| Literature DB >> 29348466 |
Min-Hee Kim1, Jeongmin Lee1, Jeonghoon Ha1, Kwanhoon Jo1, Dong-Jun Lim1, Jung-Min Lee2, Sang-Ah Chang1, Moo-Il Kang1, Bong Yun Cha1.
Abstract
The association of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and vitamin D with Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was evaluated using representative data from the Korean population. Data from 7004 subjects aged 50 or older with preserved renal function (excluding chronic kidney disease stage 3b to 5) who were included in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2008 and 2010 were analysed. Higher PTH levels (pg/ml) were observed in subjects with MetS than in those without MetS among both genders (60.1 (58.6-61.6) vs. 62.4 (60.7-64.2) in males p = 0.018, 60.7 (59.4-62.1) vs. 63.9 (62.4-65.6) in females, p < 0.001). For females, PTH levels were significantly higher in subjects with MetS than in those without MetS after adjustment for possible covariates. Lower 25(OH)D levels were significantly associated with MetS only in male subjects (p = 0.004). As the number of MetS components increased, a significant rise in PTH levels (p for trend 0.005 in males and 0.024 in females) and a decrease in 25(OH)D levels (p for trend < 0.001 in males and 0.053 in females) were observed. In conclusion, among subjects with preserved renal function, PTH levels were possibly associated with MetS in females, whereas vitamin D levels exhibited a possible link to MetS in males.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29348466 PMCID: PMC5773688 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17397-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics total population
| Male (n = 3190) | Female (n = 3814) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60.8 ± 0.2 | 61.7 ± 0.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Smoking (%) | 35.5(1.1) | 4.8(0.5) | < 0.0001 |
| Drinking (%) | 17.8(0.9) | 0.8(0.2) | < 0.0001 |
| Regular exercise (%) | 28.3(1.1) | 23.8(1) | 0.0004 |
| Low Education status (%) | 46.9(1.3) | 23.3(1.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Low income (%) | 23.7(1) | 31.3(1.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Calcium intake (mg) | 431.5 + 8.4 | 559.0 + 9.2 | < 0.0001 |
| DM (%) | 18.1(0.8) | 14.4(0.7) | 0.0008 |
| HTN (%) | 51.6(1.2) | 49.1(1) | 0.103 |
| Metabolic syndrome (%) | 43.1(1.1) | 52.3(1.1) | < 0.0001 |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 23.9 ± 0.1 | 24.3 ± 0.1 | < 0.0001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 85.4 ± 0.2 | 82.3 ± 0.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 127.2 ± 0.4 | 126.8 ± 0.4 | 0.5328 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 81 ± 0.3 | 78.2 ± 0.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol l−1) | 104.8 ± 0.5 | 101.1 ± 0.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol l−1) | 186.7 ± 0.8 | 201.4 ± 0.7 | < 0.0001 |
| Triglyceride (mmol l−1) | 133.9(130.3–137.6) | 118.5(115.9–121.2) | < 0.0001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol l−1) | 48.4 ± 0.3 | 52.5 ± 0.3 | < 0.0001 |
| LDL cholesterol(mmol l−1) | 112 ± 0.7 | 126.1 ± 0.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Glomerular filtration rate ( | 91.37 + 0.4 | 88.9 ± 0.4 | < 0.0001 |
| PTH (pg/mL) | 61.1(59.8–62.4) | 62.4(61.2–63.6) | 0.0457 |
| Serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 21.6 + 0.3 | 18.5 + 0.2 | < 0.0001 |
BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; PTH, parathyroid hormone; Normal range of PTH is 8–76 pg/mL. Data are expressed as the means ± standard error (SE), percentage (SE) or geometric means (95% confidence interval).
Low educational status: subject with elementary to middle school.
Low income: the lowest quartile.
Comparison of parathyroid hormone levels between groups according to presence or absence of metabolic syndrome or its components.
| MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | MODEL 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Metabolic syndrome | ||||||||
| Absent | 60.1(58.6–61.6) | 60.7(59.4–62.1) | 60.3(58.8–61.9) | 61.8(60.4–63.2) | 60.3(58.7–61.9) | 61.5(60.1–62.9) | 60.4(58.8–62) | 61.3(59.9–62.7) |
| Present | 62.4(60.7–64.2) | 63.9(62.4–65.6) | 62.7(60.9–64.5) | 63.6(62–65.2) | 62(60.2–63.8) | 63.5(61.8–65.2) | 61.6(59.9––63.4) | 63.2(61.6–64.7) |
| P value | 0.0188 | 0.0003 | 0.0188 | 0.05 | 0.1066 | 0.0394 | 0.2289 | 0.0493 |
| High waist circumference | ||||||||
| Absent | 60.9(59.6–62.2) | 59.9(58.4–61.4) | 61.1(59.8–62.4) | 60.7(59.1–62.2) | 61(59.6–62.4) | 60.4(58.8–62) | 60.8(59.5–62.2) | 60.2(58.7–61.8) |
| Present | 61.6(59.4–63.9) | 64.1(62.6–65.6) | 61.8(59.6–64.1) | 64.1(62.7–65.7) | 61.1(59–63.3) | 64(62.4–65.7) | 61.1(59–63.3) | 63.7(62.2–65.2) |
| P value | 0.5032 | < 0.0001 | 0.5042 | 0.0005 | 0.9189 | 0.0006 | 0.7687 | 0.0008 |
| High blood pressure | ||||||||
| Absent | 58.7(57–60.5) | 58.4(56.9–59.8) | 59(57.3–60.8) | 59.5(58.1–61.1) | 58.7(56.8–60.6) | 59(57.5–60.6) | 58.9(57–60.8) | 59(57.5–60.5) |
| Present | 62.5(61–64) | 65.3(63.8–66.8) | 62.6(61.2–64.1) | 64.9(63.4–66.4) | 62.4(60.9–63.9) | 64.9(63.3–66.5) | 62.1(60.6–63.5) | 64.4(63–65.9) |
| P value | 0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0002 | < 0.0001 | 0.0005 | < 0.0001 | 0.0026 | < 0.0001 |
| High blood gluose | ||||||||
| Absent | 60.9(59.2–62.7) | 61.9(60.6–63.3) | 61.2(59.5–62.9) | 62.6(61.3–64) | 60.9(59.3–62.7) | 62.6(61.2–64.1) | 61(59.4–62.7) | 62.4(61–63.8) |
| Present | 61.2(59.7–62.8) | 63.1(61.4–64.9) | 61.4(59.9–63.1) | 62.9(61.2–64.7) | 61.1(59.5–62.8) | 62.5(60.7–64.3) | 60.8(59.2–62.4) | 62.2(60.5–63.9) |
| P value | 0.7611 | 0.2066 | 0.8005 | 0.7557 | 0.8553 | 0.8693 | 0.8275 | 0.8544 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | ||||||||
| Absent | 60.6(59.2–62.1) | 62.8(61.5–64.2) | 60.8(59.4–62.2) | 63.5(62.2–64.9) | 60.9(59.5–62.5) | 63.3(61.9–64.7) | 61(59.6–62.5) | 63.1(61.8–64.5) |
| Present | 61.7(59.8–63.6) | 61.7(59.9–63.5) | 62(60.1–64) | 61.5(59.8–63.4) | 61.1(59.3–63.1) | 61.5(59.6–63.4) | 60.8(59–62.6) | 61(59.2–62.8) |
| P value | 0.3086 | 0.238 | 0.2334 | 0.0532 | 0.8485 | 0.0951 | 0.8349 | 0.0345 |
| Low HDL cholesterol | ||||||||
| Absent | 60.2(58.7–61.8) | 61.7(60.1–63.4) | 60.5(58.9–62.1) | 62.8(61.2–64.5) | 60(58.4–61.7) | 62.8(61.1–64.6) | 60.2(58.6–61.8) | 62.8(61.1–64.5) |
| Present | 62.2(60.5–63.9) | 62.7(61.4–64.1) | 62.5(60.8–64.2) | 62.7(61.4–64.1) | 62.3(60.6–64.1) | 62.4(61–63.9) | 61.9(60.2–63.6) | 62(60.7–63.4) |
| P value | 0.0406 | 0.2837 | 0.042 | 0.9316 | 0.0281 | 0.6669 | 0.092 | 0.448 |
MODEL 1 non–adjusted.
MODEL 2 age, sex.
MODEL 3 age, sex, smoke, exercise, education levels, income status, calcium intake.
MODEL 4 age, sex, smoke, exercise, education levels, income status, calcium intake, vitamin D.
