| Literature DB >> 31640574 |
Molly Deutsch-Feldman1, Ozkan Aydemir2, Margaret Carrel3, Nicholas F Brazeau4, Samir Bhatt5, Jeffrey A Bailey2, Melchior Kashamuka6, Antoinette K Tshefu6, Steve M Taylor7, Jonathan J Juliano4,8,9, Steven R Meshnick4, Robert Verity5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug resistant malaria is a growing concern in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where previous studies indicate that parasites resistant to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine or chloroquine are spatially clustered. This study explores longitudinal changes in spatial patterns to understand how resistant malaria may be spreading within the DRC, using samples from nation-wide population-representative surveys.Entities:
Keywords: Drug resistance; Malaria; Spatial-temporal modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640574 PMCID: PMC6805465 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4523-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1DHS cluster locations of the children included in the analysis. Clusters are from 2007 (a) and 2013 (b). The 26 DRC municipal province borders are outlined in black
Fig. 2Frequencies of pfdhps and pfcrt mutations in 2007 and 2013. Wild-type genotypes are highlighted in red. Chi-squared tests were performed to statistically compare proportions; asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference in proportion between years
Individual and cluster level characteristics of all study participants, stratified by Pfdhps and Pfcrt genotype
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wildtype ( | Any | Wildtype ( | CVIET haplotype ( | |||
| Malaria prevalence (SD) | 59.3 (20.4) | 58.9 (21.8) | 0.872 | 60.04 (21.74) | 57.42 (22.24) | 0.125 |
| Anti-malarial use during pregnancya (SD) | 16.7 (16.6) | 22.2 (18.1) | 0.011 | 2.0 (6.2) | 1.9 (6.0) | 0.955 |
| Anti-malarial use amongst children (SD)b | 3.0 (6.4) | 2.0 (5.6) | 0.126 | 1.7 (4.4) | 1.6 (4.0) | 0.745 |
| Mean DHS Cluster size (SD) | 17.9 (18.0) | 19.3 (18.8) | 0.652 | 17.8 (19.07) | 20.0 (22.14) | 0.266 |
| % without education (SD) | 32.7 (23.48) | 23.1 (21.5) | < 0.001 | 28.8 (24.41) | 22.0 (20.16) | < 0.001 |
| % in lowest wealth category (SD) | 30.2 (23.0) | 21.4 (22.5) | 0.001 | 27.2 (22.5) | 20.5 (22.5) | < 0.001 |
| Number living in urban area (%) | 28 (34.6) | 154 (35.4) | 0.975 | 90 (29.4) | 135 (36.6) | 0.059 |
| Individual covariates: | ||||||
| Number female (%) | 41 (50.6) | 228 (52.5) | 0.845 | 153 (50.0) | 192 (52.0) | 0.654 |
| Median Individual Wealth Index (IQR) | 2 (1–3) | 3 (1–4) | 0.015 | 2 (1–3) | 3 (2–4) | < 0.001 |
*** p-values for tests conducted for comparisons between wildtype and mutant groups (Chi-squared tests for categorical data and t-tests for continuous data)
a Percentage of pregnant women reporting drug use; SP use is described by pfdhps status and chloroquine use by pfcrt status
b Percentage of children with a cough or fever that received SP or chloroquine; SP use is described by pfdhps status and chloroquine use by pfcrt status
Risk factors identified from final backwards selection multivariate risk factor model
| Covariate | Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 10% increase in malaria prevalence | 1.11 (1.06–1.17) | 0.024 |
| 10% increase in cluster SP usea | 1.14 (1.09–1.20) | < 0.01 |
|
| ||
| 10% increase in lowest education category | 0.92 (0.90–0.95) | < 0.01 |
a reported SP use amongst pregnant women
Fig. 3Spatial prediction maps comparing prevalence and spatial distribution of pfdhps and pfcrt mutations. Predictions were generated for 2007 (left panels) and 2013 (right panels). Clusters with at least one mutation are marked with a white “x”, clusters with no mutations are marked in grey circles. Horizontal black lines represent a 10% increase in prevalence