Literature DB >> 29350305

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Subrata Kar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices (PMCSD) consist of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts), Tandem Heart (Cardiac Assist, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), or extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). They augment cardiac output, cardiac index, and cardiac power which allow the operator to mitigate hemodynamic perturbations during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). This review discusses PMCSD and their contemporary literature. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent literature has substantiated the hemodynamic benefits of PMCSD in HR-PCI and cardiogenic shock, but no mortality benefit was found. As stent technology improves, PCI is expanding into high-risk cases in which PMCSD provide hemodynamic support allowing safe and complete revascularization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; Impella; Intra-aortic balloon pump; Mechanical circulatory support device; Stent

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29350305     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-018-0946-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  22 in total

1.  A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

Authors:  William W O'Neill; Neal S Kleiman; Jeffrey Moses; Jose P S Henriques; Simon Dixon; Joseph Massaro; Igor Palacios; Brijeshwar Maini; Suresh Mulukutla; Vladimír Dzavík; Jeffrey Popma; Pamela S Douglas; Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Left ventricular assist for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Haile A Jones; Deepika R Kalisetti; Mahender Gaba; Daniel J McCormick; Sheldon Goldberg
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.022

3.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Antoinette de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Bernward Lauer; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Karl Werdan; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function undergoing PCI with Impella 2.5 hemodynamic support have improved 90-day outcomes compared to intra-aortic balloon pump: a sub-study of the PROTECT II trial.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Annapoorna Kini; Subhash Banerjee; George Dangas; Joseph Massaro; Roxana Mehran; Jeffrey Popma; William W O'Neill; Samin K Sharma
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.

Authors:  Perwaiz M Meraj; Rajkumar Doshi; Theodore Schreiber; Brijeshwar Maini; William W O'Neill
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Sanne E Hoeks; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.

Authors:  Simon R Dixon; José P S Henriques; Laura Mauri; Krischan Sjauw; Andrew Civitello; Biswajit Kar; Pranav Loyalka; Frederic S Resnic; Paul Teirstein; Raj Makkar; Igor F Palacios; Michael Collins; Jeffrey Moses; Karim Benali; William W O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Upscaling cardiac assist devices in decompensated heart failure: Choice of device and its timing.

Authors:  Sundeep Mishra
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-01-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing Percutaneous to Open Access for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pediatric Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Sarah B Cairo; Mary Arbuthnot; Laura Boomer; Michael W Dingeldein; Alexander Feliz; Samir Gadepalli; Christopher R Newton; Pramod Puligandla; Robert Ricca; Peter Rycus; Adam M Vogel; Guan Yu; Ziqiang Chen; David H Rothstein
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Case series of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy under short-term mechanical circulatory support with TandemHeart in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Leonie Großekettler; Bastian Schmack; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian; Philip Raake
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-16

Review 3.  Advanced Pulmonary and Cardiac Support of COVID-19 Patients: Emerging Recommendations From ASAIO-A "Living Working Document".

Authors:  Keshava Rajagopal; Steven P Keller; Bindu Akkanti; Christian Bime; Pranav Loyalka; Faisal H Cheema; Joseph B Zwischenberger; Aly El Banayosy; Federico Pappalardo; Mark S Slaughter; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Wenhai Shi; Wuwan Wang; Kechun Wang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Advanced Pulmonary and Cardiac Support of COVID-19 Patients: Emerging Recommendations From ASAIO-a Living Working Document.

Authors:  Keshava Rajagopal; Steven P Keller; Bindu Akkanti; Christian Bime; Pranav Loyalka; Faisal H Cheema; Joseph B Zwischenberger; Aly El Banayosy; Federico Pappalardo; Mark S Slaughter; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 8.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.