| Literature DB >> 29358964 |
Tzu-Lin Yeh1, Hsin-Hao Chen1, Tsung-Ping Pai2, Shu-Jung Liu3, Shang-Liang Wu4, Fang-Ju Sun5, Lee-Ching Hwang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of auricular acupoint stimulation on overweight and obese adults.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29358964 PMCID: PMC5735786 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3080547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flowchart of the trial selection process.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study (year) | Country | Population | Modified Jadad score | Sample size | Characteristics of participants (gender, age) | Intervention group treatment | Control group treatment | Frequency/treatment course | Main outcome | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison et al. (1995) [ | USA | Obese adults | 5 | 96 | 16 M/80 F | AA device (Acu-Stop 2000) on dominant ear, massaged, 4 times a day | Subjects received wrist acupressure device in dominant side massaged, 4 times a day | Every 2 wks/12 wks | (1) BW, BF, BFM | 3 bleeding ears in treatment group |
|
| ||||||||||
| Shafshak (1995) [ | Egypt | Obese female adults | 3 | 30 | 0 M/30 F | Stainless needle AA with ES to AP1 or AP2. | Stainless needle AA with ES to sham AP on ear | Every day/3 wks | BW | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Richards and Marley (1998) [ | Australia | Overweight adults | 7 | 60 | NR | ES with AcuSlim device to AP | ES with AcuSlim device to thumb (without AP) | Twice daily/4 wks | (1) BW | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hsu et al. (2009) [ | Taiwan | Obese female adults | 7.5 | 45 | 0 M/45 F | Stainless steel needle (0.2 cm needle point) to AP; no apply any pressure to AP | Sham AA using placebo needles (without needle point) | Twice a wk/6 wks | (1) BW, BMI, WC, HC | 1 mild inflammation; 9 mild tenderness cases |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hsieh (2010) [ | Taiwan | Overweight adolescents | 4 | 84 | 8 M/76 F | Auricular acupressure to Japanese Magnetic Pearl or | Acupressure tape (0.5 | NR/8 wks | (1) BMI | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hsieh et al. (2011) [ | China | Overweight adults | 3 | 200 | NR |
| Needle AA on sham AP on the body | Every two days/12 wks | (1) BW, BMI, BF | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hsieh et al. (2011) [ | Taiwan | Young adults with abdominal obesity | 4 | 55 | 5 M/50 F | Acupressure with Japanese Magnetic Pearl on AP | Adhesive tape to AP | NR/8 wks | BW, WC | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Abdi et al. (2012) [ | Iran | Overweight adults | 4 | 169 | NR | Ear pressing plaster with seed to AP | Ear pressing plaster without seed to sham AP | Twice a wk/12 wks | (1) BW | No adverse effect |
|
| ||||||||||
| Ching et al. (2012) [ | Taiwan | Overweight schizophrenia patients | 7.5 | 72 | 33 M/39 F |
| Surgical tape to AP. AP points were not pressed | Twice a wk/8 wks | BW, BMI, BF | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Darbandi et al. (2012) [ | Iran | Overweight adults | 6 | 86 | 12 M/74 F |
| Ear plaster without seeds to AP | Twice a wk/6 wks | (1) BW, BMI, BFM | No adverse effect |
|
| ||||||||||
| He et al. (2012) [ | China | Obese female adults | 4.5 | 60 | 0 M/60 F |
| No AA | Every three days/4 wks | BW, BMI, WC | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Lien et al. (2012) [ | Taiwan | Obese female adults | 7.5 | 71 | 0 M/71 F | Apply stainless needles with a 0.2 cm tip or magnetic metal beads to AP | Sham AA to AP with auricular needle with tips removed (needle without needle points) | Three times a wk/4 wks | (1) BW, BMI, WC, HC, WHR | 1 account of dizziness after AA |
|
| ||||||||||
| Darbandi et al. (2014) [ | Iran | Obese male adults | 7.5 | 40 | 40 M |
| Sham AA with plasters to AP on both ears for 3 days. | Twice a wk/6 wks | BW, BMI, BFM, HC | No adverse effect |
|
| ||||||||||
| Kim et al. (2014) [ | South Korea | Obese female young adults | 5 | 49 | 0 M/49 F | Three | NO AA | Weekly/4 wks | (1) BW | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Schukro et al. (2014) [ | Austria | Obese female individuals | 7 | 42 | 0 M/42 F | ES with a P-Stim device | P-Stim® dummy (no power supply) | Weekly/6 wks | BW | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Yeo et al. (2014) [ | South Korea | Overweight adults | 6.5 | 58 | 6 M/52 F | Acupuncture needle on AP1 or AP2 | Sham AA, removed immediately after insertion; AP: CO1, CO4, CO6, CO18, HX1 | Weekly/8 wks | (1) BW | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Yeh et al. (2015) [ | Taiwan | Obese adults | 7.5 | 70 | 35 M/35 F | ES to AP and then apply pressure to each AP with | ES to sham AP. Apply pressure to each AP with | Weekly/10 wks | (1) BMI | NR |
|
| ||||||||||
| Hsu (2016) [ | China | Overweight adults | 3 | 120 | 73 M/47 F |
| Needle AA to sham AP on body | Every 2 days/12 wks | (1) BW, BMI, BF | NR |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05 between treatment and control groups; AA: auricular acupuncture; anti-HSP: anti-heat shock protein; AP: auricular acupoint; BF: body fat percentage; BFM: body fat mass; BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; BW: body weight; ES: electrical stimulation; F: female; FBG: fasting blood glucose; FINS: fasting insulin; HC: hip circumference; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HR: heart rate; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; M: male; min: minutes; NR: not reported; sec: second; TCH: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; WC: waist circumference; WHR: waist-to-hip ratio; wk: week; acupoints: ankle (AH3), hip (AH5), mouth (CO1), esophagus (CO2), stomach (CO4), small intestine (CO6), large intestine (CO7), spleen (CO13), San Jiao (CO17), endocrine (CO18), hunger point (HG), center of ear (HX1), elbow (SF3), shoulder (SF4), clavicle (SF6), Shen Men (TF4).
