Literature DB >> 29358843

Statistical Power in Two-Level Hierarchical Linear Models with Arbitrary Number of Factor Levels.

Yongyun Shin1, Jennifer Elston Lafata2, Yu Cao3.   

Abstract

As the US health care system undergoes unprecedented changes, the need for adequately powered studies to understand the multiple levels of main and interaction factors that influence patient and other care outcomes in hierarchical settings has taken center stage. We consider two-level models where n lower-level units are nested within each of J higher-level clusters (e.g. patients within practices and practices within networks) and where two factors may have arbitrary a and b factor levels, respectively. Both factors may represent a × b treatment combinations, or one of them may be a pretreatment covariate. Consideration of both factors at the same higher or lower hierarchical level, or one factor per hierarchical level yields a cluster (C), multisite (M) or split-plot randomized design (S). We express statistical power to detect main, interaction, or any treatment effects as a function of sample sizes (n, J), a and b factor levels, intraclass correlation ρ and effect sizes δ given each design d ∈ {C, M, S}. The power function given a, b, ρ, δ and d determines adequate sample sizes to achieve a minimum power requirement. Next, we compare the impact of the designs on power to facilitate selection of optimal design and sample sizes in a way that minimizes the total cost given budget and logistic constraints. Our approach enables accurate and conservative power computation with a priori knowledge of only three effect size differences regardless of how large a × b is, simplifying previously available computation methods for health services and other researches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomized trial; interaction effects; multisite randomized trial; omnibus test; sample sizes; split-plot randomized trial

Year:  2017        PMID: 29358843      PMCID: PMC5774677          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2017.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  21 in total

1.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.

Authors:  E B Ferlie; S M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Primary care practice development: a relationship-centered approach.

Authors:  William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Carlos Roberto Jaén
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training.

Authors:  Lisa C Campbell; Francis J Keefe; Cindy Scipio; Daphne C McKee; Christopher L Edwards; Steven H Herman; Lawrence E Johnson; O Michael Colvin; Colleen M McBride; Craig Donatucci
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Incorporating cost in power analysis for three-level cluster-randomized designs.

Authors:  Spyros Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2009-06-09

5.  Generalized sample size determination formulas for experimental research with hierarchical data.

Authors:  Satoshi Usami
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

6.  Confidence Bounds and Power for the Reliability of Observational Measures on the Quality of a Social Setting.

Authors:  Yongyun Shin; Stephen W Raudenbush
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials.

Authors:  A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; K Robin Yabroff; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Intraclass correlation coefficients typical of cluster-randomized studies: estimates from the Robert Wood Johnson Prescription for Health projects.

Authors:  David M Thompson; Douglas H Fernald; James W Mold
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sample size calculation in hierarchical 2 × 2 factorial trials with unequal cluster sizes.

Authors:  Zizhong Tian; Denise Esserman; Guangyu Tong; Ondrej Blaha; James Dziura; Peter Peduzzi; Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.