A thermostable Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1 was homologously produced and characterized. Chitinase Chi1 shows high thermostability at 40 °C (>140 h 90% activity), 50 °C (>168 h 90% activity), and 55 °C (half-life 48 h). Chitinase Chi1 has broad substrate specificity and converts chitin, chitosan, modified chitosan, and chitin oligosaccharides. The activity of Chitinase Chi1 is strongly affected by the degree of deacetylation (DDA), molecular weight (Mw), and side chain modification of chitosan. Chitinase Chi1 releases mainly (GlcNAc)2 from insoluble chitin and chito-oligosaccharides with a polymerization degree (DP) ranging from 2 to 12 from chitosan, in a processive way. Chitinase Chi1 shows higher activity toward chitin oligosaccharides (GlcNAc)4-6 than toward (GlcNAc)3 and is inactive for (GlcNAc)2. During hydrolysis, oligosaccharides bind at subsites -2 to +2 in the enzyme's active site. Chitinase Chi1 can be used for chitin valorisation and for production of chitin- and chito-oligosaccharides at industrial scale.
A thermostable Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1 was homologously produced and characterized. Chitinase Chi1 shows high thermostability at 40 °C (>140 h 90% activity), 50 °C (>168 h 90% activity), and 55 °C (half-life 48 h). Chitinase Chi1 has broad substrate specificity and converts chitin, chitosan, modified chitosan, and chitin oligosaccharides. The activity of Chitinase Chi1 is strongly affected by the degree of deacetylation (DDA), molecular weight (Mw), and side chain modification of chitosan. Chitinase Chi1 releases mainly (GlcNAc)2 from insoluble chitin and chito-oligosaccharides with a polymerization degree (DP) ranging from 2 to 12 from chitosan, in a processive way. Chitinase Chi1 shows higher activity toward chitin oligosaccharides (GlcNAc)4-6 than toward (GlcNAc)3 and is inactive for (GlcNAc)2. During hydrolysis, oligosaccharides bind at subsites -2 to +2 in the enzyme's active site. Chitinase Chi1 can be used for chitin valorisation and for production of chitin- and chito-oligosaccharides at industrial scale.
Chitin consists of
β-(1,4)-linked N-acetyl-d-glucosamine(GlcNAc) units and is one of the most abundant
polymers in nature. Chitin is a main component found in shells of
crabs, shrimps, and lobsters which are popular types of seafood. Every
year approximately 6–8 million tons of shell-waste are produced
from the seafood industry globally.[1] This
waste stream represents a cheap and renewable resource of chitin,
which can be used for production of value-added chemicals. Next to
crustacean waste, chitin can also be isolated from insects and fungi.
Products obtained from chitin and its deacetylated derivative chitosan
can be used in medical applications, packaging, food and nutrition,
biotechnology, agriculture, and environmental protection.[2,3] In recent years, special interest has been paid to water-soluble
chito-oligosaccharides, which can act as antimicrobial,[4] antitumor, and anti-inflammatory[5] agents. Chito-oligosaccharides can be produced by chemical
or enzymatic depolymerization of chitin and chitosan. Common procedures
for the production of chito-oligosaccharides rely on acid catalysis,
which is characterized by a low yield and high environmental impact.
The use of enzyme catalysis for depolymerization of chitin and chitosan
is a promising alternative to the chemical methods because it allows
the production of specific chitin- and chito-oligosaccharides in a
controlled way and environmentally friendly process.[6] Nevertheless, development of an efficient enzymatic process
requires fundamental knowledge of the catalytic mechanisms of enzymes
and understanding the interactions with their substrate.In
nature, chitin is degraded by three groups of enzymes: chitinases
(EC 3.2.1.14), releasing water-soluble chitin oligosaccharides from
chitin, N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.52), degrading
products released by chitinases to monomers,[7] and chitin-active lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs; EC
1.14.99.53) that cleave chitin crystalline chains in an oxidative
way, yielding a lactone (C1-oxidation) and a ketoaldose (C4-oxidation)
product.[8−10] The copper-dependent LPMOs act in synergy with chitinases
and enhance the accessibility of chitin chains for chitinases and N-acetylglucosaminidases by disrupting the crystal structure
of chitin and generation of more soluble polymer chains with increased
susceptibility for enzymatic hydrolysis. Based on the amino acid sequence,
chitinases have been classified into the glycoside hydrolase (GH)
families 18 and 19 and N-acetylglucosaminidase into
GH 20 and GH 3, according to the carbohydrate active enzymes classification
(CAZy; http://www.cazy.org/).Chitinases are spread in nature and are involved in physiological
processes of bacteria, archea, fungi, animals, and plants.[11,12] In recent years special interest has been paid to thermostable chitinases
from bacteria and fungi due to their potential application in bioconversion
of chitin waste and in the industrial production of chitin oligosaccharides
from chitin and chito-oligosaccharides from chitosan. The advantage
of thermostable enzymes is that these enzymes do not lose their activity
at higher temperatures which are implemented in bioconversion of waste
and in industrial processes.[6] A number
of thermophilic chitinases have been described from bacteria including Chitinophaga, Alcaligenes, Virgibaillus, Massilia, Paenibacillus, Streptomyces, Microbispora, Bacillus, and Brevibacillus.[6,13] However, only
a few thermophilic fungi have been explored for thermophilic chitinases
like Aspergillus fumigatus,[14]Chaetomium thermophilum,[15]Gliocladium catenulatum,[16]Rhizopus oryzae,[17]Thermoascus aurantiacus vs levisporus,[15]Thermomyces lanuginosus,[19,20] and Trichoderma viridae.[21]The thermophilic filamentous fungus Myceliophthora
thermophila C1 (previously known as Chrysosporium
lucknowense C1; Genencor International B.V., a DuPont company)
has been developed
for homologous and heterologous protein expression.[22]M. thermophila C1 has been used before
for production of different cell wall degrading enzymes as described
by Hinz and co-workers.[23,24] We reported before
that M. thermophila C1 produces an endochitinase
entitled Chitinase Chi1.[22] Dua et al.[25] published recently an exochitinase rMtChit from M. thermophila BJA produced from the same
gene sequence as Chitinase Chi1 by recombinant expression in Pichia pastoris; however, characteristics of exochitinase
rMtChit differed significantly from our Chitinase Chi1. Since Chitinase
Chi1 from M. thermophila C1 might have potential
application in bioconversion of chitin waste sources and in industrial
production of chitin and chito-oligosaccharides, a full characterization
of the Chitinase Chi1 and understanding of the interactions of Chitinase
Chi1 with its substrates is important. Here, we describe the production
and detailed characterization of Chitinase Chi1 with focus on thermostability,
catalytic properties, and mode of action on chitin, chitosan, and
chitin and chito-oligosaccharides.
