Jacqueline R Ho1,2, Nabil Arrach3,4, Katherine Rhodes-Long1,2, Wael Salem1,2, Lynda K McGinnis1, Karine Chung1,2, Kristin A Bendikson1,2, Richard J Paulson1,2, Ali Ahmady5,6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. USC Fertility Center, 1127 Wilshire Blvd, #1400, Los Angeles, CA, 90017, USA. 3. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. 4. Progenesis Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Ali.ahmady@med.usc.edu. 6. USC Fertility Center, 1127 Wilshire Blvd, #1400, Los Angeles, CA, 90017, USA. Ali.ahmady@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and assessment of mitochondrial content (MC) are current methods for selection of the best embryos for transfer. Studies suggest that time-lapse morphokinetics (TLM) may also be helpful for selecting embryos more likely to implant. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between TLM parameters and MC to determine if they could be used adjunctively in embryo selection. We also examined the relationship between MC with ploidy and blastulation. METHODS: Cryopreserved human embryos at the zygote stage were thawed and cultured in a time-lapse system. Blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies were performed on days 3 and 6. Biopsied cells and all whole embryos from day 6 were analyzed for MC (ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear DNA) and ploidy using next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: In embryos, MC per cell declined between day 3 and day 6. While early cleavage parameters did not predict MC, embryos with longer blastulation timing had higher MC on day 6. Day 6 MC was lower in euploid vs. aneuploid embryos and lower in blastocysts vs. arrested embryos. CONCLUSIONS: A lower MC at the blastocyst stage was associated with euploid status and blastocyst formation, indicating better embryo quality compared to those with a higher MC. Higher MC in aneuploid and arrested embryos may be explained by slower cell division or degradation of genomic DNA over time. Blastulation timing may be helpful for selection of higher quality embryos. Combining blastulation timing and MC along with morphologic grading and euploid status may offer a new direction in embryo selection.
PURPOSE: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and assessment of mitochondrial content (MC) are current methods for selection of the best embryos for transfer. Studies suggest that time-lapse morphokinetics (TLM) may also be helpful for selecting embryos more likely to implant. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between TLM parameters and MC to determine if they could be used adjunctively in embryo selection. We also examined the relationship between MC with ploidy and blastulation. METHODS: Cryopreserved human embryos at the zygote stage were thawed and cultured in a time-lapse system. Blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies were performed on days 3 and 6. Biopsied cells and all whole embryos from day 6 were analyzed for MC (ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear DNA) and ploidy using next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: In embryos, MC per cell declined between day 3 and day 6. While early cleavage parameters did not predict MC, embryos with longer blastulation timing had higher MC on day 6. Day 6 MC was lower in euploid vs. aneuploid embryos and lower in blastocysts vs. arrested embryos. CONCLUSIONS: A lower MC at the blastocyst stage was associated with euploid status and blastocyst formation, indicating better embryo quality compared to those with a higher MC. Higher MC in aneuploid and arrested embryos may be explained by slower cell division or degradation of genomic DNA over time. Blastulation timing may be helpful for selection of higher quality embryos. Combining blastulation timing and MC along with morphologic grading and euploid status may offer a new direction in embryo selection.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aneuploidy; Embryology; Mitochondrial DNA; Time lapse
Authors: Catherine Racowsky; Michael Vernon; Jacob Mayer; G David Ball; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; David Wininger; William Gibbons; Joseph Conaghan; Judy E Stern Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Justin C St John; Joao Facucho-Oliveira; Yan Jiang; Richard Kelly; Rana Salah Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Herman Tournaye; Christos A Venetis; Human Fatemi; Basil Tarlatzis; Paul Devroey Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Neelke De Munck; Alberto Liñán; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Carmen Rubio; Nicolas Garrido; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Ana Arnanz; Neelke De Munck; Aşina Bayram; Ahmed El-Damen; Andrea Abdalla; Ibrahim ElKhatib; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: N De Munck; A Bayram; I Elkhatib; A Liñán; A Arnanz; L Melado; B Lawrenz; M H Fatemi Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 3.357