Comparison of vitamin D levels between groups according to presence or absence of metabolic syndrome or its components.
| MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | MODEL 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Metabolic syndrome | ||||||||
| Absent | 22 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.3 | 22 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.3 |
| Present | 21.1 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.2 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 |
| P value | 0.0044 | 0.3512 | 0.0045 | 0.4098 | 0.0312 | 0.4767 | 0.0613 | 0.7903 |
| High waist circumference | ||||||||
| Absent | 21.6 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 21.6 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 21.7 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.3 | 21.7 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 |
| Present | 21.7 ± 0.4 | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 21.8 ± 0.4 | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 22 ± 0.4 | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 22 ± 0.4 | 18.6 ± 0.3 |
| P value | 0.5612 | 0.9223 | 0.5602 | 0.97 | 0.2814 | 0.5441 | 0.271 | 0.8591 |
| High blood pressure | ||||||||
| Absent | 22.2 ± 0.3 | 18.9 ± 0.3 | 22.3 ± 0.4 | 19 ± 0.3 | 22.4 ± 0.3 | 19 ± 0.3 | 22.2 ± 0.3 | 18.8 ± 0.3 |
| Present | 21.3 ± 0.3 | 18.3 ± 0.2 | 21.3 ± 0.3 | 18.2 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.3 ± 0.3 | 21.5 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.2 |
| P value | 0.0024 | 0.009 | 0.0012 | 0.0153 | 0.0039 | 0.0148 | 0.0291 | 0.267 |
| High blood gluose | ||||||||
| Absent | 21.8 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.2 | 21.9 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.6 ± 0.2 |
| Present | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 21.4 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 |
| P value | 0.1961 | 0.6449 | 0.1784 | 0.6955 | 0.0608 | 0.8803 | 0.06 | 0.8524 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | ||||||||
| Absent | 22 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.2 | 22 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.8 ± 0.2 |
| Present | 21.1 ± 0.3 | 18.2 ± 0.3 | 21.2 ± 0.3 | 18.2 ± 0.3 | 21.3 ± 0.3 | 18.2 ± 0.3 | 21.3 ± 0.3 | 18.2 ± 0.3 |
| P value | 0.005 | 0.0879 | 0.0077 | 0.0999 | 0.0164 | 0.0572 | 0.0174 | 0.014 |
| Low HDL cholesterol | ||||||||
| Absent | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.8 ± 0.2 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.8 ± 0.2 | 22.2 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.3 | 18.8 ± 0.3 |
| Present | 21 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.1 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.2 ± 0.3 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 21.3 ± 0.3 | 18.5 ± 0.3 |
| P value | 0.0016 | 0.1444 | 0.0015 | 0.1603 | 0.0062 | 0.339 | 0.0132 | 0.2629 |
MODEL 1 non–adjusted.
MODEL 2 age, sex.
MODEL 3 age, sex, smoke, exercise, education levels, income status, calcium intake.
MODEL 4 age, sex, smoke, exercise, education levels, income status, calcium intake, PTH.
Multiple logistic regression analysis (Presence of Metabolic syndrome – PTH or Vitamin D).
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | MODEL 4 | ||||||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||
|
| |||||||||
| 1–3rd quartiles | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | |
| 4th quartile | 1.24 (1.022–1.505) | 1.382 (1.15–1.661) | 1.241 (1.022–1.507) | 1.213(1.005,1.463) | 1.148(0.929,1.417) | 1.238(1.012,1.514) | 1.105(0.894,1.365) | 1.227(1.002,1.504) | |
| P value | 0.0295 | 0.0006 | 0.0295 | 0.044 | 0.201 | 0.0382 | 0.3549 | 0.0482 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Less than 20 ng/ml | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | |
| 20 ng/ml or more | 0.795(0.675,0.937) | 0.97(0.832,1.132) | 0.795(0.675,0.937) | 0.963(0.825,1.124) | 0.812(0.679,0.97) | 0.947(0.798,1.125) | 0.824(0.688,0.988) | 0.978(0.823,1.163) | |
| P value | 0.0062 | 0.6993 | 0.0063 | 0.632 | 0.0219 | 0.5378 | 0.0362 | 0.8038 | |
Statistics were carried out using Logistic regression. adjusted for age, sex, self-pay of cancer screening, weight variation, waist-height ratio, physical activity, drink, smoking.
MODEL 1 non-adjusted.
MODEL 2 age, sex.
MODEL 3 age, sex, smoke, exercise, education levels, income status, calcium intake.
MODEL 4 age, sex, smoke, exercise, education levels, income status, calcium intake, PTH (or vitamin D).
*The cut-off values for the 4th quartiles of PTH was 76.8 pg/ml in male and 77.6 pg/ml in female.
Figure 1PTH (A and B) and 25(OH)D levels (C and D) according to the number of metabolic syndrome components.