Materials
and Methods
Chemicals
Chitin azure, chitin from shrimp shells,
glycol chitosan, Schiff’s reagent, 4-nitrophenyl-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc-pNP), 4-nitrophenyl-N,N′-diacetyl-β-d-chitobioside ((GlcNAc)2-pNP), and 4-nitrophenyl-β-d-N,N′,N″-triacetylchitotriose
((GlcNAc)3-pNP), were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
(St. Louis, USA). Oxidized chitosan (Mw 100 kDa, DDA 84%, degree of
oxidation 5%, containing C6-aldehyde and carboxyl groups in a ratio
of 20:1) was produced at Wageningen Food & Biobased Research (Wageningen,
The Netherlands). Hydroxypropyl-chitosan was a kind gift from Nippon
Suisan (Japan). Chitin oligosaccharides (GlcNAc)2–6 were obtained from Megazyme (Co. Wicklow, Ireland). Chitosans were
purchased from Heppe Medical Chitosan GmbH (Halle, Germany) and Nippon
Suisan Kaisha LTD (Tokyo, Japan). The deacetylation degree (DDA in
%) and molecular weight (Mw in kDa) are chitosan 88 DDA/3000 and chitosan
90 DDA/100 (Nippon Suisan Kaisha LTD), chitosan 77 DDA/600, chitosan
78 DDA/600, chitosan 91 DDA/600 and chitosan 94 DDA/600 (Heppe Medical
Chitosan GmbH). All other chemicals were of the highest purity available.
Swollen Chitin Preparation
Swollen chitin was prepared
according to Monreal and Reese[26] with some
modifications. Chitin from shrimp shells (1 g) was stirred in 25 mL
of 85% (v/v) phosphoric acid and left at room temperature for 20 h.
Subsequently it was precipitated by pouring the gelatinous mixture
into an excess of ice-cold water. The swollen chitin was separated
by centrifugation at 3000g and washed with demineralized
water up to pH 6.0.
Overexpression of Chi1 Gene in M.
thermophila C1 and 2 L-Scale Fermentation for Production
of Chitinase Chi1
Overexpression of Chitinase Chi1 in M. thermophila C1 and the 2 L-scale fermentation for production
of Chitinase Chi1
have been carried out based on the procedures previously reported:
(i) the DNA sequence of the gene encoding (Chi1)
for Chitinase Chi1 (GenBank accession number HI550986) was described
in a patent,[27] (ii) the homologous overexpression
of Chitinase Chi1 in M. thermophila C1 (previously
known as C. lucknowense C1) was described in detail
by Visser et al.[22] and (iii) the preparation
of a monocomponent strain of M. thermophila C1 producing
Chitinase Chi1 and the detailed conditions of the fed-batch fermentation
resulting in high production level of Chitinase Chi1 (7.5 g/L) were
also described by Visser et al.[22] In short,
the Chi1 gene was amplified from genomic M. thermophila C1 DNA and cloned into a M. thermophila C1 expression vector. The expression cassette containing the chi1 promoter, gene and the terminator obtained from the
vector was transformed into a low protease/(hemi)cellulase free M. thermophila C1-expression host. Ninety six transformants
were grown in a microtiter plate[28] and
screened for Chitinase Chi1 production levels in the culture broth
using chitin azure as substrate. The transformant showing the highest
level of chitinase activity was selected for fed-batch fermentation
to produce Chitinase Chi1 at 2-L scale. The strain was grown aerobically
in 2 L fermenters in mineral medium, containing glucose as carbon
source, ammonium sulfate as nitrogen source and trace elements for
the essential salts. The enzyme was produced at pH 6.0 and 32 °C.[27] The supernatant containing Chitinase Chi1 was
centrifuged at 20 000g for 20 min to remove
the biomass and concentrated (4 fold) using a 5 kDa PES membrane (Vivacell
70, Sartorius). The crude enzyme extract was subsequently dialyzed
against 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.0 and freeze-dried to
obtain the crude enzyme preparation. Freeze-drying was used to prevent
microbial decay of enzyme preparation and to avoid the use of preservatives.
Sequence Analysis of Chitinase Chi1
Nucleotide and
deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed using Clone Manager software.
BLAST analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of Chitinase Chi1
was performed at the NCBI server (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Analysis for conserved domains was performed using Conserved Domain
Search and Conserved Domain Database (containing information from
databases including Pfam, SMART, COG, PRK, TIGRFAM)[29] at the NCBI server (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi). The signal peptide was analyzed at the SignalP 4.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) and the theoretical isoelectric point (pI) was
calculated with Compute pI/Mw tool on ExPASy server (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/). Potential N-linked glycosylation sites and potential O-linked
glycosylation sites were predicted by NetOGlyc 4.0 Server and NetNGlyc
1.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/). To generate a 3D model of Chitinase Chi1 the deduced amino acid
sequence of Chitinase Chi1 was submitted to the Phyre2 web portal
for protein modeling.[30] The Phyre2 generated
the protein model on the basis of its closest template.
Purification
of Chitinase
The freeze-dried crude enzyme
preparation containing 142 mg of total protein was dissolved in 50
mL of 0.05 M Bis-Tris buffer pH 7.0 and purified by anion exchange
chromatography using a HiPrep DEAE FF 16/10 column (GE Healthcare
Bio-Science AB, Uppsala, Sweden) and an ÄKTA pure system (GE
Healthcare Bio-Science AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The column was equilibrated
with five column volumes (CV) 0.05 M Bis-Tris buffer pH 7.0 (buffer
A). A sample of 50 mL was loaded onto the column and eluted using
0.05 M Bis-Tris buffer pH 7.0 followed by elution with 1 M NaCl in
0.05 M Bis-Tris buffer pH 7.0 (buffer B) as follows: 20% buffer B
for 10 CV and 45% buffer B for 10 CV with a flow rate of 5 mL min–1. Fractions were collected and screened for chitinase
and N-acetylglucosaminidase activity. The fraction
containing (10 mL) the highest chitinase activity was subjected to
size exclusion chromatography and loaded onto a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex
75 pg column (GE Healthcare Bio-Science AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Proteins
were eluted isocratic with 0.05 M Bis-Tris buffer pH 7.0 containing
0.15 M NaCl with a flow rate of 0.5 mL min–1. The
absorbance was measured at 280 nm.
Enzyme Assays and Protein
Concentration
During the
purification process the activities of chitinase and N-acetylglucosaminidase were measured. Chitinase activity was determined
using colloidal chitin azure[31] as substrate.
The enzyme solution (0.05 mL) was incubated with 0.95 mL 5% (w/v)
colloidal chitin azure in 50 mM Bis-Tris buffer pH 7.0, and the mixture
was incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. After incubation, the reaction
was terminated by heating at 96 °C for 5 min, to inactivate the
enzyme. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 20 000g for 5 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured
at 560 nm. An enzyme-free mixture was used as negative control, and
each reported value was the average of duplicate tests. One enzyme
unit was defined as a change in the absorbance of 0.01 min–1.[32]For N-acetylglucosaminidase
activity, the reaction mixture contained 0.09 mL of 2 mM GlcNAc-pNP in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer pH 4 and 0.01 mL enzyme
solution. After 10 min incubation in a microtiter plate at 50 °C,
0.2 mL of 0.25 M Tris/HCl buffer pH 8.8 was added to the mixtures
and the absorbance at 405 nm was measured using a Tecan Safire plate
reader (Grodig, Austria). One enzyme activity was defined as the amount
of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol of pNP per
minute. The protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic
acid assay (BCA) according to the recommendation of the supplier (Pierce)
with bovine serum albumin as standard.