The effect of auricular acupoint stimulation on anthropometric measurements.
| Outcome | Intervention | Studies, | Participants | MD (95% CI) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW | Overall auricular stimulation | 13 | 830 | −1.21 (−1.94, −0.47) | 0.001 | 88% |
| <6 weeks' treatment | 4 | 165 | −1.58 (−2.82, −0.33) | 0.01 | 95% | |
| ≧6 weeks' treatment | 9 | 665 | −0.92 (−1.63, −0.22) | 0.01 | 59% | |
|
| ||||||
| BMI | Overall auricular stimulation | 12 | 718 | −0.57 (−0.82, −0.33) | <0.001 | 78% |
| <6 weeks' treatment | 4 | 165 | −0.48 (−0.92, −0.04) | 0.03 | 92% | |
| ≧6 weeks' treatment | 8 | 553 | −0.65 (−0.95, −0.34) | <0.001 | 52% | |
|
| ||||||
| BF | Overall auricular stimulation | 5 | 363 | −0.83 (−1.43, −0.24) | 0.006 | 0% |
|
| ||||||
| WC | Overall auricular stimulation | 10 | 608 | −1.75 (−2.95, −0.55) | 0.004 | 87% |
| <6 weeks' treatment | 4 | 165 | −0.51 (−0.92, −0.10) | 0.01 | 0% | |
| ≧6 weeks' treatment | 6 | 443 | −2.19 (−3.83, −0.54) | 0.009 | 83% | |
|
| ||||||
| HC | Overall auricular stimulation | 5 | 348 | −1.89 (−4.57, 0.79) | 0.17 | 94% |
| <6 weeks' treatment | 2 | 92 | 0.46 (−.0.94, 1.87) | 0.52 | 0% | |
| ≧6 weeks' treatment | 3 | 256 | −3.41 (−6.03, −0.78) | 0.01 | 91% | |
|
| ||||||
| WHR | Overall auricular stimulation | 5 | 367 | −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00) | 0.15 | 0% |
| <6 weeks' treatment | 1 | 47 | −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00) | 0.15 | 0% | |
| ≧6 weeks' treatment | 4 | 320 | −0.01 (−0.08, 0.07) | 0.81 | 0% | |
BF: body fat; BMI: body mass index; BW: body weight; CI: confidence interval; HC: hip circumference; MD: mean difference; WC: waist circumference; WHR: waist-to-hip ratio.
Figure 2The forest plot of outcome measure “body weight change magnitude.” Comparison. Auricular stimulation versus placebo. Subgroup analysis by treatment duration: shorter or longer or equal to six weeks.
Figure 3The forest plot of outcome measure “body mass index change magnitude.” Comparison. Auricular stimulation versus placebo. Subgroup analysis by treatment duration: shorter or longer or equal to six weeks.
Figure 4The forest plot of outcome measure “body fat change magnitude.” Comparison. Auricular stimulation versus placebo.
Figure 5The forest plot of outcome measure “waist circumference change magnitude.” Comparison. Auricular stimulation versus placebo. Subgroup analysis by treatment duration: shorter or longer or equal to six weeks.
Figure 6The forest plot of outcome measure “hip circumference change magnitude.” Comparison. Auricular stimulation versus placebo. Subgroup analysis by treatment duration: shorter or longer or equal to six weeks.
Figure 7The forest plot of outcome measure “waist-to-hip ratio change magnitude.” Comparison. Auricular stimulation versus placebo. Subgroup analysis by treatment duration: shorter or longer or equal to six weeks.
Figure 8Regression of numbers of auricular stimulation treatment on body weight. Std diff, standard difference.