| Literature DB >> 29343259 |
R Gimenes1, C Gimenes2, C M Rosa1, N P Xavier1, D H S Campos1, A A H Fernandes3, M D M Cezar1, G N Guirado1, L U Pagan1, I D Chaer1, D C Fernandes4, F R Laurindo4, A C Cicogna1, M P Okoshi1, K Okoshi5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important mechanism leading to diabetic cardiomyopathy. Apocynin, a drug isolated from the herb Picrorhiza kurroa, is considered an antioxidant agent by inhibiting NADPH oxidase activity and improving ROS scavenging. This study analyzed the influence of apocynin on cardiac remodeling in diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic cardiomyopathy; Echocardiogram; Heart failure; Myocardial function; NADPH oxidase; NADPH oxidase blocker; Oxidative stress; Papillary muscle; Rat; Ventricular function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29343259 PMCID: PMC5771187 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-017-0657-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Body weight and systolic arterial pressure
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW (g) | 460 (447–503) | 461 (442–493) | 467 (443–498) | 469 (443–490) |
| Final BW (g) | 543 ± 53 | 519 ± 52 | 316 ± 43* | 313 ± 44# |
| SAP (mmHg) | 118 ± 10 | 114 ± 12 | 129 ± 13* | 131 ± 15# |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and 25th and 75th percentiles
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin, BW body weight, SAP systolic arterial pressure
* p < 0.05 vs CTL; # p < 0.05 vs CTL + APO
Echocardiographic structural data
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVDD (mm) | 8.39 ± 0.62 | 8.24 ± 0.49 | 8.03 ± 0.51 | 7.82 ± 0.65# |
| LVSD (mm) | 3.92 ± 0.48 | 3.87 ± 0.62 | 4.11 ± 0.62 | 4.16 ± 0.58 |
| LVDD/BW (mm/kg) | 15.6 ± 2.15 | 16.0 ± 1.74 | 25.7 ± 2.87* | 25.3 ± 3.13# |
| PWT (mm) | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 1.37 ± 0.08* | 1.32 ± 0.08# |
| LA (mm) | 5.76 ± 0.95 | 5.92 ± 0.63 | 5.68 ± 0.77 | 5.35 ± 0.81# |
| LA/BW (mm/kg) | 10.8 ± 2.35 | 11.6 ± 1.91 | 18.1 ± 2.35* | 17.3 ± 3.03# |
| LVM/BW (g/kg) | 1.68 ± 0.27 | 1.71 ± 0.26 | 2.44 ± 0.32* | 2.25 ± 0.32# |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin, LVDD and LVSD left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic diameters, respectively, BW body weight, PWT LV posterior wall thickness, LA left atrial diameter, LVM LV mass
* p < 0.05 vs CTL; # p < 0.05 vs CTL + APO
Echocardiographic left ventricular functional data
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFS (%) | 53.3 ± 4.90 | 53.3 ± 5.45 | 49.0 ± 5.19* | 46.9 ± 5.59# |
| EF | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.04* | 0.85 ± 0.05# |
| PWSV (mm/s) | 38.1 ± 3.84 | 37.2 ± 3.51 | 27.9 ± 2.21* | 30.2 ± 5.35# |
| S′ (cm/s) | 3.50 (3.25–3.56) | 3.50 (3.50–3.75) | 3.00 (3.94–3.00)* | 3.00 (2.50–3.00)# |
| Mitral E/A | 1.46 ± 0.16 | 1.55 ± 0.28 | 1.29 ± 0.20 | 1.47 ± 0.30§ |
| IVRT (ms) | 28.9 ± 2.63 | 30.1 ± 3.12 | 38.6 ± 6.05* | 38.6 ± 4.56# |
| E/E′ | 18.3 ± 3.51 | 18.8 ± 3.40 | 18.4 ± 3.01 | 19.7 ± 3.86 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and 25th and 75th percentiles