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide
Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)
Identification of Glycosylated Proteins and Isoelectric Point Determination
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide (10% (w/v)) gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) was performed as described by Laemmli.[33] A NuPAGE Novex System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bleiswijk,
The Netherlands) with 10% (w/v) Bis-Tris gels was used. Prior to electrophoresis,
all samples were heated for 10 min at 70 °C in NuPAGE LDS sample
buffer with NuPAGE sample reducing agent, according to the instructions
of the manufacturer. Gels were stained with SimplyBlue SafeStain according
to the recommendation of the supplier (ThermoFisher Scientific). For
detection of glycosylated proteins, the SDS-PAGE gel was stained using
periodic acid-Schiff staining (PAS).[34] The
gel was incubated subsequently for 1 h in 12.5% (w/v) trichloroacetic
acid, 1 h in 1% (v/v) periodic acid/3% (v/v) acetic acid, 1 h in 15%
(v/v) acetic acid (replaced every 10 min), and 1 h at 4 °C in
the dark in Schiff’s reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The
Netherlands). Hereafter, the gel was washed two times for 5 min in
0.5% (w/v) sodium bisulfite and destained in 7% (v/v) acetic acid.
The isoelectric point (pI) of Chitinase Chi1 was
estimated by isoelectric focusing (IEF) using PhastGel IEF on a Pharmacia
LKB Phast System (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) with a broad
protein calibration kit (pH 3–10, GE Healthcare) as standard.
Proteins were stained with Coomassie blue R-2.
Mass Spectrometry
The molecular weight of Chitinase
Chi1 was determined by matrix assisted laser-desorption time-of-flight
mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Samples were prepared by the dried
droplet method on a 600 μm AnchorChip target (Bruker), using
5 mg mL–1 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone, 1.5 mg mL–1 diammonium hydrogen citrate, 25% (v/v) ethanol, and
3% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid as matrix. Spectra were derived from
ten 500-shots (1000 Hz) acquisitions taken at nonoverlapping locations
across the sample. Measurements were made in the positive linear mode,
with ion source 1, 25.0 kV; ion source 2, 23.3 kV; lens, 6.5 kV; pulsed
ion extraction, 680 ns. Protein Calibration Standard II (Bruker) was
used for external calibration.
Purity and Identity of
Chitinase Chi1
To evaluate the
identity and purity of Chitinase Chi1, a sample containing the purified
Chitinase Chi1 was sent to The Scripps Research Institute, Proteomics
Core (Jupiter, FL, U.S.A.) for proteolytic digestion and HPLC-ESI-MS/MS
analysis.
Influence of Temperature and pH on Activity
and Stability of
Chitinase Chi1
Influence of temperature on activity of Chitinase
Chi1 was analyzed with swollen chitin as substrate in the range of
30–80 °C. The enzyme solution (0.05 mL) containing 1.6
μM Chitinase Chi1 was incubated with 0.95 mL of 1% (w/v) swollen
chitin in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer pH 6.0 at 50 °C
while mixing at 800 rpm for 30 min. The reaction was terminated by
heating at 96 °C for 5 min. The reaction mixture was centrifuged
at 20 000g for 10 min. The produced reducing
sugars in the supernatant were measured using the p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH) assay.[35] An enzyme-free mixture was used as negative control, and
each reported value was the average of duplicate tests. N-Acetyl-d-glucosamine was used as a standard, and one enzyme
unit (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol
reducing sugar per minute. The thermostability was determined by preincubating
the purified Chitinase Chi1 (1.6 μM) at pH 6.0 (0.1 M citrate-phosphate-borate
buffer) at various temperatures (40–60 °C) for different
time intervals up to 168 h. The influence of pH on activity of Chitinase
Chi1 was determined by incubating Chitinase Chi1 (1.6 μM) at
different pH levels (3.0–9.0) in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate-borate
buffer using swollen chitin as substrate.
Determination of Kinetic
Parameters
The Km, Vmax, and kcat values for swollen
chitin and chitosan 90 DDA/100
kDa were calculated with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software,
U.S.A.). The reducing sugars produced in the supernatant were measured
using the p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH)
assay.[35]
Depolymerization of Chitosans
with Different Mw and DDA
To elucidate the influence of Mw
and DDA of chitosans on Chitinase
Chi1 activity a wide range of different chitosans were tested including:
glycol chitosan, hydroxypropyl chitosan, oxidized chitosan, and chitosans
with different DDA and Mw. Chitosans were used in a concentration
of 0.1% (w/v) with 40.7 nM of purified Chitinase Chi1 in 1 mL of 0.05
M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0. The mixture was incubated at 50
°C while mixing at 800 rpm for 15 min. After incubation, the
enzyme activity was terminated by heating at 96 °C for 5 min.
The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 20 000g for 5 min. The reducing sugars produced in the supernatant were
measured using the p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide
(PAHBAH) assay.[35]
Hydrolysis of Swollen Chitin
and Chitosan
For the enzymatic
hydrolysis of swollen chitin and chitosan 90 DDA/100 the reaction
mixtures containing 1 mL of 0.45% (w/v) substrate in 0.05 M sodium
phosphate buffer pH 6.0 with 100 nM purified Chitinase Chi1 were incubated
at 50 °C while mixing at 800 rpm. Aliquots were taken at different
time intervals, and the hydrolysis products were analyzed by high-performance
anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) and MALDI-TOF-MS.
Hydrolysis
of Chitin Oligosaccharides and pNP-Substrates
Hydrolysis
of chitin oligosaccharides (GlcNAc)2–6 and pNP-substrates was followed in time. Incubations
were performed with 25 nM purified Chitinase Chi1 in 0.5 mL reaction
volume containing 2 mM substrate (GlcNAc)2–6, 1
mM (GlcNAc)2-pNP or (GlcNAc)3-pNP, and 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0.
Samples were incubated at 50 °C and aliquots of 60 μL were
taken at different time intervals. The reaction was terminated by
heating at 96 °C for 5 min, and the hydrolysis products were
analyzed by HPAEC.
HPAEC
An ICS-3000 ion chromatography
HPLC system equipped
with a CarboPac PA-1 column (2 × 250 mm) in combination with
a CarboPac PA-guard column (2 × 25 mm) at 22 °C and a pulsed
electrochemical detector (PAD) in pulsed amperometric detection mode
(Dionex) at 30 °C was used. A flow rate of 0.25 mL min–1 was used, and the column was equilibrated with water. The following
gradient was used: 0–25 min H2O, 25–65 min
at 0–0.045 M NaOH, 65–70 min at 0.045 M NaOH-1 M sodium
acetate in 0.1 M NaOH, 70–75 min at 1 M sodium acetate in 0.1
M NaOH, 75–75.1 min 1 M sodium acetate in 0.1 M NaOH-0.1 M
NaOH, 75.1–80 min 0.1 M NaOH, and 80–95 min H2O. Post column addition was used for increasing the PAD signal by
0.5 M NaOH at a flow rate of 0.15 mL min–1.
Identification
of Chitin and Chito-oligosaccharides by MALDI-TOF-MS
MALDI-TOF-MS
was performed on a Bruker UltraFlextreme (Bruker Daltonics)
in reflective mode, and positive ions were examined. The instrument
was calibrated for positive ions with a mixture of maltodextrin standards
with known molecular masses. Samples were diluted in the matrix solution
containing 10 mg mL–1 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid
in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile. For analysis, 1 μL of the mixture
was transferred to the target plate and dried under a stream of dry
air. The lowest laser intensity needed to obtain a good quality spectrum
was applied, and 10 times 50 laser shots randomly obtained from the
sample were accumulated.
