Literature DB >> 29361771

One-Pot Syntesis of 3-Functionalized 4-Hydroxycoumarin under Catalyst-Free Conditions.

Yang Gao1, Guo-Ning Zhang2, Juxian Wang3, Xiaoguang Bai4, Yiliang Li5, Yucheng Wang6.   

Abstract

A concise and efficient one-pot synthesis of 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives via a three-component domino reaction of 4-hydroxycoumarin, phenylglyoxal and 3-arylaminocyclopent-2-enone or 4-arylaminofuran-2(5H)-one under catalyst-free and microwave irradiation conditions is described. This synthesis involves a group-assisted purification process, which avoids traditional recrystallization and chromatographic purification methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin; catalyst-free; group-assisted purification process; multi-component domino reaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361771      PMCID: PMC6017609          DOI: 10.3390/molecules23010235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Heterocyclic compounds are important because of their presence in a broad range of natural products and synthetic organic molecules with various biological activities [1,2]. Coumarin scaffolds are commonly found in diverse natural products, biologically active compounds and pharmaceuticals [3,4]. Among the various coumarin derivatives, substituted 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives are of much importance because they exist in many natural products and exhibit a wide range of biological activities such as anti-HIV [5], anticancer [6], anti-coagulant [7] and antioxidant [8] activities. Warfarin I and coumatetralyl II are used for pesticides, specifically as a rodenticide and anticoagulant [9]. (Figure 1)
Figure 1

Biologically active coumarin derivatives.

The development of a simple and eco-friendly protocol for the construction of heterocycles libraries of medical motifs is an attractive area of research in both academia and the pharmaceutical industry. Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are promising and powerful tools in organic, combinatorial, and medicinal chemistry, because of their atom economy, complexity and diversity of products, multiple bond formation efficiency, and environmental friendliness [10]. These features make MCRs suitable for the easy construction of complex heterocyclic scaffolds from readily available starting materials [11]. In the past decade, some MCRs have been used for the construction of 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives [12,13,14,15,16]. Microwave irradiation has been increasingly used in organic synthesis in recent years. Compared with traditional methods, this method has the advantages of higher yields, shorter reaction time, mild reaction conditions and environmentally friendliness. To date, a large number of organic reactions can be carried out under microwave irradiation conditions [17,18,19,20]. The development of environmentally friendly synthetic methods is a challenge in modern organic synthesis. The need to reduce the amount of toxic waste and byproducts arising from chemical processes has resulted in an increasing emphasis on the use of less-toxic and environmentally compatible materials in the design of new synthetic methods. Traditional purification methods such as recrystallization and column chromatography have problems in terms of consumption of organic solvents and energy, waste generation, and pollution. The concept of group-assisted purification (GAP) techniques, which avoid traditional crystallization and chromatographic purification methods and reduce waste generation from silica and solvents, particularly toxic solvents, was first developed by Li’s group in the design of asymmetric synthesis of new imine reagents [21,22]. To date, GAP chemistry has been used in many asymmetric reactions [23,24,25] and MCRs [26,27,28]. As part of our current studies on the development of environmentally friendly routes to heterocyclic compounds [29,30,31,32], we now report an efficient and clean synthesis of 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives under catalyst-free conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

We initially evaluated the three-component reaction of a 1:1:1 mixture of 4-hydroxycoumarin (1), phenylglyoxal monohydrate (2a) and 3-(p-tolylamino)cyclopent-2-enone (3a) for the optimization of the reaction conditions. The results are summarized in Table 1. The desired product 4a was obtained in 89% yield when the reaction was carried out in ethanol at 100 °C for 30 min. under catalyst-free and microwave irradiation conditions (Table 1, entry 1). Various solvents were then evaluated to determine the impact of the solvent on the yield. Of all the solvents tested, i.e., anhydrous ethanol, water, DMF, acetonitrile, and a mixture of anhydrous ethanol-water (1:1 and 3:1, v/v), ethanol gave the best result (Table 1, entries 1–6). To improve the yield, several catalysts were evaluated: sodium hydrate, diethyl amine, p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TSA), benzoic acid and L-proline (Table 1, entries 7–11). The results revealed that none of the catalysts could catalyze this reaction. The reaction was then conducted at different temperatures, such as 80, 90, 100 and 110 °C, to determine the optimum temperature for this transformation. All of these experiments were conducted in ethanol under catalyst-free and microwave irradiation conditions, and the desired product 4a was obtained in yields of 69%, 76%, 89% and 87%, respectively (Table 1, entries 1 and 12–14). Finally, the reaction was performed at different reaction times to determine the optimum reaction time. The results showed that the best reaction time was 30 min (Table 1, entries 1 and 15–17). When the reaction was carried out in ethanol at refluxing temperature for 4 h in the absence of microwave, the desired product was obtained in 60% yield (Table 1, entry 18). These indicate that the microwave irradiation can improve the yield and shorten the reaction times. Accordingly, the best temperature for this transformation was 100 °C. On the basis of all of these experiments, the optimum reaction conditions were identified as ethanol at 100 °C for 30 min. under catalyst-free and microwave irradiation conditions.
Table 1

