| Literature DB >> 26185015 |
Julliano F C Guimaraes1, Bruno P Muzio2, Camila M Rosa3, Andre F Nascimento4, Mario M Sugizaki5, Ana A H Fernandes6, Antonio C Cicogna7, Carlos R Padovani8, Marina P Okoshi9, Katashi Okoshi10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a major role in diabetic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis. Anti-oxidant therapy has been investigated in preventing or treating several diabetic complications. However, anti-oxidant action on diabetic-induced cardiac remodeling is not completely clear. This study evaluated the effects of rutin, a flavonoid, on cardiac and myocardial function in diabetic rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26185015 PMCID: PMC4504040 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-015-0255-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Anatomical parameters
| Parameters | C (n = 14) | C-R (n = 14) | DM (n = 16) | DM-R (n = 16) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW Initial (g) | 365 ± 24 | 360 ± 24 | 409 ± 34 | 370 ± 27 |
| BW Final (g) | 444 ± 42 | 434 ± 58 | 287 ± 33* | 345 ± 62#§ |
| LV weight (g) | 0.85 ± 0.09 | 0.77 ± 0.13 | 0.58 ± 0.12* | 0.68 ± 0.10# |
| RV weight (g) | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.05* | 0.17 ± 0.05* | 0.17 ± 0.05# |
| Wet/dry Lung | 4.72 ± 0.76 | 4.72 ± 0.92 | 4.84 ± 0.21 | 4.98 ± 0.55 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and percentiles 25 and 75%. One-way ANOVA in a factorial design 2 × 2 and Tukey’s post hoc test.
C untreated rats, C-R rutin-treated rats, DM untreated diabetic rats, DM-R rutin-treated diabetic rats, BW body weight, LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle, Wet/dry wet-to-dry weight ratio.
* p < 0.05 vs C; #p < 0.05 vs C-R; §p < 0.05 vs DM.
Echocardiographic structural data
| Parameters | C (n = 14) | C-R (n = 14) | DM (n = 16) | DM-R (n = 16) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 292 ± 33 | 293 ± 32 | 271 ± 57 | 283 ± 30 |
| LVDD (mm) | 8.12 ± 0.42 | 8.21 ± 0.36 | 8.30 ± 0.46 | 8.35 ± 0.51 |
| LVSD (mm) | 3.75 ± 0.57 | 3.91 ± 0.34 | 4.26 ± 0.36* | 3.97 ± 0.50 |
| PWT (mm) | 1.53 ± 0.11 | 1.53 ± 0.10 | 1.46 ± 0.07 | 1.34 ± 0.06# |
| SWT (mm) | 1.65 ± 0.05 | 1.63 ± 0.08 | 1.48 ± 0.10* | 1.40 ± 0.07#§ |
| LA (mm) | 5.76 ± 0.64 | 6.03 ± 0.71 | 5.73 ± 0.56 | 5.36 ± 0.53# |
| LVDD/BW (mm/kg) | 18.4 ± 1.81 | 19.2 ± 2.11 | 29.2 ± 3.07* | 24.7 ± 3.26#§ |
| LA/BW (mm/kg) | 13.0 ± 1.59 | 14.1 ± 2.47 | 20.1 ± 2.09* | 16.0 ± 2.85§ |
| LVM (g) | 0.94 ± 0.10 | 0.95 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.12 | 0.81 ± 0.11# |
| LVM/BW (g/kg) | 2.13 ± 0.25 | 2.23 ± 0.30 | 3.12 ± 0.47* | 2.38 ± 0.23§ |
| RWT | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.02* | 0.32 ± 0.02#§ |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA in a factorial design 2 × 2 and Tukey’s post hoc test.
C untreated rats, C-R rutin-treated rats, DM untreated diabetic rats, DM-R rutin-treated diabetic rats, HR heart rate, LVDD and LVSD left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic diameter, respectively, PWT LV posterior wall thickness, SWT septal wall thickness, LA left atrial diameter, LVM LV mass, RWT relative wall thickness, BW body weight.
* p < 0.05 vs C; #p < 0.05 vs C-R; § < 0.05 vs DM.
Echocardiographic left ventricular functional data
| Parameters | C (n = 14) | C-R (n = 14) | DM (n = 16) | DM-R (n = 16) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FS (%) | 54.1 ± 5.2 | 52.5 ± 2.87 | 48.7 ± 3.4* | 52.6 ± 4.2§ |
| PWSV (mm/s) | 44.5 ± 4.6 | 44.3 ± 3.54 | 35.5 ± 5.4* | 42.7 ± 4.6§ |
| E (cm/s) | 74.1 ± 11.7 | 66.6 ± 10.2 | 75.1 ± 14.3 | 79.8 ± 12.2# |
| A (cm/s) | 52.9 ± 11.3 | 45.5 ± 8.82 | 48.1 ± 18.1 | 63.1 ± 21.8#§ |
| E/A | 1.43 ± 0.23 | 1.51 ± 0.31 | 1.77 ± 0.82 | 1.36 ± 0.34§ |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA in a factorial design 2 × 2 and Tukey’s post hoc test.
C untreated rats, C-R rutin-treated rats, DM untreated diabetic rats, DM-R rutin-treated diabetic rats, FS endocardial fractional shortening, PWSV posterior wall shortening velocity, E early diastolic mitral inflow velocity, A late diastolic mitral inflow velocity, E/A E/A ratio.
* p < 0.05 vs C; #p < 0.05 vs C-R; §p < 0.05 vs DM.
Isolated papillary muscle data at 2.50 mM extracellular Ca2+ concentration
| Parameters | C (n = 10) | C-R (n = 13) | DM (n = 13) | DM-R (n = 12) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT (g/mm2) | 5.83 ± 0.86 | 6.57 ± 2.02 | 7.00 ± 0.85 | 6.49 ± 0.66 |
| TPT (ms) | 148.23 ± 7.45 | 146.92 ± 8.07 | 195.12 ± 8.07* | 168.33 ± 14.39#§ |
| RT1/2 | 159.86 ± 29.59 | 169.76 ± 14.17 | 224.62 ± 5.27* | 213.43 ± 26.45# |
| +dT/dt (g/mm2/s) | 59.54 ± 9.53 | 72.65 ± 21.22 | 66.65 ± 7.71 | 69.07 ± 11.14 |
| −dT/dt (g/mm2/s) | 25.53 ± 4.75 | 26.93 ± 7.02 | 23.28 ± 4.25 | 21.98 ± 3.16 |
| CSA | 0.961 ± 0.194 | 0.962 ± 0.294 | 0.889 ± 0.140 | 0.951 ± 0.144 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA in a factorial design 2 × 2 and Tukey’s post hoc test.
C untreated rats, C-R rutin-treated rats, DM untreated diabetic rats, DM-R rutin-treated diabetic rats, DT peak of developed tension, TPT time to peak of tension, RT time from peak tension to 50% relaxation, +dT/dt maximum rate of tension development, −dT/dt maximum rate of tension decline, CSA papillary muscle cross-sectional area.
* p < 0.05 vs C; #p < 0.05 vs C-R; §p < 0.05 vs DM.
Figure 1Peak of developed tension (DT) under different extracellular calcium concentrations. C untreated rats, C-R rutin-treated rats, DM untreated diabetic rats, DM-R rutin-treated diabetic rats. Values are mean and standard error; Anova and Tukey; *p < 0.05 DM vs C.