| Literature DB >> 30456799 |
David R A Reyes1, Mariana J Gomes1, Camila M Rosa1, Luana U Pagan1, Silmeia G Zanati1, Ricardo L Damatto1, Eder A Rodrigues1, Robson F Carvalho2, Ana A H Fernandes2, Paula F Martinez3, Aline R R Lima1, Marcelo D M Cezar1, Luiz E F M Carvalho1, Katashi Okoshi1, Marina P Okoshi1.
Abstract
We evaluated the influence of aerobic exercise on cardiac remodelling during the transition from compensated left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy to clinical heart failure in aortic stenosis (AS) rats. Eighteen weeks after AS induction, rats were assigned into sedentary (AS) and exercised (AS-Ex) groups. Results were compared to Sham rats. Exercise was performed on treadmill for 8 weeks. Exercise improved functional capacity. Echocardiogram showed no differences between AS-Ex and AS groups. After exercise, fractional shortening and ejection fraction were lower in AS-Ex than Sham. Myocyte diameter and interstitial collagen fraction were higher in AS and AS-Ex than Sham; however, myocyte diameter was higher in AS-Ex than AS. Myocardial oxidative stress, evaluated by lipid hydroperoxide concentration, was higher in AS than Sham and was normalized by exercise. Gene expression of the NADPH oxidase subunits NOX2 and NOX4, which participate in ROS generation, did not differ between groups. Activity of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase was lower in AS and AS-Ex than Sham and glutathione peroxidase was lower in AS-Ex than Sham. Total and reduced myocardial glutathione, which is involved in cellular defence against oxidative stress, was lower in AS than Sham and total glutathione was higher in AS-Ex than AS. The MAPK JNK was higher in AS-Ex than Sham and AS groups. Phosphorylated P38 was lower in AS-Ex than AS. Despite improving functional capacity, aerobic exercise does not change LV function in AS rats. Exercise restores myocardial glutathione, reduces oxidative stress, impairs JNK signalling and further induces myocyte hypertrophy.Entities:
Keywords: MAPK; cardiac remodelling; echocardiogram; oxidative stress; physical training; rat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456799 PMCID: PMC6349163 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Anatomical data
| Sham (n = 23) | AS (n = 19) | AS‐Ex (n = 22) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 510 ± 50.7 | 482 ± 41.6 | 464 ± 57.5 |
| LVW (g) | 0.94 (0.88‐0.98) | 1.84 (1.56‐2.09) | 1.48 (1.13‐1.95) |
| LVW/BW (mg/g) | 1.86 (1.69‐2.05) | 3.80 (2.98‐4.33) | 3.19 (2.23‐5.05) |
| RVW (g) | 0.24 (0.21‐0.25) | 0.46 (0.40‐0.55) | 0.43(0.36‐0.46) |
| RVW/BW (mg/g) | 0.48 (0.45‐0.50) | 0.99 (0.83‐1.11) | 0.89 (0.66‐1.05) |
| Atria weight (g) | 0.10 (0.09‐0.11) | 0.36 (0.21‐0.41) | 0.34 (0.31‐0.41) |
| Atria/BW (mg/g) | 0.20 (0.19‐0.23) | 0.75 (0.66‐0.82) | 0.71 (0.46‐0.93) |
| Lung weight (g) | 1.80 (1.66‐1.99) | 2.89 (2.11‐3.29) | 3.96 (2.31‐4.37) |
| Lung/BW (mg/g) | 3.80 (3.12‐4.11) | 6.30 (4.29‐7.05) | 8.41 (4.71‐9.74) |
One‐way ANOVA and Tukey or Kruskal‐Wallis and Dunn test. Data are mean ± SD or median and percentile.
AS: aortic stenosis; AS‐Ex: exercised aortic stenosis; BW: body weight; LVW: left ventricle weight; RVW: right ventricle weight.
P < 0.05 vs Sham.