Optimization of the reaction conditions.

EntryCatalyst (mol %)Solvent (v/v)Temperature (°C)Time (min)Yield (%) a
1NoEtOH1003089
2NoH2O 1003036
3NoDMF1003070
4NoCH3CN1003080
5NoEtOH-H2O (1:1)1003054
6NoEtOH:H2O (3:1)1003072
7NaOH (20)EtOH1003033
8Et2NH (20)EtOH1003050
9p-TSA (20)EtOH1003080
10Benzoic Acid (20)EtOH1003051
11L-Proline (20)EtOH1003081
12NoEtOH803069
13NoEtOH903076
14NoEtOH1103087
15NoEtOH1001057
16NoEtOH1002065
17NoEtOH1004086
18NoEtOHReflux (absence of microwave)24060

a Yield was determined by HPLC-MS.

With optimal conditions in hand, various substituted phenylglyoxal monohydrate (2) and 3-arylaminocyclopent-2-enone (3) were explored to investigate the generality of this three- component reaction for the synthesis of 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives (4). The results are tabulated in Table 2. The reaction seemed to be tolerant of substitution of the phenylglyoxal and 3-arylaminocyclopent-2-enone with either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups. Overall, yields in the range of 70%–95% were obtained.
Table 2

Synthesis of 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives 4.

EntryR1R2ProductIsolated Yield (%)
1HCH34a86
2CH3Br4b90
3CH3Cl4c79
4CH3OBr4d85
5CH3OCH34e86
6CH3OCH3O4f81
7ClBr4g95
8ClCH34h72
9ClCH3O4i83
10BrBr4j70
11BrCH34k77
To our delight, under optimal conditions, further experiments showed that when the 3-arylaminocyclopent-2-enone (3) was replaced by 4-arylaminofuran-2(5H)-one (5), the corresponding 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives (6) were obtained in good yields (Table 3).
Table 3

Synthesis of 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives 6.

EntryR1R2ProductIsolated Yield (%)
1HBr6a89
2HCH3O6b84
3ClCH36c92
4ClCl6d70
5ClBr6e91
6BrCH36f91
7BrCH3O6g77
8CH3OCH3O6h91
9CH3OCl6i72
It is important that this synthesis followed the GAP chemistry (group-assisted-purification chemistry) process, which can avoid traditional recrystallization or column chromatographic purification methods. Pure products were obtained simple by filtration and washing of the solid with a little cold ethanol. The structures of compounds 4 and 6 were identified from their 1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectra, and by HRMS analysis. The structure of compound 4a was further confirmed using single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Crystal structure of compound 4a.

Although the detailed mechanism of this reaction remains to be fully clarified, the formation of compound 4 could be explained by the reaction sequence in Figure 3. First, a Knoevenagel condensation of 4-hydroxycoumarin 1 with phenylglyoxal 2 is proposed to give intermediate A. Michael addition of enaminone 3 to intermediate A then occurs to provide the intermediate B, which undergoes isomerization to form the desired product 4.
Figure 3

Proposed mechanism for the synthesis of compound 4.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

All reagents were commercial and used without further purification, unless otherwise indicated. Melting points were measured using an XT-4 micro melting point apparatus from Beijing Tech Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China and were uncorrected. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance III HD-400 MHz spectrometer from Billerica, MA, USA in DMSO-d6 solution. J values are in hertz (Hz). Chemical shifts are expressed in δ downfield from internal tetramethylsilane (TMS). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using Bruker MicrOTOF-Q II instrument from Billerica, MA, USA. X-ray crystal diffraction analysis was performed with a Bruker APEX-II CCD X-ray diffractometer from Billerica, MA, USA. Microwave irradiation was carried out with Initiator 2.5 Microwave Synthesizers from Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden. The reaction temperatures were measured by an infrared detector (external sensor type) during microwave heating.