Results
Sequence Analysis of Chitinase
Chi1
The putative gene chi1 encoding for
Chitinase Chi1 had an ORF of 1281-bp that
encoded a protein with 426 amino acids, in which a signal peptide
is predicted that consists of 23 amino acids in the N-terminal region
of the protein. The deduced molecular weight of Chitinase Chi1 was
43.8 kDa, and a theoretical pI was at pH 4.95. Four
potential O-linked glycosylation sites, one potential N-linked glycosylation site, and 47 phosphorylation sites were found
in the sequence. Multiple sequence alignment of the active site of
the deduced protein sequence of Chitinase Chi1 (Figure A) with Chitinase A from Serratia
marcescens (1NH6_A), Chitinase B from Arthrobacter sp. TAD20 (1KFW_A), Janthinobacterium lividum (AAA83223),
and Chitinase from Clostridium paraputrificum (BAD12045)
revealed the presence of the conserved glycoside GH 18 domain in Chitinase
Chi1. In total 10 conserved amino acids and one conserved active-site
motif consisting of aspartate (D) and glutamate (E) residues forming
the D-X-E motif were found in Chitinase Chi1. Modeling of the secondary
structure of Chitinase Chi1 revealed that Chitinase Chi1 is composed
of 16 α-helixes and 14 β-sheets (Figure B). 3D modeling of Chitinase Chi1 was based
on similarity with Chitinase from the fungus Clonostachys
rosea belonging to GH 18 (template PDB entry: 3G6MA; Figure C). Using this sequence 386
amino acids residues (equal to 96% of the whole amino acid sequence)
have been modeled with 100% confidence by the single highest scoring
template. This modeling revealed the (β/α)8 barrel fold (TIM) of Chitinase Chi1.
Figure 1
Sequence analysis of
Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora
thermophila C1. A. Multiple sequence alignment of active
site of Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1 with active site of Chitinase A from Serratia marcescens (1NH6_A), Chitinase B from Arthrobacter sp. TAD20
(1KFW_A), Janthinobacterium lividum (AAA83223), and
Chitinase from Clostridium paraputrificum (BAD12045).
Conserved residues are colored in yellow and marked with (#) sign.
Conserved D-X-E motif is shown in the green box. Chitinase Chi1 shares
10 amino acids with conserved hydrolases family 18 (GH 18) domain.
Analysis was performed with Conserved Domain Search and Conserved
Domain Database. B. Secondary structure of Chitinase Chi1 predicted
with Phyre2. C. 3D modeling of Chitinase Chi1 was performed with Phyre2
software with Chitinase from Clonostachys rosea belonging
to GH 18 family (PDB entry 3G6MA) used as template.
Sequence analysis of
Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora
thermophila C1. A. Multiple sequence alignment of active
site of Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1 with active site of Chitinase A from Serratia marcescens (1NH6_A), Chitinase B from Arthrobacter sp. TAD20
(1KFW_A), Janthinobacterium lividum (AAA83223), and
Chitinase from Clostridium paraputrificum (BAD12045).
Conserved residues are colored in yellow and marked with (#) sign.
Conserved D-X-E motif is shown in the green box. Chitinase Chi1 shares
10 amino acids with conserved hydrolases family 18 (GH 18) domain.
Analysis was performed with Conserved Domain Search and Conserved
Domain Database. B. Secondary structure of Chitinase Chi1 predicted
with Phyre2. C. 3D modeling of Chitinase Chi1 was performed with Phyre2
software with Chitinase from Clonostachys rosea belonging
to GH 18 family (PDB entry 3G6MA) used as template.
Purification of Chitinase Chi1
The gene chi1 encoding for Chitinase Chi1 was successfully cloned into the M. thermophila C1-expression host. The transformant with the highest production was used
for the production of high amounts of Chitinase Chi1, (7.5 g/L), in
2-L fermentation. From the culture broth, 15 g of protein containing
about 60% Chitinase Chi1 (based on SDS-PAGE, Figure A) was obtained. The crude enzyme preparation
was further subjected to a two-step purification process using anion
exchange and size exclusion chromatography. The first purification
step (Figure A) resulted
in the separation of the extract in two main protein peaks of which
the peak eluting first showed mainly N-acetylglucosaminidase
activity and the second peak chitinase activity. However, in the second
peak some N-acetylglucosaminidase activity was detected.
Therefore, in order to remove this activity, fraction I from the first
purification step was subjected to size exclusion chromatography using
a Superdex 75 (Figure B). This step enabled a clear separation between Chitinase Chi1 and
the remaining N-acetylglucosaminidase. Chitinase
Chi1 was successfully purified to homogeneity as shown on SDS-PAGE
as one single band (Figure A) and was confirmed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of the proteolytic
digest (Figure S1, Supporting Information) that identified only peptides originating from Chitinase Chi1.
Staining with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) did not detect any glycosylation
of Chitinase Chi1 (Figure B). The specific activity of the purified Chitinase Chi1 was
3.5 U mg–1 for colloidal chitin azure (Table ).
Figure 3
Analysis of purified Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora
thermophila C1. A. molecular weight of Chitinase Chi1 determined
by SDS-PAGE under reducing denaturing conditions. Lanes: M, standard
protein molecular weight markers; 1, crude enzyme preparation of Chitinase
Chi1; 2, purified Chitinase Chi1. B. Protein staining with periodic
acid (PAS). Lanes: M, standard protein molecular weight markers; 1,
purified Chitinase Chi1; 2, yeast invertase; 3, bovine serum albumin.
C. Isoelectric focusing (IEF). Lanes: M, pI marker;
1, purified Chitinase Chi1. D. Molecular weight of Chitinase Chi1
determined by MALDI-TOF-MS.
Figure 2
Purification of Chitinase
Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1 by ion exchange
chromatography on DEAE-FF Sepharose (A) and size
exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75 (B). Proteins (blue line)
were detected at 280 nm. Chitinase activity (green line) was measured
with chitin azure at pH 6.0 and 50 °C. Activity of N-acetylglucosaminidase (red line)was assayed with GlcNAc-pNP at pH 4.0 and 50 °C.
Table 1
Characterization of Chitinase-Containing
Fractions Obtained during Purification of Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1
purification step
volume (mL)
total
activity (U)
total protein (mg)
specific activity (U mg–1)a
crude extract
50
373
142
2.6
anion exchange
chromatography fraction I
10
126
51
2.5
size exclusion chromatography fraction II
2.5
23
6.6
3.5
Specific activity
was assayed with
5% (w/v) colloidal chitin azure at 50 °C and pH 7.0 and was calculated
per mg protein.
Purification of Chitinase
Chi1 from Myceliophthora thermophila C1 by ion exchange
chromatography on DEAE-FFSepharose (A) and size
exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75 (B). Proteins (blue line)
were detected at 280 nm. Chitinase activity (green line) was measured
with chitin azure at pH 6.0 and 50 °C. Activity of N-acetylglucosaminidase (red line)was assayed with GlcNAc-pNP at pH 4.0 and 50 °C.Analysis of purified Chitinase Chi1 from Myceliophthora
thermophila C1. A. molecular weight of Chitinase Chi1 determined
by SDS-PAGE under reducing denaturing conditions. Lanes: M, standard
protein molecular weight markers; 1, crude enzyme preparation of Chitinase
Chi1; 2, purified Chitinase Chi1. B. Protein staining with periodic
acid (PAS). Lanes: M, standard protein molecular weight markers; 1,
purified Chitinase Chi1; 2, yeast invertase; 3, bovine serum albumin.
