Literature DB >> 29351057

Global Gene Expression Response in Mouse Models of DNA Repair Deficiency after Gamma Irradiation.

Nils Rudqvist1, Evagelia C Laiakis2, Shanaz A Ghandhi1, Suresh Kumar1, Jeffrey D Knotts1, Mashkura Chowdhury1, Albert J Fornace2, Sally A Amundson1.   

Abstract

In the event of an improvised nuclear device or "dirty bomb" in a highly populated area, potentially hundreds of thousands of people will require screening to ensure that exposed individuals receive appropriate treatment. For this reason, there is a need to develop tools for high-throughput radiation biodosimetry. Gene expression represents an emerging approach to biodosimetry and could potentially provide an estimate of both absorbed dose and individual radiation-induced injury. Since approximately 2-4% of humans are thought to be radiosensitive, and would suffer greater radiological injury at a given dose than members of the general population, it is of interest to explore the potential impact of such sensitivity on the biodosimetric gene expression signatures being developed. In this study, we used wild-type mice and genetically engineered mouse models deficient in two DNA repair pathways that can contribute to radiation sensitivity to estimate the maximum effect of differences in radiosensitivity. We compared gene expression in response to a roughly equitoxic (LD50/30) dose of gamma rays in wild-type C57BL/6 (8 Gy) and DNA double-strand break repair-deficient Atm-/- (4 Gy) and Prkdcscid (3 Gy) mutants of C57BL/6. Overall, 780 genes were significantly differentially expressed in wild-type mice one day postirradiation, 232 in Atm-/- and 269 in Prkdcscid. Upstream regulators including TP53 and NFκB were predicted to be activated by radiation exposure in the wild-type mice, but not in either of the DNA repair-deficient mutant strains. There was also a significant muting of the apparent inflammatory response triggered by radiation in both mutant strains. These differences impacted the ability of gene expression signatures developed in wild-type mice to detect potentially fatal radiation exposure in the DNA repair-deficient mice, with the greatest impact on Atm-/- mice. However, the inclusion of mutant mice in gene selection vastly improved performance of the classifiers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29351057      PMCID: PMC5954417          DOI: 10.1667/RR14862.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  43 in total

Review 1.  The many substrates and functions of ATM.

Authors:  M B Kastan; D S Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Power and sample size for DNA microarray studies.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Ting Lee; G A Whitmore
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Priority list of research areas for radiological nuclear threat countermeasures.

Authors:  Terry C Pellmar; Sara Rockwell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Gene expression analysis in radiotherapy patients and C57BL/6 mice as a measure of exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Ashley N Filiano; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; John Fiveash; Jarrod Gage; Alan Cantor; Sandhya Kharbanda; Martin R Johnson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  The Nuclear Factor κB pathway: A link to the immune system in the radiation response.

Authors:  Christine E Hellweg
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Granulosa cell tumorigenesis in genetically hypogonadal-immunodeficient mice grafted with ovaries from tumor-susceptible donors.

Authors:  W G Beamer; K L Shultz; B J Tennent; L D Shultz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Molecular markers of radiation-related normal tissue toxicity.

Authors:  Paul Okunieff; Yuhchyau Chen; David J Maguire; Amy K Huser
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Gene expression signatures that predict radiation exposure in mice and humans.

Authors:  Holly K Dressman; Garrett G Muramoto; Nelson J Chao; Sarah Meadows; Dawn Marshall; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Joseph R Nevins; John P Chute
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Gene expression signature in mouse thyroid tissue after (131)I and (211)At exposure.

Authors:  Nils Rudqvist; Johan Spetz; Emil Schüler; Britta Langen; Toshima Z Parris; Khalil Helou; Eva Forssell-Aronsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  13 in total

1.  Global metabolomic responses in urine from atm deficient mice in response to LD50/30 gamma irradiation doses.

Authors:  Evagelia C Laiakis; Tytus D Mak; Steven J Strawn; Yi-Wen Wang; Bo-Hyun Moon; Pelagie Ake; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Effect of the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Cascade on Radiation Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Sanjay Mukherjee; Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Albert J Fornace; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Small Molecule Signatures of Mice Lacking T-cell p38 Alternate Activation, a Model for Immunosuppression Conditions, after Total-Body Irradiation.

Authors:  Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Jerry Angdisen; Meth M Jayatilake; Pelagie Ake; Lorreta Yun-Tien Lin; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Development of Biomarkers for Radiation Biodosimetry and Medical Countermeasures Research: Current Status, Utility, and Regulatory Pathways.

Authors:  Merriline M Satyamitra; Andrea L DiCarlo; Brynn A Hollingsworth; Thomas A Winters; Lanyn P Taliaferro
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  Gene Expression in Parp1 Deficient Mice Exposed to a Median Lethal Dose of Gamma Rays.

Authors:  M A Suresh Kumar; Evagelia C Laiakis; Shanaz A Ghandhi; Shad R Morton; Albert J Fornace; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Dose and Dose-Rate Effects in a Mouse Model of Internal Exposure from 137Cs. Part 2: Integration of Gamma-H2AX and Gene Expression Biomarkers for Retrospective Radiation Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Shanaz A Ghandhi; Helen C Turner; Waylon Weber; Dunstana Melo; Sally A Amundson; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Impact of aging on gene expression response to x-ray irradiation using mouse blood.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Axel J Duval; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The transcriptomic revolution and radiation biology.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Chronic stress increases transcriptomic indicators of biological aging in mouse bone marrow leukocytes.

Authors:  Kelly E Rentscher; Judith E Carroll; Lilian R Polsky; Donald M Lamkin
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun Health       Date:  2022-04-12

10.  Effects of Genetic Variation on Urinary Small Molecule Signatures of Mice after Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: A Study of p53 Deficiency.

Authors:  Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Pelagie Ake; Steven J Strawn; Yi-Wen Wang; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.