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 3-Functionalized 4-Hydroxycoumarin Derivatives and

4-Hydroxycoumarin (1) (0.5 mmol), substituted phenylglyoxal monohydrate (2) (0.5 mmol), and 3-arylaminocyclopent-2-enone (3) or 4-arylaminofuran-2(5H)-one (5) (0.5 mmol) were placed in a 10 mL Initiator reaction vial, followed by anhydrous ethanol (2 mL). The reaction vial was then sealed and prestirred for 15 s before being irradiated in the microwave (time, 30 min; temperature, 100 °C; absorption level, high; fixed hold time). The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature to give a precipitate, which was collected by Büchner filtration. The solid material was then washed with a little cold ethanol to afford the desired products 4 or 6. 4-Hydroxy-3-(2-oxo-1-(5-oxo-2-(p-tolylamino)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-phenylethyl)-2H-chromen-2-one (4a). White solid, yield 86%, m.p. 134–135 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.26 (s, 1H, OH), 7.78–7.71 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.57–7.23 (m, 11H, ArH), 6.10 (s, 1H, CH), 3.03–2.96 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.71–2.64 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.47–2.42 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 203.6, 196.4, 176.9, 164.8, 163.6, 152.0, 136.4, 135.5, 132.4, 132.2, 129.8, 128.0, 127.7, 124.0, 123.8, 123.7, 117.6, 115.9, 111.5, 105.0, 40.3, 31.7, 26.7, 20.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H22NO5 [M − H]+ 464.1498. Found: 464.1515. 3-(1-(2-((4-Bromophenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-oxo-2-(p-tolyl)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4b). Brown solid, yield 90%, m.p. 139–140 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.20 (s, 1H, OH), 7.76–7.67 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.67–7.17 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.09 (s, 1H, CH), 3.09–3.02 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.76–2.70 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.48–2.38 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 204.5, 195.6, 175.8, 164.3, 163.6, 160.3, 151.9, 142.7, 137.8, 133.6, 132.2, 128.7, 127.9, 125.4, 124.1, 123.8, 118.1, 117.5, 116.0, 112.5, 105.3, 99.5, 31.9, 26.7, 21.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H23BrNO5 [M + H]+ 544.0760. Found: 544.0754. 3-(1-(2-((4-Chlorophenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-oxo-2-(p-tolyl)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4c). Brown solid, yield 79%, m.p. 142–143 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.22 (s, 1H, OH), 7.77–7.67 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.58–7.17 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.08 (s, 1H, CH), 3.09–3.01 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.75–2.69 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.47–2.41 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 204.4, 195.7, 175.9, 164.4, 163.6, 151.9, 142.7, 137.4, 133.6, 132.2, 129.9, 129.3, 128.7, 127.9, 125.1, 124.1, 123.8, 117.5, 116.0, 112.5, 105.3, 99.5, 31.9, 30.6, 26.7, 21.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H23ClNO5 [M + H]+ 500.1265. Found: 500.1252. 3-(1-(2-((4-Bromophenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4d). Green solid, yield 85%, m.p. 222–223 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.18 (s, 1H, OH), 7.77–7.74 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.63–6.91 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.05 (s, 1H, CH), 3.74 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.08–3.02 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.77–2.70 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.48–2.43 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 204.5, 194.4, 175.7, 164.3, 163.6, 162.5, 152.0, 137.8, 132.2, 130.1, 128.7, 125.3, 124.1, 123.8, 118.0, 117.5, 116.0, 113.4, 112.7, 105.4, 55.3, 32.0, 26.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H23BrNO6 [M + H]+ 560.0709. Found: 560.0706. 4-Hydroxy-3-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-1-(5-oxo-2-(p-tolylamino)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)ethyl)-2H-chromen-2-one (4e). Blue solid, yield 86%, m.p. 144–146 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.22 (s, 1H, OH), 7.78–7.73 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.58–6.90 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.05 (s, 1H, CH), 3.74 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.01–2.95 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.71–2.64 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.47–2.37 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.41 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 203.7, 194.5, 176.6, 164.7, 163.6, 162.5, 152.0, 135.7, 135.5, 132.1, 130.1, 129.8, 128.9, 124.0, 123.8, 123.7, 117.8, 115.9, 113.3, 111.8, 105.4, 55.3, 31.8, 26.7, 20.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C30H26NO6 [M + H]+ 496.1760. Found: 496.1757. 4-Hydroxy-3-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2-((4-methoxyphenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-2H-chromen-2-one (4f). Brown solid, yield 81%, m.p. 138–139 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.21 (s, 1H, OH), 7.77–7.72 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.58–6.90 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.03 (s, 1H, CH), 3.77 (s, 3H, CH3O) 3.74 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.94–2.88 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.65–2.58 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.45–2.36 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 207.4, 194.5, 177.2, 164.9, 163.6, 162.5, 157.5, 152.0, 132.1, 130.9, 130.1, 128.8, 125.7, 124.0, 123.8, 117.9, 115.9, 114.5, 113.3, 111.3, 96.9, 55.3, 31.6, 26.