Literature DB >> 27252451

Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis.

Manish Motwani1, Damini Dey1, Daniel S Berman1, Guido Germano1, Stephan Achenbach2, Mouaz H Al-Mallah3, Daniele Andreini4, Matthew J Budoff5, Filippo Cademartiri6,7, Tracy Q Callister8, Hyuk-Jae Chang9, Kavitha Chinnaiyan10, Benjamin J W Chow11, Ricardo C Cury12, Augustin Delago13, Millie Gomez14, Heidi Gransar1, Martin Hadamitzky15, Joerg Hausleiter16, Niree Hindoyan14, Gudrun Feuchtner17, Philipp A Kaufmann18, Yong-Jin Kim19, Jonathon Leipsic20, Fay Y Lin14, Erica Maffei21, Hugo Marques22, Gianluca Pontone23, Gilbert Raff10, Ronen Rubinshtein24, Leslee J Shaw25, Julia Stehli18, Todd C Villines26, Allison Dunning27, James K Min28, Piotr J Slomka1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Traditional prognostic risk assessment in patients undergoing non-invasive imaging is based upon a limited selection of clinical and imaging findings. Machine learning (ML) can consider a greater number and complexity of variables. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and accuracy of ML to predict 5-year all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), and compared the performance to existing clinical or CCTA metrics. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The analysis included 10 030 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and 5-year follow-up from the COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter registry. All patients underwent CCTA as their standard of care. Twenty-five clinical and 44 CCTA parameters were evaluated, including segment stenosis score (SSS), segment involvement score (SIS), modified Duke index (DI), number of segments with non-calcified, mixed or calcified plaques, age, sex, gender, standard cardiovascular risk factors, and Framingham risk score (FRS). Machine learning involved automated feature selection by information gain ranking, model building with a boosted ensemble algorithm, and 10-fold stratified cross-validation. Seven hundred and forty-five patients died during 5-year follow-up. Machine learning exhibited a higher area-under-curve compared with the FRS or CCTA severity scores alone (SSS, SIS, DI) for predicting all-cause mortality (ML: 0.79 vs. FRS: 0.61, SSS: 0.64, SIS: 0.64, DI: 0.62; P< 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning combining clinical and CCTA data was found to predict 5-year ACM significantly better than existing clinical or CCTA metrics alone. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary CT angiography; Coronary artery disease; Machine learning; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27252451      PMCID: PMC5897836          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  24 in total

1.  Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods.

Authors:  Annette M Molinaro; Richard Simon; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Boosting for high-dimensional time-to-event data with competing risks.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Arthur Allignol; Martin Schumacher; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry.

Authors:  Benjamin J W Chow; Gary Small; Yeung Yam; Li Chen; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Martin Hadamitzky; Jörg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Fay Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; James K Min
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  X Kang; D S Berman; H C Lewin; I Cohen; J D Friedman; G Germano; R Hachamovitch; L J Shaw
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities for cardiovascular disease prevention.

Authors:  Manuel Franco; Richard S Cooper; Usama Bilal; Valentín Fuster
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Prediction of revascularization after myocardial perfusion SPECT by machine learning in a large population.

Authors:  Reza Arsanjani; Damini Dey; Tigran Khachatryan; Aryeh Shalev; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Rine Nakanishi; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Niels van Pelt; Annick Weustink; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; Eric Boersma; Eveline Regar; Robert J van Geuns; Peter J de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Barbara Freissmuth; Tanja Meyer; Franziska Hein; Adnan Kastrati; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04

10.  Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry).

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel Berman; Matthew Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Millie Gomez; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; James K Min; Gil Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  168 in total

1.  Machine Learning and Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in COPD.

Authors:  Matthew Moll; Dandi Qiao; Elizabeth A Regan; Gary M Hunninghake; Barry J Make; Ruth Tal-Singer; Michael J McGeachie; Peter J Castaldi; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko; James M Wells; David LaFon; Matthew Strand; Russell P Bowler; MeiLan K Han; Jorgen Vestbo; Bartolome Celli; Peter Calverley; James Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Brian D Hobbs; Michael H Cho
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Machine learning in the integration of simple variables for identifying patients with myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco; Remco J J Knol; Carlos A Sanchez-Catasus; Octavio Martinez-Manzanera; Friso M van der Zant; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  An Interpretable Machine Learning Survival Model for Predicting Long-term Kidney Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy.

Authors:  Yingxue Li; Tingyu Chen; Tiange Chen; Xiang Li; Caihong Zeng; Zhihong Liu; Guotong Xie
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

4.  Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Kipp W Johnson; Robert S Rosenson; Zhen Wang; Mehmet Aydar; Usman Baber; James K Min; W H Wilson Tang; Jonathan L Halperin; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Piotr J Slomka; Paul Leeson; Dorin Comaniciu; Sirish Shrestha; Partho P Sengupta; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Postoperative bleeding risk prediction for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  David Chen; Naveed Afzal; Sunghwan Sohn; Elizabeth B Habermann; James M Naessens; David W Larson; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in personalized cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Ikram-Ul Haq; Iqraa Haq; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 8.  Machine learning for predicting cardiac events: what does the future hold?

Authors:  Brijesh Patel; Partho Sengupta
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-02-23

9.  Deep Learning for Prediction of Obstructive Disease From Fast Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Julian Betancur; Frederic Commandeur; Mahsaw Motlagh; Tali Sharir; Andrew J Einstein; Sabahat Bokhari; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Guido Germano; Yuka Otaki; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-14

10.  Predicting Survival From Large Echocardiography and Electronic Health Record Datasets: Optimization With Machine Learning.

Authors:  Manar D Samad; Alvaro Ulloa; Gregory J Wehner; Linyuan Jing; Dustin Hartzel; Christopher W Good; Brent A Williams; Christopher M Haggerty; Brandon K Fornwalt
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.