C. Isoelectric focusing (IEF). Lanes: M, pI marker;
1, purified Chitinase Chi1. D. Molecular weight of Chitinase Chi1
determined by MALDI-TOF-MS.Specific activity
was assayed with
5% (w/v) colloidal chitin azure at 50 °C and pH 7.0 and was calculated
per mg protein.
Molecular Weight
and Isoelectric Point of Chitinase Chi1
Chitinase Chi1 is
a monomeric polypeptide, and the molecular weight
predicted from the protein sequence is 43.8 kDa. The molecular weight
of the purified Chitinase Chi1 was measured by MALDI-TOF-MS and was
shown to be 42.9 kDa (Figure D). The MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum of Chitinase Chi1 showed an
intense signal of the single charged protein [M + H]+ at
m/z 42 882 and the signal of the double-charged
protein [M+2H]2+ at m/z 21 370.
The SDS-PAGE revealed a molecular weight of 43 kDa (Figure A). The isoelectric point of
Chitinase Chi1 was found to be 3.95 (Figure C).
Influence of pH and Temperature on Activity
and Stability of
Chitinase Chi1
Chitinase Chi1 was active at pH 3.0 to 9.0
(Figure A) and exhibited
the highest activity at pH 6.0. Chitinase Chi1 showed activity from
30 to 70 °C with the highest activity at 55 °C (Figure B), and it was remarkably
stable at 40 °C (>140 h 90% activity) and 50 °C (>168
h
90% activity; Figure C). At 55 °C the enzyme reached its half-life after 48 h. Incubation
at 60 °C resulted in fast inactivation of the enzyme, with a
loss of 90% of the initial catalytic activity after 1 h incubation.
Figure 4
Enzyme
characteristics of Chitinase Chi1: A. Enzyme activities
at various pH (pH 3.0–9.0) were measured at 50 °C in 0.1
M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer. B. Enzyme activities at various
temperatures (30–80 °C) were measured at pH 6.0 in 0.1
M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer. C. Thermostability was measured
by incubating Chitinase Chi1 at various temperatures (40–60
°C), and the residual activities were assayed at 50 °C.
Reactions were performed with 1.6 μM purified Chitinase Chi1
and 1% (w/v) swollen chitin in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer
for 30 min. The error bars represent the range of duplicate experiments.
Enzyme
characteristics of Chitinase Chi1: A. Enzyme activities
at various pH (pH 3.0–9.0) were measured at 50 °C in 0.1
M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer. B. Enzyme activities at various
temperatures (30–80 °C) were measured at pH 6.0 in 0.1
M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer. C. Thermostability was measured
by incubating Chitinase Chi1 at various temperatures (40–60
°C), and the residual activities were assayed at 50 °C.
Reactions were performed with 1.6 μM purified Chitinase Chi1
and 1% (w/v) swollen chitin in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate-borate buffer
for 30 min. The error bars represent the range of duplicate experiments.
Kinetic Parameters for
Chitinase Chi1
Kinetic parameters
of Chitinase Chi1 were determined for swollen chitin and for chitosan
90 DDA/100. Activities were determined based on reducing sugars released
during the reaction.For swollen chitin the specific activity
was 1.4 ± 0.2 U mg–1, Vmax was 12.2 ± 0.5 μM min–1, Km was 2.0 ± 0.2 mg mL–1, and kcat was 0.11 ± 0.0 s–1.For chitosan the specific activity was 10.0
± 0.6 U mg–1, Vmax was 194 ±
21.4 μM min–1, Km was 0.9 ± 0.3 mg mL–1, and kcat was 1.9 ± 0.2 s–1.
Influence of
Molecular Weight and Degree of Deacetylation of
Chitosan on Chitinase Chi1 Activity
To evaluate the influence
of the Mw (100, 600, and 3000 kDa) and DDA (77, 78, 88, 90, and 94)
of chitosan on Chitinase Chi1 activity, a range of chitosans was tested
(Figure ). In case
of chitosans with the same Mw (600 kDa), Chitinase Chi1 showed decreased
activity when DDA was increased. The highest activity was measured
for chitosan with the lowest Mw (chitosan 90 DDA/100). For chitosan
with similar DDA but different Mw (chitosan 88 DDA/3000 and chitosan
90 DDA/100), Chitinase Chi1 showed higher activity for lower Mw chitosan.
Chitinase Chi1 degraded partially oxidized chitosan (i.e., chitosan
with random oxidation at C6 positions) but showed 10% of activity
as measured for the untreated parent chitosan (chitosan 90 DDA/100).
Chitinase Chi1 was not able to degrade glycol chitosan and hydroxypropyl-chitosan,
which are both fully deacetylated.
Figure 5
Specific activity of Chitinase Chi1 on
different types of chitosans.
Chitosans were used in a concentration of 0.1% (w/v) with 40.7 nM
of purified Chitinase Chi1 in 1 mL of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer
pH 6.0. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 50 °C, for 15
min. The reducing sugars produced in the supernatant were measured
using the p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH)
assay. The results represent the average of duplicate experiments.
Specific activity of Chitinase Chi1 on
different types of chitosans.
Chitosans were used in a concentration of 0.1% (w/v) with 40.7 nM
of purified Chitinase Chi1 in 1 mL of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer
pH 6.0. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 50 °C, for 15
min. The reducing sugars produced in the supernatant were measured
using the p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH)
assay. The results represent the average of duplicate experiments.
Degradation of Chitin and
Chitosan by Chitinase Chi1
Degradation of chitin incubated
with Chitinase Chi1 was followed
in time, and products released were analyzed by HPAEC. The main products
formed were (GlcNAc)2 next to a small amount of (GlcNAc)3 and GlcNAc (Figure ). After the first 30 min the rate of (GlcNAc)2 release gradually decreased in time. The concentration of (GlcNAc)3 and GlcNAc increased gradually up to 30 min of incubation
and leveled off hereafter. At 90 min incubation the concentration
of (GlcNAc)3 started to decrease, when degradation into
(GlcNAc)2 and GlcNAc became the predominant reaction. The
ratio (GlcNAc)2 to GlcNAc at the end of the reaction was
equal to 11. Chitin conversion expressed as the amount of (GlcNAc)2 produced was 3.1% after 6 h.
Figure 6
Release of chitin oligosaccharides during
swollen chitin hydrolysis
by Chitinase Chi1. Swollen chitin (0.45% (w/v)) was incubated with
purified Chitinase Chi1 (100 nM) at 50 °C in 1 mL of 0.05 M sodium
phosphate buffer pH 6.0. Aliquots were taken at different time intervals,
and the hydrolysis products were analyzed by HPAEC. Detected products
were GlcNAc (cross), (GlcNAc)2 (triangle), and (GlcNAc)3 (square). Soft lines are only drawn as visual aids. The error
bars represent the range of duplicate experiments.