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C30H26NO7 [M + H]+ 512.1709. Found 512.1693. 3-(1-(2-((4-Bromophenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4g). White solid, yield 95%, m.p. 140–141 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.24 (s, 1H, OH), 7.79–7.73 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.64–7.25 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.10 (s, 1H, CH), 3.09–3.02 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.77–2.70 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.48–2.43 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 204.8, 195.8, 176.5, 165.0, 164.1, 163.0, 152.5, 138.2, 137.8, 135.5, 132.7, 130.0, 128.8, 125.8, 124.3, 118.7, 117.8, 116.5, 113.9, 112.7, 105.3, 55.8, 40.8, 32.4, 27.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C28H20BrClNO5 [M + H]+ 564.0213. Found: 564.0203. 3-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-(5-oxo-2-(p-tolylamino)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4h). Brown solid, yield 72%, m.p. 145–146 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.27 (s, 1H, OH), 7.79–7.72 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.58–7.24 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.10 (s, 1H, CH), 3.02–2.96 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.71–2.65 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.46–2.39 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 206.2, 195.5, 177.0, 163.5, 152.0, 137.2, 135.6, 135.1, 132.2, 129.8, 129.6, 128.3, 124.0, 123.8, 123.6, 116.0, 111.4, 93.7, 40.3, 31.7, 26.5, 20.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H23ClNO5 [M + H]+ 500.1265. Found 500.1257. 3-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-(2-((4-methoxyphenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4i). Brown solid, yield 83%, m.p. 140–141 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.29 (s, 1H, OH), 7.79–7.72 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.57–6.99 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.08 (s, 1H, CH), 3.77 (s, 3H, CH3O), 2.96–2.90 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.66–2.59 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.44–2.37 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 203.1, 195.5, 177.5, 165.2, 163.5, 157.6, 152.0, 137.2, 135.1, 132.1, 130.7, 129.5, 128.3, 125.6, 123.9, 123.8, 117.8, 115.9, 114.5, 110.9, 104.6, 55.3, 40.3, 31.6, 26.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H23ClNO5 [M + H]+ 500.1265. Found 500.1257. 3-(2-(4-Bromophenyl)-1-(2-((4-bromophenyl)amino)-5-oxocyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4j). Blue solid, yield 70%, m.p. 159–160 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.24 (s, 1H, OH), 7.76–7.68 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.64–7.25 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.08 (s, 1H, CH), 3.09–3.02 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.77–2.71 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.47–2.38 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 204.3, 195.5, 176.0, 164.6, 163.5, 152.0, 137.7, 135.4, 132.3, 132.2, 131.3, 129.7, 126.4, 125.3, 124.1,123.8, 118.2, 117.4, 116.0, 112.3, 104.7, 89.6, 40.3, 31.9, 26.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C28H20Br2NO5 [M + H]+ 607.9708. Found 607.9698. 3-(2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-oxo-1-(5-oxo-2-(p-tolylamino)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (4k). Brown solid, yield 77%, m.p. 161–162 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.27 (s, 1H, OH), 7.75–7.69 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.63–7.24 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.09 (s, 1H, CH), 3.02–2.96 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.71–2.65 (m, 1H, CH2), 2.45–2.38 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 203.5, 195.6, 177.0, 165.0, 163.5, 152.0, 135.6, 135.4, 132.2, 131.2, 139.8, 129.7, 126.3, 124.0,123.8, 123.6, 117.7, 116.0, 111.4, 89.7, 40.3, 31.7, 26.8, 20.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H23BrNO5 [M + H]+ 544.0760. Found 544.0762. 3-(1-(4-((4-Bromophenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6a). Pink solid, yield 89%, m.p. 221–223 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.51 (s, 1H, OH), 7.96–7.80 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.62–7.07 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.94 (s, 1H, CH), 5.25 (d, J = 15.6Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.15 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, H, CH2). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 195.8, 174.7, 163.4, 162.8, 162.2, 152.0, 138.6, 132.6, 132.3, 128.3, 127.7, 124.2, 123.7, 122.0, 116.4, 116.3, 115.8, 104.3, 94.6, 66.6, 40.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C27H19BrNO6 [M + H]+ 532.0396. Found 532.0402. 4-Hydroxy-3-(1-(4-((4-methoxyphenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)-2H-chromen-2-one (6b). Brown solid, yield 84%, m.p. 116–118 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.29 (s, 1H, OH), 7.93–7.79 (m, 3H, ArH + NH), 7.62–6.91 (m, 11H, ArH), 5.95 (s, 1H, CH), 5.08 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.89 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.73 (s, 3H, CH3O). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 196.0, 175.6, 163.7, 163.2, 162.6, 156.5, 151.9, 136.3, 132.4, 131.6, 128.2, 127.6, 124.1, 123.6, 123.2, 116.3, 114.9, 114.6, 104.6, 92.0, 66.5, 55.2, 40.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C27H19BrNO6 [M + H]+ 484.1396. Found 484.1402. 