Literature DB >> 21132132

A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information.

P R Fitzsimmons1, B D Michael, J L Hulley, G O Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients increasingly use the internet to access health information. Inadequate health literacy is common and frequently limits patient comprehension of healthcare literature. We aimed to assess the readability of online consumer-orientated Parkinson's disease (PD) information using two validated measures.
METHOD: We identified the 100 highest ranked consumer-orientated PD webpages and determined webpage readability using the Flesch-Kincaid and Simple Measure Of Gobbledygook (SMOG) formulae.
RESULTS: None of the webpages analysed complied with current readability guidelines. Commercial websites were significantly easier to read (p = 0.035). The Flesch-Kincaid formula significantly underestimated reading difficulty (p < 0.0001). Ease of reading correlated weakly with search engine ranking (r = 0.35, p = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: Only 1% of the top 100 PD information webpages are fully comprehensible to the average adult. Simple Measure Of Gobbledygook should be the preferred measure of webpage readability. Parkinson's disease information websites require major text revision to comply with readability guidelines and to be comprehensible to the average patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21132132     DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2010.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb        ISSN: 1478-2715


  35 in total

1.  Differences in perceived difficulty in print and online patient education materials.

Authors:  Michael Farnsworth
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

2.  The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Francesco Brigo; Roberto Erro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Burhan Fatih Kocyigit; Tuba Tulay Koca; Mazlum Serdar Akaltun
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Albert C Yang; Ying Duan; Ming Dong; Albert S Yeung
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.

Authors:  Alexandra Martin; J Ryan Stewart; Jeremy Gaskins; Erin Medlin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Quality of information available via the internet for patients with head and neck cancer: are we improving?

Authors:  James Best; Jameel Muzaffar; Alistair Mitchell-Innes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Consent information leaflets - readable or unreadable?

Authors:  Caroline Graham; John M Reynard; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  J Clin Urol       Date:  2015-04-24

8.  A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the characteristics of gout patient education resources.

Authors:  Philip C Robinson; H Ralph Schumacher
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.

Authors:  Daniel José Correa; Lindsey Milano; Churl-Su Kwon; Nathalie Jetté; Dennis Dlugos; Lauren Harte-Hargrove; Mary Jo Pugh; Jessica K Smith; Solomon L Moshé
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Medicine Administration in People with Parkinson's Disease in New Zealand: An Interprofessional, Stakeholder-Driven Online Survey.

Authors:  Monica Amer Oad; Anna Miles; Avril Lee; Angela Lambie
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.