Literature DB >> 30193363

Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.

Diana Greene Foster1, M Antonia Biggs1, Sarah Raifman1, Jessica Gipson2, Katrina Kimport1, Corinne H Rocca1.   

Abstract

Importance: Evidence indicates that there are potential health, development, and maternal bonding consequences for children born from unwanted pregnancies. Objective: To examine the association of women receiving or being denied a wanted abortion with their children's health and well-being. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 5-year longitudinal observational study with a quasi-experimental design conducted between January 18, 2008, and January 25, 2016, examined women who received abortions just under the gestational age limit of 30 abortion facilities across the United States and women who were denied abortion just beyond the gestational age limit in these facilities. Analyses compared the children of 146 women who were denied an abortion (index children) with children born to 182 women who received an abortion and had a subsequent child within 5 years (subsequent children). Interview-to-interview retention averaged 94.5% (6895 of 7293) across the 11 semi-annual interviews. Exposures: Being born after denial of abortion vs after a new pregnancy subsequent to an abortion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perinatal outcomes and child health, child development, maternal bonding, socioeconomics, and household structure.
Results: This study included 328 women who had children during the study period (mean [SD] age at study recruitment, 23.7 [4.9] years). There were no differences by study group in consent to participate in the study, completion of first interview, or continuation in the study. Among the 328 children in the study (146 index children and 182 subsequent children), there were 163 girls and 165 boys. Perinatal and child health outcomes were not different between subsequent and index children, and there was no clear pattern of delayed child development. However, mixed-effects models adjusting for clustered recruitment and multiple observations per child revealed that poor maternal bonding was more common for index children compared with subsequent children (9% vs 3%; adjusted odds ratio, 5.14; 95% CI, 1.48-17.85). Index children lived in households with lower incomes relative to the federal poverty level than did subsequent children (101% vs 132% of federal poverty level; adjusted regression coefficient, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.10), and were more likely to live in households without enough money to pay for basic living expenses (72% vs 55%; adjusted odds ratio, 5.16; 95% CI, 2.34-11.40). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that access to abortion enables women to choose to have children at a time when they have more financial and emotional resources to devote to their children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193363      PMCID: PMC6248140          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  43 in total

1.  The influence of attitudes about unintended pregnancy on use of prenatal and postpartum care.

Authors:  T M Hulsey; M Laken; V Miller; J Ager
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Paternal influences on the timing of prenatal care among Hispanics.

Authors:  Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Mina Mehta; Sam Posner; Alfred N Poindexter
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

3.  PEDS: developmental milestones--an accurate brief tool for surveillance and screening.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Frances Page Glascoe; Nicholas S Robertshaw
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.168

4.  Addressing Japan's fertility decline: influences of unintended pregnancy on child rearing.

Authors:  Aya Goto; Seiji Yasumura; Junko Yabe; Michael R Reich
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2006-05

5.  Prenatal depression predicts postpartum maternal attachment in low-income Latina mothers with infants.

Authors:  Deborah F Perry; Anna K Ettinger; Tamar Mendelson; Huynh-Nhu Le
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2011-03-12

6.  Postnatal depression, maternal bonding failure, and negative attitudes towards pregnancy: a longitudinal study of pregnant women in Japan.

Authors:  Masayo Kokubu; Tadaharu Okano; Takashi Sugiyama
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  The long-term impact of parents' childbearing decisions on children's self-esteem.

Authors:  W G Axinn; J S Barber; A Thornton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

8.  The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care.

Authors:  K Kost; D J Landry; J E Darroch
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

9.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2013.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Alexander Ewing; Michele G Mandel; Katharine B Simmons; Danielle B Suchdev; Denise J Jamieson; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2016-11-25

10.  The effect of pregnancy intention on child development.

Authors:  T J Joyce; R Kaestner; S Korenman
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2000-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  Understanding the extent of contraceptive non-use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, National Survey of Family Growth 2011-2017.

Authors:  Brittni N Frederiksen; Katherine Ahrens
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-07-11

2.  The macroeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Yana van der Meulen Rodgers; Ernestina Coast; Samantha R Lattof; Cheri Poss; Brittany Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Permeability of abortion care in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of women's experiences, health professional perspectives, and the internet resource of Women on Web.

Authors:  Lianne Holten; Eva de Goeij; Gunilla Kleiverda
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2021-12

4.  Long-acting reversible contraception: A route to reproductive justice or injustice.

Authors:  Marsha Kaitz; David Mankuta; Lihi Mankuta
Journal:  Infant Ment Health J       Date:  2019-07-22

5.  Family medicine provision of online medication abortion in three US states during COVID-19.

Authors:  Emily M Godfrey; Erin K Thayer; Anna E Fiastro; Abigail R A Aiken; Rebecca Gomperts
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments.

Authors:  Katie Woodruff; Erin Wingo; Nancy F Berglas; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-08

7.  Associations between lifetime stress exposure, race, and first-birth intendedness in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer Malat; Elaina Johns-Wolfe; Teresa Smith; Grant S Shields; Farrah Jacquez; George M Slavich
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2020-10-28

8.  Complex situations: Economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider - but do not have - abortions.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Nancy F Berglas; Katrina Kimport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States.

Authors:  Roman Pabayo; Amy Ehntholt; Daniel M Cook; Megan Reynolds; Peter Muennig; Sze Y Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Prenatal care utilization in pregnant women who consider but do not have abortions.

Authors:  Marika Toscano; Jillian Wood; Sara Spielman; Rita Ferri; Natalie Whaley; Neil S Seligman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.