Literature DB >> 29353961

Adaptive Management of Urban Ecosystem Restoration: Learning from Restoration Managers in Rhode Island, U.S.A.

Kristen Hychka1, Caroline Gottschalk Druschke2.   

Abstract

Urban aquatic restoration can be difficult to accomplish because of complications like pollutants, population density, infrastructure, and expense; however, restoration in urban settings has the potential to provide benefits to many people. The success of urban restoration projects-even those focused primarily on ecological targets-depends on community involvement and managers' understanding and consideration of community needs. However research on the social barriers to urban restoration and strategies managers use to overcome them is relatively rare. This work attempts to fill that gap. Building from interviews with restoration managers involved in urban aquatic restoration projects in Rhode Island, we contribute through an adaptive management approach: identifying and synthesizing the barriers for aquatic restoration projects in urban settings and strategies to overcome them. Ultimately, we suggest potential for double- and triple-loop learning by disentangling and critiquing the frames and policy/power structures that influence decision making in urban aquatic restoration.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29353961      PMCID: PMC5771507          DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2017.1315653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Nat Resour        ISSN: 0894-1920


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the efficacy of adaptive management approaches: is there a formula for success?

Authors:  Jamie E McFadden; Tim L Hiller; Andrew J Tyre
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Ecology. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts.

Authors:  E S Bernhardt; M A Palmer; J D Allan; G Alexander; K Barnas; S Brooks; J Carr; S Clayton; C Dahm; J Follstad-Shah; D Galat; S Gloss; P Goodwin; D Hart; B Hassett; R Jenkinson; S Katz; G M Kondolf; P S Lake; R Lave; J L Meyer; T K O'donnell; L Pagano; B Powell; E Sudduth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

4.  River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation.

Authors:  Emily S Bernhardt; Margaret A Palmer
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains.

Authors:  Arjen E Buijs
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 6.789

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Combining ecosystem services assessment with structured decision making to support ecological restoration planning.

Authors:  David M Martin; Marisa Mazzotta; Justin Bousquin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.644

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.