Literature DB >> 29345993

Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States.

Diana Greene Foster1, M Antonia Biggs1, Lauren Ralph1, Caitlin Gerdts1, Sarah Roberts1, M Maria Glymour1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the socioeconomic consequences of receipt versus denial of abortion.
METHODS: Women who presented for abortion just before or after the gestational age limit of 30 abortion facilities across the United States between 2008 and 2010 were recruited and followed for 5 years via semiannual telephone interviews. Using mixed effects models, we evaluated socioeconomic outcomes for 813 women by receipt or denial of abortion care.
RESULTS: In analyses that adjusted for the few baseline differences, women denied abortions who gave birth had higher odds of poverty 6 months after denial (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.77; P < .001) than did women who received abortions; women denied abortions were also more likely to be in poverty for 4 years after denial of abortion. Six months after denial of abortion, women were less likely to be employed full time (AOR = 0.37; P = .001) and were more likely to receive public assistance (AOR = 6.26; P < .001) than were women who obtained abortions, differences that remained significant for 4 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Women denied an abortion were more likely than were women who received an abortion to experience economic hardship and insecurity lasting years. Laws that restrict access to abortion may result in worsened economic outcomes for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29345993      PMCID: PMC5803812          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  17 in total

1.  Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Lori F Frohwirth; Lindsay A Dauphinee; Susheela Singh; Ann M Moore
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2005-09

2.  Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.

Authors:  Eleanor A Drey; Diana G Foster; Rebecca A Jackson; Susan J Lee; Lilia H Cardenas; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Jack Cahill; Patricia Hartge
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Predictors of delay in each step leading to an abortion.

Authors:  Diana G Foster; Rebecca A Jackson; Kate Cosby; Tracy A Weitz; Philip D Darney; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Patient education and emotional support practices in abortion care facilities in the United States.

Authors:  Heather Gould; Alissa Perrucci; Rana Barar; Danielle Sinkford; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-05-18

Review 6.  The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jessica D Gipson; Michael A Koenig; Michelle J Hindin
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2008-03

7.  Understanding why women seek abortions in the US.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; Heather Gould; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion.

Authors:  Sarah Cm Roberts; M Antonia Biggs; Karuna S Chibber; Heather Gould; Corinne H Rocca; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Decision Rightness and Emotional Responses to Abortion in the United States: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Katrina Kimport; Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; John Neuhaus; Diana G Foster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of abortion on having and achieving aspirational one-year plans.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; M Antonia Biggs; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  38 in total

1.  Stability of Retrospective Pregnancy Intention Reporting Among Women with Unwanted Pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Mark R Wilson; Minjeong Jeon; Diana G Foster
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-11

2.  Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Sarah Raifman; Jessica Gipson; Katrina Kimport; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Sarah E Baum; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Male Abortion Beneficiaries: Exploring the Long-Term Educational and Economic Associations of Abortion Among Men Who Report Teen Pregnancy.

Authors:  Bethany G Everett; Kyl Myers; Jessica N Sanders; David K Turok
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  After Roe v. Wade: US researchers warn of what's to come.

Authors:  Mariana Lenharo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Comparing Prospective and Retrospective Reports of Pregnancy Intention in a Longitudinal Cohort of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Lauren J Ralph; Diana Greene Foster; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-03-18

7.  Differences in abortion attitudes by policy context and between men and women in the World Values Survey.

Authors:  Dana Loll; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2018-09-26

8.  "My good friends on the other side of the aisle aren't bothered by those facts": U.S. State legislators' use of evidence in making policy on abortion.

Authors:  Katie Woodruff; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  The macroeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Yana van der Meulen Rodgers; Ernestina Coast; Samantha R Lattof; Cheri Poss; Brittany Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Permeability of abortion care in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of women's experiences, health professional perspectives, and the internet resource of Women on Web.

Authors:  Lianne Holten; Eva de Goeij; Gunilla Kleiverda
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2021-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.