Release of chitin oligosaccharides during
swollen chitin hydrolysis
by Chitinase Chi1. Swollen chitin (0.45% (w/v)) was incubated with
purified Chitinase Chi1 (100 nM) at 50 °C in 1 mL of 0.05 M sodium
phosphate buffer pH 6.0. Aliquots were taken at different time intervals,
and the hydrolysis products were analyzed by HPAEC. Detected products
were GlcNAc (cross), (GlcNAc)2 (triangle), and (GlcNAc)3 (square). Soft lines are only drawn as visual aids. The error
bars represent the range of duplicate experiments.Products released from chitosan 90 DDA/100 were
analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS.
Chito-oligosaccharides were detected as potassium and/or sodium adducts
and are summarized in Table S1 (Supporting Information). Chitinase Chi1 was able to release a whole spectrum of hetero-oligosaccharides
consisting of GlcNAc and GlcN units with a polymerization degree (DP)
ranging from 2 to 12. The chito-oligosaccharide composition of the
reaction mixture changed over time (Figure S2, Supporting Information). At the early stages of the reaction,
a large diversity of chito-oligosaccharides were formed, containing
2–6 GlcNAc units and 1–9 GlcN residues in different
combinations and with a ratio GlcNAc/GlcN spanning the range between
0.5 and 4 (Table 1S and Figure S2, Supporting Information). During the reaction, chito-oligosaccharides with
more than three GlcNAc residues might be further degraded by Chitinase
Chi1, and new GlcN-enriched chito-oligosaccharides containing up to
10 GlcN residues and one or two GlcNAc residues are formed that accumulate
in time (Table 1S and Figure S3, Supporting Information). Fully acetylated DP 2 ((GlcNAc)2, 447.2 m/z [M + Na]+) was identified from the early stages of the
reaction and during the entire incubation. Fully acetylated DP 3 (650.3
m/z [M + Na]+) was detected only at 15
min incubation time, indicating that it was subsequently degraded
by the enzyme. Accumulation of the heterologous dimer (DP 2) composed
of GlcNAc and GlcN (405.2 m/z [M + Na]+) at longer reaction times, in the slow phase of the reaction, may
indicate the ability of Chitinase Chi1 to cleave glycosidic linkages
between GlcN and GlcNAc moieties in the chitosan chain but only when
GlcNAc is positioned in −1 subsite of the enzyme active site.
Degradation of Chitin Oligosaccharides and pNP-Substrates by
Chitinase Chi1
In order to study the binding preferences
and to determine the shortest possible substrate for Chitinase Chi1
the hydrolysis of chito-oligosaccharides(GlcNAc)2–6 was followed in time and the hydrolysis products were analyzed by
HPAEC (Figure ). (GlcNAc)2 was not hydrolyzed by Chitinase Chi1 (data not shown), whereas
(GlcNAc)3 was cleaved to (GlcNAc)2 and GlcNAc
(Figure A). (GlcNAc)4 was split only to (GlcNAc)2 (Figure B). (GlcNAc)5 was
degraded to (GlcNAc)2 and (GlcNAc)3; however,
after 25 h (GlcNAc)3 was degraded to GlcNAc and (GlcNAc)2 (Figure C).
Depolymerization of (GlcNAc)6 resulted in the initial release
of (GlcNAc)4 and (GlcNAc)2 and small amounts
of (GlcNAc)3 (Figure D). The released (GlcNAc)4 was further degraded
to (GlcNAc)2, and (GlcNAc)3 was cleaved to (GlcNAc)2 and GlcNAc. The calculated rates for the degradation of chitinoligosaccharides were 0.18 mM min–1 for (GlcNAc)6, 0.17 mM min–1 for (GlcNAc)5, 0.20 mM min–1 for (GlcNAc)4, and 0.02
mM min–1 for (GlcNAc)3.
Figure 7
Hydrolysis of chitin
oligosaccharides (GlcNAc)3 (A),
(GlcNAc)4 (B), (GlcNAc)5 (C), and (GlcNAc)6 (D) by Chitinase Chi1. Chitin oligosaccharides (2 mM) in
0.5 mL of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0 were incubated with
purified Chitinase Chi1 (25 nM). Aliquots were taken at different
time intervals, and the hydrolysis products were analyzed by HPAEC.
Detected products were GlcNAc (star), (GlcNAc)2 (triangle),
(GlcNAc)3 (square), (GlcNAc)4 (circle), (GlcNAc)5 (cross), and (GlcNAc)6 (diamond). Experimental
work performed in duplicates and the standard deviation was less than
5%.
Hydrolysis of chitinoligosaccharides(GlcNAc)3 (A),
(GlcNAc)4 (B), (GlcNAc)5 (C), and (GlcNAc)6 (D) by Chitinase Chi1. Chitin oligosaccharides (2 mM) in
0.5 mL of 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0 were incubated with
purified Chitinase Chi1 (25 nM). Aliquots were taken at different
time intervals, and the hydrolysis products were analyzed by HPAEC.
Detected products were GlcNAc (star), (GlcNAc)2 (triangle),
(GlcNAc)3 (square), (GlcNAc)4 (circle), (GlcNAc)5 (cross), and (GlcNAc)6 (diamond). Experimental
work performed in duplicates and the standard deviation was less than
5%.Among pNP-labeled
chitin oligosaccharides, activity
of Chitinase Chi1 was detected for (GlcNAc)3-pNP and (GlcNAc)2-pNP with the highest
specific activity for (GlcNAc)2-pNP (Figure
S3A, Supporting Information). No activity
was found for GlcNAc-pNP, which is in agreement that
no activity was detected for (GlcNAc)2.To investigate
the reaction mechanism in more detail, degradation
of labeled chitin oligosaccharides (GlcNAc)3-pNP and (GlcNAc)2-pNP was followed in
time by HPAEC (Figure S3B, Supporting Information). Hydrolysis of (GlcNAc)3-pNP yielded
predominantly GlcNAc-pNP and (GlcNAc)2 (about 90% end product) and low amounts of (GlcNAc)3 (about
10% end product). In time the released (GlcNAc)3 was degraded
further to (GlcNAc)2 and GlcNAc. Products detected from
the hydrolysis of (GlcNAc)2-pNP were (GlcNAc)2, GlcNAc-pNP, and small amounts of (GlcNAc)3 (Figure S4B, Supporting Information). The substrate used in this experiment did not contain (GlcNAc)3 (Figure S4C, Supporting Information). Production of (GlcNAc)3 can be explained by the transglycosylation
reaction catalyzed by Chitinase Chi1, and it is in agreement with
results reported for Chitinase MBP-CfcA from Aspergillus niger.[36]
Discussion
Analysis
of the amino acid sequence of Chitinase Chi1 confirmed
that Chitinase Chi1 is a real glycoside hydrolase from GH 18 family,
which contains characteristic for this family D-X-E motif. The 3D
modeled structure revealed that Chitinase Chi1 has (β/α)8 barrel fold (TIM) which is another characteristic for chitinases
from GH 18.Chitinase Chi1 was purified to homogeneity as confirmed
by MALDI-TOF-MS
and HPLC-MS/MS analysis of the proteolytic digests of the purified
enzyme. The increase in specific activity after each purification
step was not very extensive, and this might be due to the additive
activity of the accompanying N-acetylglucosaminidase
that was detected in the crude enzyme extract and which was still
present in the fractions obtained after the first purification step
using anion exchange chromatography. The ability of N-acetylglucosaminidase to act on the amorphous parts of chitin was
reported for β-N-acetylhexosaminidase (LeHex20A)
by Konno and co-workers.[37] The second step
of purification on size exclusion chromatography enabled a clear separation
between Chitinase Chi1 and the remaining N-acetylglucosaminidase,
resulting in the isolation of a pure enzyme.Molecular weight
of Chitinase Chi1 measured with MALDI-TOF-MS was
