| Literature DB >> 26915637 |
Stephanie M Doctor1, Yunhao Liu2, Amy Whitesell3, Kyaw L Thwai3, Steve M Taylor4, Mark Janko5, Michael Emch5, Melchior Kashamuka6, Jérémie Muwonga7, Antoinette Tshefu6, Steven R Meshnick3.
Abstract
Malaria surveillance is critical for control efforts, but diagnostic methods frequently disagree. Here, we compare microscopy, PCR, and a rapid diagnostic test in 7137 samples from children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo using latent class analysis. PCR had the highest sensitivity (94.6%) and microscopy had the lowest (76.7%).Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostics; Latent class analysis; Malaria; Microscopy; PCR; RDT; Rapid diagnostic test; Surveillance
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26915637 PMCID: PMC4841725 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803