3-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-(2-oxo-4-(p-tolylamino)-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6c). White solid, yield 92%, m.p. 219–220 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.30 (s, 1H, OH), 7.97–7.80 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.62–7.03 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.94 (s, 1H, CH), 5.16 (d, 1H, J = 15.6 Hz, CH2), 5.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 194.9, 174.8, 163.1, 162.8, 152.0, 137.2, 136.4, 135.1, 133.5, 132.4, 129.9, 129.4, 128.4, 124.1, 123.6, 120.6, 116.3, 104.0, 92.7, 66.5, 56.0, 40.4, 20.3, 18.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C28H21ClNO6 [M + H]+ 502.1057. Found 502.1068. 3-(2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-(4-((4-chlorophenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6d). Pink solid, yield 70%, m.p. 208–210 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.53 (s, 1H, OH), 7.96–7.79 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.62–7.12 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.87 (s, 1H, CH), 5.21 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.12 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 194.8, 174.3, 163.1, 162.1, 152.1, 138.1, 137.2, 135.1, 132.4, 129.4, 128.4, 127.7, 124.1, 123.6, 121.7, 116.4, 103.7, 94.2, 66.4, 40.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C27H18Cl2NO6 [M + H]+ 522.0521. Found 522.0523. 3-(1-(4-((4-Bromophenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6e). Pink solid, yield 91%, m.p. 190–191 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.46 (s, 1H, OH), 7.97–7.80 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.62–7.08 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.91 (s, 1H, CH), 5.24 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.14 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 195.2, 174.8, 163.8, 163.3, 162.6, 152.5, 139.0, 137.8, 135.5, 132.8, 132.6, 129.9, 128.9, 124.6, 124.1, 122.5, 116.8, 116.2, 104.3, 94.8, 67.0, 19.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C27H18BrClNO6 [M + H]+ 566.0006. Found 566.0026. 3-(2-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-oxo-1-(2-oxo-4-(p-tolylamino)-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6f). Pink solid, yield 91%, m.p. 218–219 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.31 (s, 1H, OH), 7.96–7.71 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.65–7.02 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.91 (s, 1H, CH), 5.15 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.05 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.25 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 195.2, 174.7, 163.1, 162.9, 152.0, 136.4, 135.5, 133.4, 132.4, 131.3, 129.9, 129.5, 126.3, 124.1, 123.6, 120.6, 116.4, 103.9, 92.7, 66.4, 20.3, 18.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C28H21BrNO6 [M + H]+ 546.0552. Found 546.0543. 3-(2-(4-Bromophenyl)-1-(4-((4-methoxyphenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6g). White solid, yield 77%, m.p. 155–157 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.27 (s, 1H, OH), 7.93–7.70 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.73–6.90 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.86(s, 1H, CH), 5.05 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.95 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.73 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 195.1, 175.2, 163.7, 163.1, 162.6, 156.5, 152.0, 135.5, 132.4, 131.6, 131.3, 129.5, 126.4, 124.1, 123.6, 123.2, 116.3, 114.6, 104.2, 91.7, 66.3, 55.2, 40.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C28H21BrNO7 [M + H]+ 562.0501. Found 562.0493. 4-Hydroxy-3-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-(4-((4-methoxyphenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-2H-chromen-2-one (6h). White solid, yield 91%, m.p. 170–172 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.28 (s, 1H, OH), 7.94–7.77 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.63–6.91 (m, 10 H, ArH), 5.92(s, 1H, CH), 5.19 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.97 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.76 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.73 (s, 3H, CH3O). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 194.3, 176.0, 163.7, 163.3, 162.6, 156.5, 151.9, 132.4, 131.6, 129.9, 128.7, 124.1, 123.6, 123.1, 116.3, 114.6, 113.5, 105.0, 92.4, 66.6, 55.2, 39.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C29H24NO8 [M + H]+ 514.1502. Found 514.1495. 3-(1-(4-((4-Chlorophenyl)amino)-2-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-yl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-4-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (6i). Brown solid, yield 72%, m.p. 206–207. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.48 (s, 1H, OH), 7.97–7.78 (m, 3H, NH + ArH), 7.61–6.94 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.93 (s, 1H, CH), 5.25 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.14 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.76 (s, 3H, CH3O). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 194.1, 174.9, 163.4, 162.6, 162.1, 152.0, 138.2, 132.4, 129.9, 129.4, 128.7, 127.6, 124.1, 123.6, 121.5, 116.3, 113.5, 104.4, 94.8, 66.6, 55.3, 40.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calcd. for C28H21ClNO7 [M + H]+ 518.1007. Found 518.1018.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a novel, highly efficient, catalyst-free, green protocol for the one-pot three-component synthesis of 3-functionalized 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives. This protocol has the advantages of mild reaction conditions, high yields, convenient operation, and environmental friendliness.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Lessons from natural molecules.