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin, EFS endocardial fractional shortening, EF ejection fraction, PWSV posterior wall shortening velocity, S′ tissue Doppler imaging of systolic velocity of the mitral annulus (average of septal and lateral wall), E/A ratio between early (E)-to-late (A) diastolic mitral inflow, IVRT isovolumic relaxation time, E′ tissue Doppler imaging of early diastolic velocity of mitral annulus (average of septal and lateral wall)
* p < 0.05 vs CTL; # p < 0.05 vs CTL + APO; § p < 0.05 vs DM
Basal left ventricular papillary muscle data
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT (g/mm2) | 7.53 ± 1.48 | 7.67 ± 1.20 | 5.98 ± 2.86 | 7.23 ± 1.82 |
| + dT/dt (g/mm2/s) | 79.9 ± 15.4 | 78.5 ± 13.6 | 52.5 ± 25.5* | 63.5 ± 16.5# |
| TPT (ms) | 183 ± 13 | 194 ± 17 | 224 ± 16* | 230 ± 13# |
| − dT/dt (g/mm2/s) | 32.0 ± 6.17 | 31.3 ± 6.55 | 20.7 ± 8.11* | 23.8 ± 5.84# |
| RT (g/mm2) | 1.00 ± 0.31 | 0.86 ± 0.38 | 0.85 ± 0.47 | 0.79 ± 0.25 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin, DT peak of developed tension, + dT/dt maximum rate of tension development, TPT time to peak tension, − dT/dt maximum rate of tension decline, RT resting tension
* p < 0.05 vs CTL; # p < 0.05 vs CTL + APO
Peak of developed tension (DT, g/mm2) of left ventricular papillary muscle following positive inotropic stimulation
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP30 | 9.47 ± 2.36 | 9.44 ± 1.97 | 6.73 ± 3.23* | 8.27 ± 2.29 |
| [Ca2+]o 2.5 mM | 8.61 ± 2.14 | 8.95 ± 1.87 | 6.28 ± 2.94* | 7.60 ± 2.11 |
| Iso 10−6 M | 7.79 ± 2.32 | 7.86 ± 1.63 | 5.62 ± 2.61* | 6.54 ± 2.06 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin, PP30 30-s post-rest contraction, [Ca] 2.5 mM extracellular calcium concentration, Iso 10 M β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol addition to the nutrient solution
* p < 0.05 vs CTL
Glycemia and serum oxidative stress
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycemia (mg/dL) | 100 ± 22 | 100 ± 16 | 599 ± 5* | 589 ± 37# |
| Catalase (μmol/g) | 4.21 ± 1.10 | 3.88 ± 1.40 | 1.08 ± 0.58* | 4.43 ± 1.73§ |
| SOD (nmol/mg) | 6.43 ± 0.59 | 5.65 ± 0.56* | 5.35 ± 0.28* | 6.67 ± 0.80#§ |
| GSH-Px (nmol/mg) | 42.2 ± 7.70 | 25.0 ± 4.41* | 30.9 ± 3.43* | 29.5 ± 3.44 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin, SOD superoxide dismutase, GSH-Px glutathione peroxidase
* p < 0.05 vs CTL; # p < 0.05 vs CTL + APO; § p < 0.05 vs DM
Myocardial NADPH oxidase activity
| CTL | CTL + APO | DM | DM + APO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOH (nM) | 38.1 ± 12.9 | 38.6 ± 11.1 | 36.0 ± 4.26 | 29.8 ± 6.38 |
| Ethidium (nM) | 103 ± 76 | 111 ± 77 | 102 ± 46 | 109 ± 51 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. NADPH oxidase activity was evaluated in membrane-enriched cellular fraction by quantifying two dihydroethidium oxidation-derived fluorescent compounds, 2-hydroxyethidium (EOH) and ethidium
CTL control, CTL + APO control treated with apocynin, DM diabetes mellitus, DM + APO diabetes mellitus treated with apocynin
p = ns