Literature DB >> 21939034

River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation.

Emily S Bernhardt1, Margaret A Palmer.   

Abstract

River restoration is an increasingly common approach utilized to reverse past degradation of freshwater ecosystems and to mitigate the anticipated damage to freshwaters from future development and resource-extraction activities. While the practice of river restoration has grown exponentially over the last several decades, there has been little empirical evaluation of whether restoration projects individually or cumulatively achieve the legally mandated goals of improving the structure and function of streams and rivers. New efforts to evaluate river restoration projects that use channel reconfiguration as a methodology for improving stream ecosystem structure and function are finding little evidence for measurable ecological improvement. While designed channels may have less-incised banks and greater sinuousity than the degraded streams they replace, these reach-scale efforts do not appear to be effectively mitigating the physical, hydrological, or chemical alterations that are responsible for the loss of sensitive taxa and the declines in water quality that typically motivate restoration efforts. Here we briefly summarize this new literature, including the collection of papers within this Invited Feature, and provide our perspective on the limitations of current restoration.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939034     DOI: 10.1890/10-1574.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  25 in total

1.  Application of science-based restoration planning to a desert river system.

Authors:  Brian G Laub; Justin Jimenez; Phaedra Budy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; Michael G McManus
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 2.443

3.  The Social, Historical, and Institutional Contingencies of Dam Removal.

Authors:  F J Magilligan; C S Sneddon; C A Fox
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Manipulation of local environment produces different diversity outcomes depending on location within a river network.

Authors:  Brett M Tornwall; Christopher M Swan; Bryan L Brown
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of Dam Removal on Fish Community Interactions and Stability in the Eightmile River System, Connecticut, USA.

Authors:  Helen M Poulos; Barry Chernoff
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The potential and limitations of linking biological monitoring data and restoration needs of urbanized waterways: a case study.

Authors:  Stanley Kemp
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Lessons Learned from an Industry, Government and University Collaboration to Restore Stream Habitats and Mitigate Effects.

Authors:  Nicholas E Jones; Garry J Scrimgeour; William M Tonn
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish.

Authors:  Cecília G Leal; Jos Barlow; Toby A Gardner; Robert M Hughes; Rafael P Leitão; Ralph Mac Nally; Philip R Kaufmann; Silvio F B Ferraz; Jansen Zuanon; Felipe R de Paula; Joice Ferreira; James R Thomson; Gareth D Lennox; Eurizângela P Dary; Cristhiana P Röpke; Paulo S Pompeu
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.528

9.  Diverse Approaches to Implement and Monitor River Restoration: A Comparative Perspective in France and Germany.

Authors:  Bertrand Morandi; Jochem Kail; Anne Toedter; Christian Wolter; Hervé Piégay
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Influences of environmental factors on macroinvertebrate assemblages: differences between mountain and lowland ecoregions, Wei River, China.

Authors:  Shengli Li; Weifang Yang; Lizhu Wang; Kai Chen; Sheng Xu; Beixin Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.