| Literature DB >> 29361940 |
Robert Verity1, Nicholas J Hathaway2,3, Andreea Waltmann4, Stephanie M Doctor5, Oliver J Watson6, Jaymin C Patel5, Kashamuka Mwandagalirwa7, Antoinette K Tshefu8, Jeffrey A Bailey2,3, Azra C Ghani6, Jonathan J Juliano5,9,10, Steven R Meshnick5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) bears a high burden of malaria, which is exacerbated in pregnant women. The VAR2CSA protein plays a crucial role in pregnancy-associated malaria (PAM), and hence quantifying diversity at the var2csa locus in the DRC is important in understanding the basic epidemiology of PAM, and in developing a robust vaccine against PAM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29361940 PMCID: PMC5782373 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2193-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Result of MAPI analysis. Black circles represent the 115 DHS clusters used in the analysis, grey borders give national and sub-national boundaries, and dark blue regions indicate major water bodies. The colour of each cell represents a weighted average of the pairwise genetic distance transecting that cell (white = no data). The two groups of outlined cells in the north have genetic distance that is statistically significant in permutation testing
Primers used
| Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|
| ATCATGGTGGAACACGAACA | GTACCCGCTTTACGGTTTCG |
Fig. 2Schematic of var2csa sequence variation. The proportion of non-gap sequences at each locus (i.e. one minus the proportion of gaps) is plotted for all nucleotide positions relative to Pf3D7 chromosome 12 and corresponding amino-acid positions. The four shaded regions have zero gaps, and were used in all analyses after the sequence alignment step. Our sequences mapped to 3D7 positions 54,271:54,663 and amino acid positions 715:845
Parameters of best-fitting GLM (Negative-binomial model: AIC = 634.8, compared with Poisson model: AIC = 662.1)
| Predictor | Estimate | Std. error | Z value | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | − 3.682 | 2.643 | − 1.393 | 0.164 |
| Prevalence | 27.063 | 8.905 | 3.039 | 0.002** |
| Sample size | 0.232 | 0.093 | 2.485 | 0.013* |
| Prevalence2 | − 18.229 | 8.694 | − 2.097 | 0.036* |
Significance codes: ** < 0.01, * < 0.1
Fig. 3Observed and model-predicted relationship between prevalence and allelic richness. Black circles represent data for each of the 115 clusters. Red shaded regions indicate the 95, 80 and 50% predictive intervals of the best-fitting model, and the red line represents the median prediction. The best fitting model also includes a sample size term, and so these predictions were generated assuming a sample size of 14 (the median sample size in the data)