43 kDa, which was different from a molecular weight calculated from
the deduced protein sequence of 43.8 kDa. This difference shows that
full-length Chitinase Chi1 undergoes post-translational proteolytic
modification in the host M. thermophila C1. Detection
of peptides from C-terminus end of Chitinase Chi1 with HPLC-MS/MS
indicates that proteolytic removal takes place from the N-terminus
end of Chitinase Chi1. According to the calculated molecular weight,
approximately 9 amino acids might be removed. Proteolytic processing
has been previously described for chitinases from other microorganisms
including Chitinase ChiC from Serratia marcescens(38) and chitinases from Streptomyces
olivaceoviridis(39) and Janthinobacterium lividum.[40] Recently,
Dua et al.[25] reported the exochitinase
rMtChit obtained by heterologous expression of the same gene sequence
obtained from M. thermophila BJA
in Pichia pastoris. This latter protein has a molecular
weight of 48 kDa. The difference in molecular weight between Chitinase
Chi1 and rMtChit can be explained by the fact that different cloning
approaches and different hosts were used for enzyme production; that
is, Chitinase Chi1 was expressed homologously in M. thermophila, while exochitinase rMtChit was expressed heterologously in the
yeastP. pastoris. Furthermore,
Chitinase Chi1 and exochitinase rMtChit differ clearly in the extent
of glycosylation. Staining with PAS confirmed that Chitinase Chi1
was not or hardly glycosylated because no magenta color formation
was detected for Chitinase Chi1 at a concentration of 1 mg mL–1. In contrast, exochitinase rMtChit gave an intense
magenta color, indicating glycosylation, as reported by Dua et al.[25]Chitinase Chi1 was found to have a pH
optimum at pH 6.0 and a pI of 3.98, while the calculated
pI from
the amino acid sequence was 4.95. This difference between the theoretical
pI predicted from the primary structure and the experimentally
determined pI is common, since the pI of proteins is affected by several factors, including the solvent
accessibility of amino acids. Some charged amino acids could be shielded
by the folded structure of the enzyme and may not be exposed to the
solvent, changing therefore the observed pI.The highest activity of Chitinase Chi1 was detected at 55 °C
which is in agreement with other thermophilic chitinases (Table ). Chitinase Chi1
showed excellent thermostability at 50 °C (>168 h, 90% activity)
and at 55 °C (t1/2 = 48 h). Reported
thermostable fungal chitinases have also thermostability up to 50
°C, but all are less stable in time than Chitinase Chi1 (Table ). For example, the
exochitinase rMtChit retained only 70% of its activity when exposed
to 45 °C for 5 h and showed a t1/2 = 113 min at 65 °C. During incubation at 50 °C (1 h) Chitinase
from T. lanuginosus retained 71%
of its activity, whereas other Chitinase from T. lanuginosus was able to preserve about 70% of the enzyme
activity after 6 h at 50 °C. In contrast, another Chitinase from T. lanuginosusSY2 was 100% active for
1 h when incubating at 50 °C. Therefore, it can be concluded
that Chitinase Chi1 can be classified as thermostable chitinase which
shows excellent thermostability among other chitinases from thermophilic
fungi.
Table 2
Properties of Chitinases from Thermophilic
Fungi
organism
molecular weight
(kDa)
pH optimum
temp. optimum (°C)
temp. range (°C)
thermostability
(as % activity retained activity)
ref
Aspergillus
fumigatus YJ-407
46
5
50–60
45–60
100% activity
after 1 h at 45 °C
(14)
∼70% activity after 1 h at 55 °C
∼20% activity
after 1 h at 60 °C
Chaetomium thermophilum
47
5.5
60
40–70
100% activity after 1 h at 50 °C
(15)
∼90% activity after 1 h
at 60 °C
Gliocladium catenulatum
51
5.0–6.0
60
20–70
40% activity after 20 min at 50 °C
(16)
Rhizopus oryzae
5.5–6.0
60
50–70
100% activity after 30 min at 50 °C
(17)
∼40% activity after 30
min at 60 °C
Myceliophthora thermophila BJA
48
5.0
55
30–70
70% activity after 5h at 45 °C
(25)
∼50% activity after 113
min at 65 °C
∼50% activity after 48 min 75 °C
Thermoascus aurantiacus
vs levisporus
48
8.0
50
40–60
∼90% activity after 1 h at 50 °C
(15)
≈30% activity after 1 h
at 60 °C
Thermomyces lanuginosus
44.1
5.0
50
30–60
50% activity at 50 °C after 630 min
(18)
56% activity at 60 °C after 30 min
Thermomyces lanuginosus
36.6
4.0
40
30–60
50% activity at 40 °C after 577.5 min
(18)
71% activity at 50 °C after 60 min
Thermomyces lanuginosus
SY2
48
55
55
50–60
100% activity after 1
h at 50 °C
(19)
∼80% activity after 1 h at 60 °C
Thermomyces
lanuginosus
42
60
60
30–70
70% activity after 6 h at 50 °C
(20)
Trichoderma viride
28
3.5
55–60
∼30% activity after 3 h
at 50 °C
(22)
∼10% activity after 3 h at 60 °C
Myceliophthora thermophila C1
43
6.0
55
30–70
∼90% activity after >168 h at 50 °C
this work
50% activity after 48 h at 55 °C
10% activity after 10 min at 60 °C
Besides activity on chitin, Chitinase Chi1 showed
also activity
on the deacetylated chitin derivative, chitosan. Solubilized chitosan
was more efficiently degraded by the enzyme than swollen chitin. This
is in agreement with previous studies reporting that chitinases from
GH 18 are able to cleave the glycosidic linkage of not only GlcNAc–GlcNAc
but also GlcNAc–GlcN present in chitosan as long as a GlcNAc
residue is bound at the −1 subsite.[42] Furthermore, higher activity on chitosan than on chitin indicates
that substrate accessibility is an important parameter influencing
chitinase activity as it was also observed for bacterial chitinase
from Ralstonia sp.(41)The activity of Chitinase Chi1 was strongly affected by DDA, Mw,
and presence of side groups (i.e., aldehyde and carboxyl) at the chitosan
chain. In general, chitosan with a lower DDA (77 DDA) was degraded
more efficiently than chitosan with high DDA (94 DDA). This result
confirmed that Chitinase Chi1 is a real GH 18 enzyme, which is dependent
on the acetyl group of GlcNAc for catalysis. Thus, a decrease in the
number of GlcNAc moieties present in the chitosan chain will result
in less productive binding sites of Chitinase Chi1. Chitosan with
low Mw (100 kDa) was degraded more efficiently than chitosan with
high Mw (3000 kDa) and the same DDA. This result denotes, that chitosan
with higher Mw, which also shows higher viscosity, is less accessible
for the enzyme than the chitosan with a low Mw. Fully deacetylated
modified chitosans with pending aliphatic side groups, such as glycolchitosan and hydroxypropyl-chitosan, were not degraded at all by the
enzyme, showing that Chitinase Chi1 is a real chitinase, which is
not able to cleave GlcN–GlcN bonds. Although steric hindrance
due to side chains cannot be excluded, the results clearly suggest
that the Chitinase Chi1 activity depends on the presence and the number
of acetyl groups. It was shown for enzymes from GH 18 that the carbonyl
oxygen from GlcNAc moiety act as a nucleophile during catalytic reaction
of GH 18 enzymes. Similar activity on chitosan was reported for Chitinase
from Streptomyces griseus.[42]Chitinase Chi1 released mainly (GlcNAc)2 from chitin.
