Literature DB >> 29342264

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control, Acute Admissions, and Quality of Life: A Real-World Study.

Sara Charleer1,2, Chantal Mathieu1, Frank Nobels3, Christophe De Block4, Regis P Radermecker5, Michel P Hermans6, Youri Taes7, Chris Vercammen8, Guy T'Sjoen9, Laurent Crenier10, Steffen Fieuws11, Bart Keymeulen12, Pieter Gillard1.   

Abstract

Context: Randomized controlled trials evaluating real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) show improved glycemic control, but limited data are available on real-world use. Objective: To assess impact of RT-CGM in real-world settings on glycemic control, hospital admissions, work absenteeism, and quality of life (QOL). Design: Prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study. Participants: A total of 515 adults with T1D on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy starting in the Belgian RT-CGM reimbursement program. Intervention: Initiation of RT-CGM reimbursement. Main Outcome Measure: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) evolution from baseline to 12 months.
Results: Between September 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, 515 adults entered the reimbursement system. Over this period, 417 (81%) patients used RT-CGM for at least 12 months. Baseline HbA1c was 7.7 ± 0.9% (61 ± 9.8 mmol/mol) and decreased to 7.4 ± 0.8% (57 ± 8.7 mmol/mol) at 12 months (P < 0.0001). Subjects who started RT-CGM because of insufficient glycemic control showed stronger decrease in HbA1c at 4, 8, and 12 months compared with patients who started because of hypoglycemia or pregnancy. In the year preceding reimbursement, 16% of patients were hospitalized for severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis in contrast to 4% (P < 0.0005) the following year, with decrease in admission days from 54 to 18 per 100 patient years (P < 0.0005). In the same period, work absenteeism decreased and QOL improved significantly, with strong decline in fear of hypoglycemia.
Conclusion: Sensor-augmented pump therapy in patients with T1D followed in specialized centers improves HbA1c, fear of hypoglycemia, and QOL, whereas work absenteeism and admissions for acute diabetes complications decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29342264     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-02498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  25 in total

1.  Role of continuous glucose monitoring in the management of glycogen storage disorders.

Authors:  Mrudu Herbert; Surekha Pendyal; Mugdha Rairikar; Carine Halaby; Robert W Benjamin; Priya S Kishnani
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Perceived Usefulness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices at the Workplace: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jessica Scharf; Xuan Quynh Nguyen; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Michael Krichbaum; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-20

3.  Flash glucose monitoring and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes with subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Sara Lomelino Pinheiro; Margarida Bastos; Luísa Barros; Miguel Melo; Isabel Paiva
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  Modern diabetes devices in the school setting: Perspectives from school nurses.

Authors:  Christine A March; Michelle Nanni; Traci M Kazmerski; Linda M Siminerio; Elizabeth Miller; Ingrid M Libman
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 5.  Advances, Challenges, and Cost Associated with Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Karishma A Datye; Daniel R Tilden; Angelee M Parmar; Eveline R Goethals; Sarah S Jaser
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Outcomes and Healthcare Provider Perceptions of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (rtCGM) in Patients With Diabetes and COVID-19 Admitted to the ICU.

Authors:  Kenneth W Chow; Danielle J Kelly; Mary C Rieff; Patricia A Skala; Igor Kravets; Marina M Charitou; Eric J Morley; Rajarsi Gupta; Joshua D Miller
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 7.  Minimising hypoglycaemia in the real world: the challenge of insulin.

Authors:  Chantal Mathieu
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Universal Subsidized Continuous Glucose Monitoring Funding for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: Uptake and Outcomes Over 2 Years, a Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Stephanie R Johnson; Deborah J Holmes-Walker; Melissa Chee; Arul Earnest; Timothy W Jones; Maria Craig; Kym Anderson; Geoff Ambler; Helen Barrett; Jenny Batch; Philip Bergman; Fergus Cameron; Peter Colman; Louise Conwell; Chris Cooper; Jennifer Couper; Elizabeth Davis; Martin de Bock; Kim Donaghue; Jan Fairchild; Gerry Fegan; Spiros Fourlanos; Sarah Glastras; Leonie Gray; Shane Hamblin; Paul Hofman; Dianne Jane Holmes-Walker; Neville Howard; Michelle Jack; Steven James; Craig Jefferies; Stephanie Johnson; Jeff Kao; Bruce R King; Antony Lafferty; Michelle Martin; Robert McCrossin; Mark Pascoe; Ryan Paul; Dorota Pawlak; Alexia Peña; Sarah Price; Darrell Price; Christine Rodda; David Simmons; Richard Sinnott; Alan Sive; Carmel Smart; Monique Stone; Steve Stranks; Elaine Tham; Charles Verge; Glenn Ward; Ben Wheeler; Judy Williams; Helen Woodhead; Nick Woolfield; Anthony Zimmermann
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Efficacy in Routine Use.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.134

10.  Associations of Time in Range and Other Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Metrics With Well-Being and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Overview and Trends.

Authors:  Dominic Ehrmann; Lilli Priesterroth; Andreas Schmitt; Bernhard Kulzer; Norbert Hermanns
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.