Figure 1Maximal exercise test. Running time (A) and running distance (B) before exercise protocol; running time (C) and running distance (D) after exercise protocol. AS: aortic stenosis; AS‐Ex: exercised aortic stenosis. Data are median and percentile; Kruskal‐Wallis and Dunn test. *P < 0.05 vs Sham; # P < 0.05 vs AS
Echocardiographic structural data after exercise protocol
| Sham (n = 23) | AS (n = 19) | AS‐Ex (n = 22) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 504 ± 58 | 478 ± 50 | 461 ± 50 |
| LVDD (mm) | 8.29 ± 0.54 | 9.16 ± 0.86 | 9.11 ± 0.84 |
| LVDD/BW (mm/kg) | 16.7 ± 2.04 | 19.3 ± 2.62 | 20.0 ± 3.14 |
| LVSD (mm) | 3.99 (3.58‐4.50) | 5.04 (4.06‐5.34) | 5.12 (4.67‐5.99) |
| DPWT (mm) | 1.42 (1.38‐1.46) | 2.05 (1.85‐2.11) | 2.02 (1.84‐2.17) |
| SPWT (mm) | 3.01 (2.75‐3.14) | 3.48 (2.87‐3.79) | 3.49 (2.96‐3.74) |
| DSWT (mm) | 1.43 (1.39‐1.46) | 2.11 (1.85‐2.16) | 2.02 (1.84‐2.17) |
| SSWT (mm) | 2.51 (2.38‐2.64) | 2.82 (2.65‐3.16) | 3.00 (2.68‐3.25) |
| RWT | 0.34 (0.33‐0.36) | 0.42 (0.40‐0.47) | 0.44 (0.38‐0.49) |
| AO (mm) | 4.02 (3.83‐4.16) | 3.94 (3.84‐4.16) | 3.97± 0.20 |
| LA (mm) | 5.29 (4.93‐5.64) | 8.54 (7.72‐8.71) | 8.25 (7.15‐8.98) |
| LA/AO | 1.34 (1.26‐1.38) | 2.17 (1.86‐2.29) | 2.12 (1.75‐2.25) |
| LA/BW (mm/kg) | 10.4 (9.53‐12.1) | 17.4 (14.8‐19.5) | 17.6 (15.7‐19.5) |
| LVM (g) | 0.82 (0.76‐0.89) | 1.41 (1.33‐1.96) | 1.61 (1.18‐1.87) |
| LVMI (g/kg) | 1.70 (1.46‐1.87) | 2.97 (2.70‐3.90) | 3.40 (2.66‐4.16) |
One‐way ANOVA and Tukey or Kruskal‐Wallis and Dunn test. Data are mean ± SD or median and percentile.
AS: aortic stenosis; AS‐Ex: exercised aortic stenosis; BW: body weight; LVDD and LVSD: left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic diameters respectively; DPWT and SPWT: LV diastolic and systolic posterior wall thickness respectively; DSWT and SSWT: LV diastolic and systolic septal wall thickness respectively; RWT: relative wall thickness; AO: aorta diameter; LA: left atrial diameter; LVM: LV mass; LVMI: LVM index.
P < 0.05 vs Sham.
Echocardiographic data of left ventricular function after exercise protocol
| Sham (n = 23) | AS (n = 19) | AS‐Ex (n = 22) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 291 ± 40 | 295 ± 41 | 319 ± 41 |
| EFS (%) | 51.0 (46.4‐55.3) | 45.6 (38.7‐55.3) | 43.8 (38.3‐48.2) |
| MFS (%) | 29.5 (27.2‐32.4) | 26.8 (21.1‐33.5) | 24.5 (21.6‐28.6) |
| PWSV (mm/s) | 40.6 ± 5.55 | 30.8 ± 6.96 | 29.2 ± 7.15 |
| Tei index | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.42 ± 0.11 |
| EF | 0.88 (0.85‐0.91) | 0.84 (0.77‐0.91) | 0.82 (0.77‐0.86) |
| TDI S′ (average, cm/s) | 3.76 ± 0.70 | 2.95 ± 0.67 | 2.92 ± 0.49 |
| Mitral E (cm/s) | 79.0 (72.3‐83.5) | 142 (85.0‐158) | 142 (98‐164) |
| Mitral A (cm/s) | 58.0 (51.5‐67.0) | 25.5 (22.0‐47.0) | 20.0 (16.0‐58.5) |
| E/A | 1.39 (1.23‐1.52) | 5.38 (1.74‐6.82) | 8.00 (1.49‐9.14) |
| IVRT (ms) | 26.0 (22.0‐26.0) | 18.0 (15.0‐22.0) | 16.0 (15.0‐22.0) |
| IVRTn | 53.0 ± 7.08 | 42.8 ± 11.0 | 39.6 ± 10.3 |
| EDT (ms) | 46.2 ± 6.87 | 31.1 ± 8.67 | 30.1 ± 8.33 |
| TDI E′ (average, cm/s) | 4.51 ± 0.77 | 4.00 ± 1.26 | 4.23 ± 0.99 |
| TDI A′ (average, cm/s) | 4.49 ± 1.34 | 3.91 ± 1.39 | 4.07 ± 1.05 |
| E/TDI E′ (average) | 17.6 (14.7‐19.8) | 33.5 (26.5‐41.0) | 34.3 (25.1‐40.4) |
One‐way ANOVA and Tukey or Kruskal‐Wallis and Dunn test. Data are mean ± SD or median and percentile.