Release of dimers was reported for other chitinases from GH 18 family.[7,43] In contrast, exochitinase rMtChit released only monomers from chitin.[25] Although the amino acid sequence of Chitinase
Chi1 and exochitinase rMtChit should be the same, differences in expression
host and glycosylation influence the activity and mode of action of
Chitinase Chi1 and exochitinase rMtChit.Next to (GlcNAc)2, Chitinase Chi1 released a small amount
of GlcNAc and (GlcNAc)3, with a ratio of (GlcNAc)2/GlcNAc equal to 11. This ratio is commonly used for a rough assessment
of enzyme processivity.[44,45] Thus, Chitinase Chi1
may be considered as a processive chitinase. A decrease in the rate
of chitin hydrolysis, which was observed after 30 min reaction is
most likely due to the fact that Chitinase Chi1 enriched the recalcitrant
regions of the substrate. It was previously stated that the activity
of processive enzymes tends to decrease as the substrate is consumed
and when the enzymes reach regions that hinder processive binding.[45]The release of (GlcNAc)2 in
higher molar amount than
other chitin oligosaccharides from chitin was observed for processive
and nonprocessive enzymes degrading recalcitrant polysaccharides,
like for processive chitinases ChiA and ChiB and nonprocessive ChiC
from S. marcescens.[43] Therefore,
results obtained for Chitinase Chi1 with natural substrates indicate
its processivity, but this conclusion is not indisputable. An important
feature of processive exoacting chitinases is the so-called α
+ β insertion domain that forms one “wall” of
the substrate binding cleft, which were found in ChiA and ChiB.[46,9] This domain was not found in Chitinase Chi1. However, the active
site of Chitinase Chi1 is aligned with 60 amino acid residues, which
may be important for interactions with the substrate and promote processivity
of the enzyme. Aromatic residues in the active site of processive
enzymes were shown to interact with the substrate during the processive
mode of action.[45]Processivity has
been studied for other chitinases and also for
cellulases.[47] It was shown that processive
enzymes slide with their active site on the single-polymer chain and
stay closely associated with the substrate between subsequent hydrolytic
reactions. During the processive degradation of chitin the enzymes
release mainly dimers because the successive sugar units in the polymer
are rotated by 180° and sliding of such polymers through the
enzyme’s active site will result in the productive binding
only after every second sugar moiety. Rotation of the sugar units
is particularly important for chitinases from family GH 18, since
these enzymes require a correctly positioned N-acetyl
group in their −1 subsite.[43]It may be concluded that Chitinase Chi1 is an endochitinase with
a high degree of processivity. It was stated that both endo- and exomechanisms
can be combined with processive action[46] and that the most important difference between chitinases may be
related to the ability of the enzymes to act in processive or nonprocessive
ways, rather than to their binding preferences (endo- or exomanner).[9]Chitinase Chi1 was able to release a broad
spectrum of chitin-
and chito-oligosaccharides (DP2-DP12) from chitosan with 90% DDA.
The chito-oligosaccharide composition of the reaction mixture changed
over time, indicating that release and further degradation of some
chito-oligosaccharides might be simultaneously catalyzed by Chitinase
Chi1, as it was shown in the experiment with chitin oligosaccharides(GlcNAc)2–6. The composition of chito-oligosaccharides
and the accumulation of a (GlcNAc, GlcN) dimer at longer reaction
time may indicate the ability of Chitinase Chi1 to cleave glycosidic
linkages between GlcN and GlcNAc moieties in the chitosan chain, as
it was reported for the Chitinase G from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) from bacterial family GH19 Chitinase[48] and other bacterial chitinases.[49] Release
of longer chito-oligosaccharides may indicate that, similarly to chitin
degradation, Chitinase Chi1 can degrade chitosan in a processive way.
Chitinases ChiA and ChiB from S. marcescens(50) were shown to degrade chitosan in a processive
way. In the case of chitosan, processive enzymes stay attached to
the substrate after productive (with a correctly positioned N-acetyl group in the sugar unit) or nonproductive (with
lack of a correctly positioned N-acetyl group in
the sugar unit) initial binding to the substrate. Binding of the substrate
will be followed by sliding of the substrate through the active site
cleft by two sugar units at the time, until a new productive complex
will be formed and an enzymatic reaction occurs.[43]Chitinase Chi1 degraded chitin oligosaccharides with
DP ≥
3. The absence of activity on (GlcNAc)2 ruled out the possibility
that Chitinase Chi1 is an N-acetylglucosaminidase.
All initial released chitin oligosaccharides with DP ≥ 3 were
subject to further hydrolysis that yielded (GlcNAc)2 and
GlcNAc as final products. Chitinase Chi1 showed increasing activities
with increasing DP of chitin oligosaccharides. These data indicate
that Chitinase Chi1 has a multisubsite binding cleft and positioning
of chitin oligosaccharides with DP ≥ 4 is more efficient than
with DP 3, resulting in about 10 times faster conversion for longer-chain
chitin oligosaccharides than for shorter ones. Additionally, experiments
conducted with pNP-(GlcNAc)3 and pNP-(GlcNAc)2 confirmed that oligosaccharides
bind to Chitinase Chi1 at subsites −2 to +2 in the active site
during hydrolysis.Overall, we showed here that homologous expressed
Chitinase Chi1
releases mainly dimers from chitin and might use a processive mechanism.
Depolymerization of chitosan resulted in the production of a wide
range of chito-oligosaccharides. Chitin and chito-oligosaccharides
are an emerging class of bioactive ingredients with potential biomedical,
cosmetic, and pharmaceutic applications. The need for green and biocompatible
technologies for the production of chitin and chito-oligosaccharides
reveals new perspectives for the application of biocatalysts. With
its remarkable thermostability and activity in a wide range of pH,
Chitinase Chi1 is a promising biocatalyst for bioconversion of chitin
waste sources and production of chitin and chito-oligosaccharides
from both chitin and chitosan at industrial scale.
Authors: Jolanda M van Munster; Justyna M Dobruchowska; Ruud Veloo; Lubbert Dijkhuizen; Marc J E C van der Maarel Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lawrence A Kelley; Stefans Mezulis; Christopher M Yates; Mark N Wass; Michael J E Sternberg Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Kelly Dwyer; Ian S Bentley; Emma Tighe; Eibhilin McGleenan; Darragh Gaffney; Gary Walsh Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Malgorzata Krolicka; Sandra W A Hinz; Martijn J Koetsier; Gerrit Eggink; Lambertus A M van den Broek; Carmen G Boeriu Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hamada El-Gendi; Ahmed K Saleh; Raied Badierah; Elrashdy M Redwan; Yousra A El-Maradny; Esmail M El-Fakharany Journal: J Fungi (Basel) Date: 2021-12-28