| Literature DB >> 25505744 |
Mahsa Darbandi1, Sara Darbandi1, Ali Akbar Owji1, Pooneh Mokarram2, Majid Ghayor Mobarhan3, Majid Fardaei4, Baxiao Zhao5, Hamid Abdi6, Mohsen Nematy7, Mohammad Safarian3, Mohammad Reza Parizadeh8, Mohammad Hossein Dabbaghmanesh9, Parisa Abbasi8, Gordon Ferns6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of abdominal obesity is on the rise worldwide. Previous studies have indicated the higher diagnostic value of body fat distribution pattern compared with general body in abdominal obesity assessments. Several non-pharmacological methods have been suggested for obesity management, of which acupuncture has gained a great deal of research interest with promising results. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of conventional auricular and body electroacupuncture on abdominal fat mass in obese men.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal fat mass; Acupuncture; Hip circumference; Obesity; Waist circumference
Year: 2014 PMID: 25505744 PMCID: PMC4261582 DOI: 10.1186/s40200-014-0092-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Metab Disord ISSN: 2251-6581
The demographic data of treatment and sham groups
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 38.0 ± 0.9 | 38.0 ± 1.3 | 39.0 ± 1.8 | 37.9 ± 1.5 |
|
| 171.0 ± 2.5 | 168.8 ± 1.6 | 173.9 ± 1.8 | 175.6 ± 0.7 |
|
| 99.6 ± 3.9 | 93.1 ± 4.2 | 102.0 ± 2.7 | 100.0 ± 2.7 |
|
| 33.4 ± 1.3 | 33.0 ± 1.5 | 33.4 ± 2.6 | 32.0 ± 3.9 |
|
| 17.0 ± 1.5 | 16.6 ± 1.5 | 16.5 ± 2.2 | 15.6 ± 1.7 |
|
| 108.2 ± 2.7 | 106.3 ± 2.1 | 108.3 ± 3.8 | 107.4 ± 2.4 |
|
| 116.6 ± 2.9 | 114.6 ± 2.4 | 113.2 ± 3.2 | 112.2 ± 3.8 |
BMI: body mass index. TFM: trunk fat mass. WC: waist circumference. HC: hip circumference. Values are means ± SD except where indicated. Independent t-tests were used to compare treatment and Sham groups. The demographic parameters did not differ significantly between the treatment and control groups before treatment (p > 0.05).
Figure 1Flowchart related to the study design of this work.
Changes observed in the four groups over the study period
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2ab | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.2ab |
|
| 1.4 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.3ab | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.2ab |
|
| 5.5 ± 1.1b | 4.3 ± 1.7a | 4.4 ± 1.0a | 0.9 ± 1.7abc |
|
| 4.5 ± 1.2b | 2.5 ± 0.8ab | 5.3 ± 0.8a | 0.2 ± 1.1abc |
1 -2 : the treatment period. 1st measurement: measurement of the below parameters at the beginning of the study. 2st measurement: measurement of the below parameters one day after treatment. BMI: body mass index; TFM: Trunk fat mass: WC: waist circumference; HC: hip circumference. Values are means ± SD. amean significant changes in comparison with first treatment and bmeans significant changes in comparison with second treatment group. cmeans significant changes in comparison with first sham group. In all statistical analyses a P value ≤ 0.05 was set as significant.