AS: aortic stenosis; AS‐Ex: exercised aortic stenosis; HR: heart rate; EFS: endocardial fractional shortening; MFS: midwall fractional shortening; PWSV: posterior wall shortening velocity; Tei index: myocardial performance index; EF: ejection fraction; TDI S′: tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) of systolic velocity of the mitral annulus; E/A: ratio between early (E)‐to‐late (A) diastolic mitral inflow; IVRT: isovolumetric relaxation time; IVRTn: IVRT normalized to heart rate; EDT: E wave deceleration time; TDI E′ and A′: TDI of early (E′) and late (A′) diastolic velocity of mitral annulus.
P < 0.05 vs Sham.
Myocardial morphometric parameters
| Sham (n = 10) | AS (n = 12) | AS‐Ex (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myocyte diameter (μm) | 13.4 ± 1.17 | 15.3 ± 0.97 | 16.7 ± 1.75 |
| ICF (%) | 4.30 ± 1.20 | 9.86 ± 1.69 | 8.46 ± 1.61 |
One‐way ANOVA and Tukey test. Data are mean ± SD.
AS: aortic stenosis; AS‐Ex: exercised aortic stenosis; ICF: interstitial collagen fraction.
*P < 0.05 vs Sham; # P < 0.05 vs AS.
Figure 2Myocardial concentration of total (A) and reduced glutathione (B); malondialdehyde serum concentration (C); lipid hydroperoxide myocardial concentration (D); and myocardial antioxidant enzyme activity: superoxide dismutase (E), catalase (F) and glutathione peroxidase (G). AS: aortic stenosis; AS‐Ex: exercised aortic stenosis; n: number of animals. Data are mean ± SD or median and percentile; ANOVA and Tukey or Kruskal‐Wallis and Dunn test; *P < 0.05 vs Sham; # P < 0.05 vs AS
Myocardial gene expression of NADPH oxidase subunits and protein expression of MAPKs
| Sham (n = 8) | AS (n = 7) | AS‐Ex (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| p22 phox | 1.00 ± 0.51 | 1.26 ± 0.98 | 1.33 ± 0.71 |
| p47 phox | 1.00 ± 0.48 | 0.89 ± 0.61 | 0.74 ± 0.43 |
| NOX 2 | 0.74 (0.55‐1.63) | 1.64 (0.29‐4.07) | 1.12 (0.50‐2.51) |
| NOX 4 | 1.01 (0.85‐1.06) | 3.47 (0.19‐3.67) | 1.39 (1.22‐1.82) |
| p‐ERK/ERK | 1.00 ± 0.22 | 1.46 ± 0.34 | 1.33 ± 0.20 |
| p‐ERK/GAPDHH | 1.00 ± 0.16 | 1.30 ± 0.85 | 1.74 ± 0.77 |
| ERK/GAPDH | 1.00 ± 0.21 | 0.98 ± 0.41 | 1.23 ± 0.58 |
| p‐JNK/JNK | 1.01 (0.86‐1.07) | 0.78 (0.68‐1.27) | 1.03 (0.94‐1.72) |
| p‐JNK/GAPDH | 1.07 (0.95‐1.18) | 1.15 (0.92‐1.26) | 1.88 (1.46‐2.22) |
| JNK/GAPDH | 1.00 ± 0.23 | 1.11 ± 0.19 | 1.48 (1.29‐1.73) |
| p‐P38/P38 | 0.74 (0.50‐1.68) | 1.29 (1.23‐1.81) | 0.40 (0.26‐0.70) |
| p‐P38/GAPDH | 1.00 ± 0.54 | 2.01 ± 1.30 | 0.69 ± 0.41 |
| P38/GAPDH | 1.05 (0.81‐1.13) | 1.00 (0.70‐2.58) | 1.37 (0.92‐1.92) |
One‐way ANOVA and Tukey or Kruskal‐Wallis and Dunn. Data are mean ± SD or median and percentiles.
AS: aortic stenosis; AS?Ex: exercised aortic stenosis.
P < 0.05 vs Sham;
P < 0.05 vs AS.