Authors:  Jon Clardy; Christopher Walsh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Azacoumarin Fluorophores and the Fluorescence Characterization.

Authors:  Hikaru Takano; Tetsuo Narumi; Wataru Nomura; Hirokazu Tamamura
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 3.  N-Phosphonyl/phosphinyl imines and group-assisted purification (GAP) chemistry/technology.

Authors:  Guanghui An; Cole Seifert; Guigen Li
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  The stereoselective interaction of warfarin and metronidazole in man.

Authors:  R A O'Reilly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Synthesis, anticoagulant and PIVKA-II induced by new 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives.

Authors:  Omaima M Abdelhafez; Kamelia M Amin; Rasha Z Batran; Timothy J Maher; Somaia A Nada; Shalini Sethumadhavan
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Synthesis of heterocyclic [3.3.3]propellanes via a sequential four-component reaction.

Authors:  Abdolali Alizadeh; Atieh Rezvanian; Long-Guan Zhu
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Multicomponent Strategy to Pyrazolo[3,4-e]indolizine Derivatives under Microwave Irradiation.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Wang; Xian Feng; Zhan Xun; Da-Qing Shi; Zhi-Bin Huang
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 8.  Natural and synthetic coumarin derivatives with anti-inflammatory/ antioxidant activities.

Authors:  Konstantina C Fylaktakidou; Dimitra J Hadjipavlou-Litina; Konstantinos E Litinas; Demetrios N Nicolaides
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Ultrasound-promoted one-pot, three-component synthesis of spiro[indoline-3,1'-pyrazolo[1,2-b]phthalazine] derivatives.

Authors:  Juxian Wang; Xiaoguang Bai; Changliang Xu; Yucheng Wang; Wei Lin; Yi Zou; Daqing Shi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Ultrasound-promoted one-pot, four-component synthesis of pyridin-2(1H)-one derivatives.

Authors:  Jinming Yang; Qiang Li; Juanjuan Zhang; Wei Lin; Juxian Wang; Yucheng Wang; Zhibin Huang; Daqing Shi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The molecular diversity scope of 4-hydroxycoumarin in the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds via multicomponent reactions.

Authors:  Ghodsi Mohammadi Ziarani; Razieh Moradi; Tahereh Ahmadi; Parisa Gholamzadeh
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.943

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.