected in right and left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Brunno Machado de Campos; Ana Carolina Coan; Clarissa Lin Yasuda; Raphael Fernandes Casseb; Fernando Cendes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Preoperative automated fibre quantification predicts postoperative seizure outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Simon S Keller; G Russell Glenn; Bernd Weber; Barbara A K Kreilkamp; Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern; Jan Wagner; Gareth J Barker; Mark P Richardson; Leonardo Bonilha
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Frequent seizures are associated with a network of gray matter atrophy in temporal lobe epilepsy with or without hippocampal sclerosis.

Authors:  Ana C Coan; Brunno M Campos; Clarissa L Yasuda; Bruno Y Kubota; Felipe Pg Bergo; Carlos Am Guerreiro; Fernando Cendes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Amygdala Enlargement in Patients with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy without Hippocampal Sclerosis.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Coan; Marcia Elisabete Morita; Brunno Machado de Campos; Clarissa Lin Yasuda; Fernando Cendes
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group.

Authors:  L Schmaal; D P Hibar; P G Sämann; G B Hall; B T Baune; N Jahanshad; J W Cheung; T G M van Erp; D Bos; M A Ikram; M W Vernooij; W J Niessen; H Tiemeier; A Hofman; K Wittfeld; H J Grabe; D Janowitz; R Bülow; M Selonke; H Völzke; D Grotegerd; U Dannlowski; V Arolt; N Opel; W Heindel; H Kugel; D Hoehn; M Czisch; B Couvy-Duchesne; M E Rentería; L T Strike; M J Wright; N T Mills; G I de Zubicaray; K L McMahon; S E Medland; N G Martin; N A Gillespie; R Goya-Maldonado; O Gruber; B Krämer; S N Hatton; J Lagopoulos; I B Hickie; T Frodl; A Carballedo; E M Frey; L S van Velzen; B W J H Penninx; M-J van Tol; N J van der Wee; C G Davey; B J Harrison; B Mwangi; B Cao; J C Soares; I M Veer; H Walter; D Schoepf; B Zurowski; C Konrad; E Schramm; C Normann; K Schnell; M D Sacchet; I H Gotlib; G M MacQueen; B R Godlewska; T Nickson; A M McIntosh; M Papmeyer; H C Whalley; J Hall; J E Sussmann; M Li; M Walter; L Aftanas; I Brack; N A Bokhan; P M Thompson; D J Veltman
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  103 in total

1.  Epileptic Seizures, Brain Volume Changes, and "Brain Damage": What Do We Know So Far?

Authors:  R Edward Hogan
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 2.  Neuroimaging and connectomics of drug-resistant epilepsy at multiple scales: From focal lesions to macroscale networks.

Authors:  Shahin Tavakol; Jessica Royer; Alexander J Lowe; Leonardo Bonilha; Joseph I Tracy; Graeme D Jackson; John S Duncan; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.864

3.  Structural Brain Alterations in Youth With Psychosis and Bipolar Spectrum Symptoms.

Authors:  Maria Jalbrzikowski; David Freedman; Catherine E Hegarty; Eva Mennigen; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Loes M Olde Loohuis; Roel A Ophoff; Raquel E Gur; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Can Big Data guide prognosis and clinical decisions in epilepsy?

Authors:  Xiaojin Li; Licong Cui; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.864

5.  Children with epilepsy demonstrate macro- and microstructural changes in the thalamus, putamen, and amygdala.

Authors:  Sarah J MacEachern; Jonathan D Santoro; Kara J Hahn; Zachary A Medress; Ximena Stecher; Matthew D Li; Jin S Hahn; Kristen W Yeom; Nils D Forkert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Temporal and extratemporal atrophic manifestation of temporal lobe epilepsy using voxel-based morphometry and corticometry: clinical application in lateralization of epileptogenic zone.

Authors:  Majdi Jber; Jafar Mehvari Habibabadi; Roya Sharifpour; Hengameh Marzbani; Masoud Hassanpour; Milad Seyfi; Neda Mohammadi Mobarakeh; Ahmedreza Keihani; Seyed Sohrab Hashemi-Fesharaki; Mohammadreza Ay; Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Community-informed connectomics of the thalamocortical system in generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Zhengge Wang; Sara Larivière; Qiang Xu; Reinder Vos de Wael; Seok-Jun Hong; Zhongyuan Wang; Yun Xu; Bin Zhu; Neda Bernasconi; Andrea Bernasconi; Bing Zhang; Zhiqiang Zhang; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Cortical morphology, epileptiform discharges, and neuropsychological performance in BECTS.

Authors:  Hisako Fujiwara; Jeffrey Tenney; Darren S Kadis; Anna Byars; Mekibib Altaye; Caroline Spencer; Tracy Glauser; Jennifer Vannest
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  fMRI-Based Effective Connectivity in Surgical Remediable Epilepsies: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  A E Vaudano; L Mirandola; F Talami; G Giovannini; G Monti; P Riguzzi; L Volpi; R Michelucci; F Bisulli; E Pasini; P Tinuper; L Di Vito; G Gessaroli; M Malagoli; G Pavesi; F Cardinale; L Tassi; L Lemieux; S Meletti
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Widespread cortical dyslamination in epilepsy patients with malformations of cortical development.

Authors:  David Tanne; Yaniv Assaf; Eyal Lotan; Omri Tomer; Ido Tavor; Ilan Blatt; Hadassah Goldberg-Stern; Chen Hoffmann; Galia Tsarfaty
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.