Literature DB >> 8621994

Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials.

A Donner1, N Klar.   

Abstract

Community intervention trials are often characterized by the allocation of intact social units to different intervention groups. The assessment of adequate sample size for such trials must take into account the statistical dependencies among responses observed within an allocated unit. However, the small numbers of units typically involved in such trials imply that many methods of analysis that have been proposed for analyzing correlated data, particularly in the case of a dichotomous outcome variable, are not applicable to such designs. In this article we investigate this issue and determine the minimum number of units required per group, for the case of both a dichotomous and a continuous outcome variable, needed to provide adequate statistical power for detecting various levels of treatment effect. The use of significance testing as a method of detecting intracluster correlation is also investigated, and, in general, discouraged.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8621994     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00511-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  85 in total

1.  Analysis did not account for cluster randomisation.

Authors:  G Maclennan; C Ramsay; J M Grimshaw; M K Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-09

Review 2.  Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Liam Smeeth; Richard Ashcroft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials.

Authors:  Allan Donner; Neil Klar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of a physician-pharmacist collaborative model to improve blood pressure control.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; William Clarke; Gail Ardery; Cynthia A Weber; Paul A James; Mark Vander Weg; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Thomas Vaughn; Brent M Egan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-07

5.  Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; Kate Simpson; Kenneth Pietz; Tracy H Urech; Sylvia J Hysong; Jochen Profit; Douglas A Conrad; R Adams Dudley; LeChauncy D Woodard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The multilevel structure of four adolescent problems.

Authors:  Keith Smolkowski; Anthony Biglan; Clyde Dent; John Seeley
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2006-09

Review 7.  Partnership as an ethical model for medical research in developing countries: the example of the "implementation trial".

Authors:  D W Dowdy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Cluster randomized trials with treatment noncompliance.

Authors:  Booil Jo; Tihomir Asparouhov; Bengt O Muthén; Nicholas S Ialongo; C Hendricks Brown
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2008-03

9.  Surgical stress-induced immune cell redistribution profiles predict short-term and long-term postsurgical recovery. A prospective study.

Authors:  Patricia H Rosenberger; Jeannette R Ickovics; Elissa Epel; Eric Nadler; Peter Jokl; John P Fulkerson; Jean M Tillie; Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Training models for implementing evidence-based psychological treatment for college mental health: A cluster randomized trial study protocol.

Authors:  Denise E Wilfley; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Dawn M Eichen; Dorothy J Van Buren; R Robinson Welch; Athena H Robinson; Booil Jo; Ramesh Raghavan; Enola K Proctor; G Terence Wilson; W Stewart Agras
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.