| Literature DB >> 21799686 |
Yu-Chen Lee1, Te-Mao Li, Chung-Yuh Tzeng, Ying-I Chen, Wai-Jane Ho, Jaung-Geng Lin, Shih-Liang Chang.
Abstract
Animal studies have shown that electroacupuncture (EA) at Zusanli (ST-36) and Zhongwan (CV-12) acupoints reduces plasma glucose concentrations in rats with type II diabetes. However, whether EA reduces plasma glucose levels in type I diabetes is still unknown. In this study, we explore the various non-insulin-dependent pathways involved in EA-induced lowering of plasma glucose. Streptozotocin (STZ) (60 mg kg(-1), i.v.) was administered via the femoral vein to induce insulin-dependent diabetes in non-adrenalectomized and in adrenalectomomized rats. EA (15 Hz) was applied for 30 min to bilateral ST-36 acupoints after administration of Atropine (0.1 mg kg(-1) i.p.), Eserine (0.01 mg kg(-1) i.p.), or Hemicholinium-3 (5 μg kg(-1) i.p.) in non-adrenalectomized rats. Rats administered acetylcholine (0.01 mg kg(-1) i.v.) did not undergo EA. Adrenalectomized rats underwent EA at bilateral ST-36 acupoints without further treatment. Blood samples were drawn from all rats before and after EA to measure changes in plasma glucose levels. Expression of insulin signaling proteins (IRS1, AKT2) in atropine-exposed rats before and after EA was measured by western blot. Atropine and hemicholinium-3 completely blocked the plasma glucose lowering effects of EA, whereas eserine led to a significant hypoglycemic response. In addition, plasma glucose levels after administration of acetylcholine were significantly lower than the fasting glucose levels. In STZ-adrenalectomized rats, EA did not induce a hypoglycemic response. EA stimulated the expression of IRS1 and AKT2 and atropine treatment blocked the EA-induced expression of those insulin signaling proteins. Taken together, EA at the ST-36 acupoint reduces plasma glucose concentrations by stimulating the cholinergic nerves.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21799686 PMCID: PMC3136799 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/neq068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Hypoglycemic effects of ST-36 EA in STZ rats: EA represents fasting for 12 h and EA treatment for 30 min; non-EA represents the non-EA control group; comparison of plasma glucose levels was performed by self-pair t-test, **P < .01.
Influence of atropine, eserine and HC-3 on plasma glucose levels in STZ rats that underwent EA treatment at ST-36.
| Group ( | Before | After | HGA% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atropine + EA | 413 ± 29 | 408 ± 32 | –1 ± 4 |
| Atropine | 480 ± 51 | 480 ± 54 | 0 ± 2 |
| Eserine + EA | 406 ± 55 | 331 ± 57** | –19 ± 6# |
| Eserine | 460 ± 111 | 417 ± 105 | –9 ± 6 |
| HC-3 + EA | 510 ± 109 | 494 ± 106 | –3 ± 7 |
| HC-3 | 491 ± 61 | 471 ± 50 | –4 ± 4 |
The levels of plasma glucose are expressed as mean ± SEM (mg dl−1), n: sample number; atropine: atropine 0.1 mg kg−1 i.p. treatment; atropine + EA: atropine 0.1 mg kg−1 i.p. treatment prior to EA; eserine + EA: eserine 0.01 mg kg−1 i.p. treatment prior to EA; HC-3: HC-3, 5 μg kg−1 i.p. treatment; Before: plasma glucose levels 30 min following medicinal treatment; After: plasma glucose levels following 30 min of EA treatment to ST-36; HGA%: hypoglycemic activity; comparison of before and after EA treatment by self-pair t-test **P < .01 versus before; Student's t-test P < .05 versus the control group.
Hypoglycemic response to EA in STZ-adrenalectomized rats.
| Group ( | Before | After | HGA% |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADX-EA | 507 ± 39 | 494 ± 63 | –3 ± 6 |
| ADX-non EA | 460 ± 75 | 446 ± 78 | –3 ± 3 |
The level of plasma glucose are expressed as mean ± SEM (mg dL−1), n: sample number; ADX-non-EA: adrenal glands were removed + STZ induced but did not undergo EA; ADX-EA: adrenal glands were removed + STZ induced, followed by EA; before: before EA; after: after EA treatment at ST-36; comparison of plasma glucose levels before and after EA by self-pair t-test statistical analysis.
Figure 2Effect of EA and atropine on the expression of muscular insulin signaling proteins. All signaling protein values were calculated as a ratio of signal protein to actin. The ratios were compared within the groups. Signal: signal protein/actin ratio, STZ group: the STZ-induced diabetic rats were treated with normal saline as a control, STZ + Atro group: the STZ-induced diabetic rats were treated with atropine 0.1 mg kg−1 for 30 min before EA and non-EA. The Student's t-test was used to compare the means between the EA and non-EA groups, **P < .01 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Hypoglycemic effect of EA in different types of DM. The gray block and arrow indicate the main pathway of the present study; the open arrows summarize the pathway suggested from previous study in non-insulin-dependent DM (type 2) [5]; the solid thin arrow indicates the direction of stimulation. Type 1: insulin-dependent DM; type 2: non-insulin-dependent DM; AG: adrenal gland; EOPs: endogenous opioid peptides; (+) (–): bilateral zusanli acupoints (ST-36) connected to the positive and negative pole of the EA apparatus.